Cargando…

Computational simulation of the predicted dosimetric impact of adjuvant yttrium-90 PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation following radioembolization

BACKGROUND: (90)Y PET/CT post-radioembolization imaging has demonstrated that the distribution of (90)Y in a tumor can be non-uniform. Using computational modeling, we predicted the dosimetric impact of post-treatment (90)Y PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation of the portions of a tumor receiving the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasciak, Alexander S., Lin, Abigail, Georgiades, Christos, Findeiss, Laura K., Kauffman, Shannon, Bradley, Yong C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27957721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0244-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: (90)Y PET/CT post-radioembolization imaging has demonstrated that the distribution of (90)Y in a tumor can be non-uniform. Using computational modeling, we predicted the dosimetric impact of post-treatment (90)Y PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation of the portions of a tumor receiving the lowest absorbed dose. A cohort of fourteen patients with non-resectable liver cancer previously treated using (90)Y radioembolization were included in this retrospective study. Each patient exhibited potentially under-treated areas of tumor following treatment based on quantitative (90)Y PET/CT. (90)Y PET/CT was used to guide electrode placement for simulated adjuvant radiofrequency ablation in areas of tumor receiving the lowest dose. The finite element method was used to solve Penne’s bioheat transport equation, coupled with the Arrhenius thermal cell-death model to determine 3D thermal ablation zones. Tumor and unablated tumor absorbed-dose metrics (average dose, D50, D70, D90, V100) following ablation were compared, where D70 is the minimum dose to 70% of tumor and V100 is the fractional tumor volume receiving more than 100 Gy. RESULTS: Compared to radioembolization alone, (90)Y radioembolization with adjuvant ablation was associated with predicted increases in all tumor dose metrics evaluated. The mean average absorbed dose increased by 11.2 ± 6.9 Gy. Increases in D50, D70, and D90 were 11.0 ± 6.9 Gy, 13.3 ± 10.9 Gy, and 11.8 ± 10.8 Gy, respectively. The mean increase in V100 was 7.2 ± 4.2%. All changes were statistically significant (P < 0.01). A negative correlation between pre-ablation tumor volume and D50, average dose, and V100 was identified (ρ < − 0.5, P < 0.05) suggesting that adjuvant radiofrequency ablation may be less beneficial to patients with large tumor burdens. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that adjuvant (90)Y PET/CT-guided radiofrequency ablation may improve tumor absorbed-dose metrics. These data may justify a prospective clinical trial to further evaluate this hybrid approach.