Cargando…

Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry – Victoria

BACKGROUND: A new prostate cancer (PCa) prognostic grading system [Gleason groups (GGs)] has been proposed based on the contemporary Gleason scores (GSs), which has five simplified prognostic categories. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the GGs of prostate biopsy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Evans, Sue M., Patabendi Bandarage, Varuni, Kronborg, Caroline, Earnest, Arul, Millar, Jeremy, Clouston, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2016
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.004

Ejemplares similares

Importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictive factor for concordance between the Gleason scores of prostate biopsies and RADICAL prostatectomy specimens
por: de Lima, Nelson Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Rührup, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
por: Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
por: Fiorentino, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Erratum: Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A second opinion pathology review improves the diagnostic concordance between prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Maehara, Takanori, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study
por: Leo, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Kim, Hwanik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study
por: Pereira, Renan A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria
por: Rechtman, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The transverse and vertical distribution of prostate cancer in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Mai, Zhipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation
por: Wang, Xiaochuan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
por: Alqahtani, Saeed, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
por: Geybels, Milan S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?
por: Eroglu, Muzaffer, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Factors effective on survival after radical prostatectomy: To what extent is pre-operative biopsy Gleason scoring is confident in predicting the prognosis?
por: Açıkgöz, Onur, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Association of Fatty Acid Levels and Gleason Grade among Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Zhao, Zhiguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Kamecki, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens
por: Tomioka, Masayuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Long-Term Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients with Pathologic Gleason 8–10 Disease
por: Lewinshtein, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
por: Zhang, Baoling, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network
por: Wang, Guipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
por: Yang, Rong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation
por: He, Biming, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

From Cognitive MR-Targeted Fusion Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictors of Gleason Grade Group Upgrading in a Chinese Cohort
por: Yan, Huaqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ib5074r61v0k9tlp5741g9ti2q