Cargando…

Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?

PURPOSE: Localised prostate cancer diagnosis and management is increasingly complex due to its heterogeneous progression and prognostic subgroups. Pitfalls in current screening and diagnosis have prompted the search for accurate and invasive molecular and genetic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGrath, Shannon, Christidis, Daniel, Perera, Marlon, Hong, Sung Kyu, Manning, Todd, Vela, Ian, Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.002
_version_ 1782474691034742784
author McGrath, Shannon
Christidis, Daniel
Perera, Marlon
Hong, Sung Kyu
Manning, Todd
Vela, Ian
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_facet McGrath, Shannon
Christidis, Daniel
Perera, Marlon
Hong, Sung Kyu
Manning, Todd
Vela, Ian
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_sort McGrath, Shannon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Localised prostate cancer diagnosis and management is increasingly complex due to its heterogeneous progression and prognostic subgroups. Pitfalls in current screening and diagnosis have prompted the search for accurate and invasive molecular and genetic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Such tools may be able to distinguish clinically significant cancers from less aggressive variants to assist with prostate cancer risk stratification and guide decisions and healthcare algorithms. We aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the current prostate cancer biomarkers available and in development. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases searches were conducted to identify articles pertaining to the use of novel biomarkers for prostate cancer. RESULTS: A growing number of novel biomarkers are currently under investigation. Such markers include urinary biomarkers, serology-based markers or pathological tissue assessments of molecular and genetic markers. While limited clinical data is present for analysis, early results appear promising. Specifically, a combination of serum and urinary biomarkers (Serum PSA + Urinary PCA3 + Urinary TMPRSS2-ERG fusion) appears to provide superior sensitivity and specificity profiles compared to traditional diagnostic approaches (AUC 0.88). CONCLUSION: The accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer is critical to ensure appropriate intervention. The development of non-invasive biomarkers can add to the information provided by current screening practices and allows for individualised risk stratification of patients. The use of these biomarkers appears to increase the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of prostate cancer. Further studies are necessary to define the appropriate use and time points of each biomarker and their effect on the management algorithm of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5153438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51534382016-12-19 Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark? McGrath, Shannon Christidis, Daniel Perera, Marlon Hong, Sung Kyu Manning, Todd Vela, Ian Lawrentschuk, Nathan Prostate Int Review Article PURPOSE: Localised prostate cancer diagnosis and management is increasingly complex due to its heterogeneous progression and prognostic subgroups. Pitfalls in current screening and diagnosis have prompted the search for accurate and invasive molecular and genetic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Such tools may be able to distinguish clinically significant cancers from less aggressive variants to assist with prostate cancer risk stratification and guide decisions and healthcare algorithms. We aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the current prostate cancer biomarkers available and in development. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases searches were conducted to identify articles pertaining to the use of novel biomarkers for prostate cancer. RESULTS: A growing number of novel biomarkers are currently under investigation. Such markers include urinary biomarkers, serology-based markers or pathological tissue assessments of molecular and genetic markers. While limited clinical data is present for analysis, early results appear promising. Specifically, a combination of serum and urinary biomarkers (Serum PSA + Urinary PCA3 + Urinary TMPRSS2-ERG fusion) appears to provide superior sensitivity and specificity profiles compared to traditional diagnostic approaches (AUC 0.88). CONCLUSION: The accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer is critical to ensure appropriate intervention. The development of non-invasive biomarkers can add to the information provided by current screening practices and allows for individualised risk stratification of patients. The use of these biomarkers appears to increase the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of prostate cancer. Further studies are necessary to define the appropriate use and time points of each biomarker and their effect on the management algorithm of prostate cancer. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2016-12 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5153438/ /pubmed/27995111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.002 Text en Copyright © 2016 Asian Pacific Prostate Society, Published by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
McGrath, Shannon
Christidis, Daniel
Perera, Marlon
Hong, Sung Kyu
Manning, Todd
Vela, Ian
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title_full Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title_fullStr Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title_short Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?
title_sort prostate cancer biomarkers: are we hitting the mark?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathshannon prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT christidisdaniel prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT pereramarlon prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT hongsungkyu prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT manningtodd prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT velaian prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark
AT lawrentschuknathan prostatecancerbiomarkersarewehittingthemark