Cargando…

Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model

Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poranki, D., Goodwin, C., Van Dyke, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28025638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912
_version_ 1782474702676033536
author Poranki, D.
Goodwin, C.
Van Dyke, M.
author_facet Poranki, D.
Goodwin, C.
Van Dyke, M.
author_sort Poranki, D.
collection PubMed
description Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5153489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51534892016-12-26 Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model Poranki, D. Goodwin, C. Van Dyke, M. Biomed Res Int Research Article Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5153489/ /pubmed/28025638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912 Text en Copyright © 2016 D. Poranki et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poranki, D.
Goodwin, C.
Van Dyke, M.
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_full Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_fullStr Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_short Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_sort assessment of deep partial thickness burn treatment with keratin biomaterial hydrogels in a swine model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28025638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912
work_keys_str_mv AT porankid assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel
AT goodwinc assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel
AT vandykem assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel