Cargando…
Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27958301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700 |
_version_ | 1782474774643998720 |
---|---|
author | Peschke, Claudia Köster, Raphael Korsch, Margarethe Frühholz, Sascha Thiel, Christiane M. Herrmann, Manfred Hilgetag, Claus C. |
author_facet | Peschke, Claudia Köster, Raphael Korsch, Margarethe Frühholz, Sascha Thiel, Christiane M. Herrmann, Manfred Hilgetag, Claus C. |
author_sort | Peschke, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study. The fMRI approach aimed at localizing brain regions involved in interference resolution induced by single Flanker (stimulus-stimulus, S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response, S-R) conflicts as well as regions involved in the double conflict condition. The data revealed a distinct activation in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) for Flanker interference and in the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) for the double interference condition. The causal functional role of these brain regions was then examined in the same volunteers by using offline TMS over right IPS and right MFG. TMS perturbation of the right IPS increased the Flanker effect, but had no effect in the Simon or double conflict condition. In contrast, perturbation of the right MFG had no effect on any of the conflict types. These findings suggest a causal role of the right IPS in the processing of the single conflict of Flanker (stimulus-stimulus) interference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5153836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51538362016-12-28 Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study Peschke, Claudia Köster, Raphael Korsch, Margarethe Frühholz, Sascha Thiel, Christiane M. Herrmann, Manfred Hilgetag, Claus C. Sci Rep Article We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study. The fMRI approach aimed at localizing brain regions involved in interference resolution induced by single Flanker (stimulus-stimulus, S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response, S-R) conflicts as well as regions involved in the double conflict condition. The data revealed a distinct activation in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) for Flanker interference and in the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) for the double interference condition. The causal functional role of these brain regions was then examined in the same volunteers by using offline TMS over right IPS and right MFG. TMS perturbation of the right IPS increased the Flanker effect, but had no effect in the Simon or double conflict condition. In contrast, perturbation of the right MFG had no effect on any of the conflict types. These findings suggest a causal role of the right IPS in the processing of the single conflict of Flanker (stimulus-stimulus) interference. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5153836/ /pubmed/27958301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Peschke, Claudia Köster, Raphael Korsch, Margarethe Frühholz, Sascha Thiel, Christiane M. Herrmann, Manfred Hilgetag, Claus C. Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title | Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title_full | Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title_fullStr | Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title_short | Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study |
title_sort | selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–a combined fmri and rtms study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27958301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peschkeclaudia selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT kosterraphael selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT korschmargarethe selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT fruhholzsascha selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT thielchristianem selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT herrmannmanfred selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy AT hilgetagclausc selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy |