Cargando…

Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study

We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peschke, Claudia, Köster, Raphael, Korsch, Margarethe, Frühholz, Sascha, Thiel, Christiane M., Herrmann, Manfred, Hilgetag, Claus C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27958301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700
_version_ 1782474774643998720
author Peschke, Claudia
Köster, Raphael
Korsch, Margarethe
Frühholz, Sascha
Thiel, Christiane M.
Herrmann, Manfred
Hilgetag, Claus C.
author_facet Peschke, Claudia
Köster, Raphael
Korsch, Margarethe
Frühholz, Sascha
Thiel, Christiane M.
Herrmann, Manfred
Hilgetag, Claus C.
author_sort Peschke, Claudia
collection PubMed
description We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study. The fMRI approach aimed at localizing brain regions involved in interference resolution induced by single Flanker (stimulus-stimulus, S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response, S-R) conflicts as well as regions involved in the double conflict condition. The data revealed a distinct activation in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) for Flanker interference and in the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) for the double interference condition. The causal functional role of these brain regions was then examined in the same volunteers by using offline TMS over right IPS and right MFG. TMS perturbation of the right IPS increased the Flanker effect, but had no effect in the Simon or double conflict condition. In contrast, perturbation of the right MFG had no effect on any of the conflict types. These findings suggest a causal role of the right IPS in the processing of the single conflict of Flanker (stimulus-stimulus) interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5153836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51538362016-12-28 Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study Peschke, Claudia Köster, Raphael Korsch, Margarethe Frühholz, Sascha Thiel, Christiane M. Herrmann, Manfred Hilgetag, Claus C. Sci Rep Article We investigated if single and double conflicts are processed separately in different brain regions and if they are differentially vulnerable to TMS perturbation. Fifteen human volunteers performed a single (Flanker or Simon) conflict task or a double (Flanker and Simon) conflict task in a combined functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study. The fMRI approach aimed at localizing brain regions involved in interference resolution induced by single Flanker (stimulus-stimulus, S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response, S-R) conflicts as well as regions involved in the double conflict condition. The data revealed a distinct activation in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) for Flanker interference and in the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) for the double interference condition. The causal functional role of these brain regions was then examined in the same volunteers by using offline TMS over right IPS and right MFG. TMS perturbation of the right IPS increased the Flanker effect, but had no effect in the Simon or double conflict condition. In contrast, perturbation of the right MFG had no effect on any of the conflict types. These findings suggest a causal role of the right IPS in the processing of the single conflict of Flanker (stimulus-stimulus) interference. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5153836/ /pubmed/27958301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Peschke, Claudia
Köster, Raphael
Korsch, Margarethe
Frühholz, Sascha
Thiel, Christiane M.
Herrmann, Manfred
Hilgetag, Claus C.
Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title_full Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title_fullStr Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title_full_unstemmed Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title_short Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
title_sort selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–a combined fmri and rtms study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27958301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38700
work_keys_str_mv AT peschkeclaudia selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT kosterraphael selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT korschmargarethe selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT fruhholzsascha selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT thielchristianem selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT herrmannmanfred selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy
AT hilgetagclausc selectiveperturbationofcognitiveconflictinthehumanbrainacombinedfmriandrtmsstudy