Cargando…

Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy are common and often accepted as a ‘normal’ part of pregnancy. Many women receive little in the way of treatment, and yet pain interferes with sleep, daily activities and work and leads to increasing requests for induction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bishop, Annette, Ogollah, Reuben, Bartlam, Bernadette, Barlas, Panos, Holden, Melanie A., Ismail, Khaled M., Jowett, Sue, Lewis, Martyn, Lloyd, Alison, Kettle, Christine, Kigozi, Jesse, Foster, Nadine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0107-6
_version_ 1782474790426116096
author Bishop, Annette
Ogollah, Reuben
Bartlam, Bernadette
Barlas, Panos
Holden, Melanie A.
Ismail, Khaled M.
Jowett, Sue
Lewis, Martyn
Lloyd, Alison
Kettle, Christine
Kigozi, Jesse
Foster, Nadine E.
author_facet Bishop, Annette
Ogollah, Reuben
Bartlam, Bernadette
Barlas, Panos
Holden, Melanie A.
Ismail, Khaled M.
Jowett, Sue
Lewis, Martyn
Lloyd, Alison
Kettle, Christine
Kigozi, Jesse
Foster, Nadine E.
author_sort Bishop, Annette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy are common and often accepted as a ‘normal’ part of pregnancy. Many women receive little in the way of treatment, and yet pain interferes with sleep, daily activities and work and leads to increasing requests for induction of labour or elective caesarean section. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a full RCT evaluating the benefit of acupuncture for pregnancy-related back pain. METHODS: This study is a single-centre, three-arm pilot RCT in one large maternity unit and associated antenatal and physiotherapy clinics. Women were eligible if they had pregnancy-related LBP with or without PGP. Exclusions included a history of miscarriage, high risk of early labour or pre-eclampsia, PGP only and previous acupuncture. Interventions were standard care (SC): a self-management booklet with physiotherapy if needed. SC+TA: the booklet and physiotherapy comprising true (penetrating) acupuncture, advice and exercise. SC+NPA: the booklet and physiotherapy comprising non-penetrating acupuncture, advice and exercise. Remote telephone randomisation used a 1:1:1 allocation ratio stratified by gestational weeks. Three measures of pain/function were compared to inform the primary outcome measure in a full RCT: the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and 11-point 0–10 numerical rating scale for pain. Analysis focused on process evaluation of recruitment, retention, descriptive information on outcomes, adherence to treatment, occurrence of adverse events and impact of physiotherapist training. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five women were randomised (45% of those eligible) between April and October 2013; 73% (n = 91) provided 8-week follow-up data. Three of six recruitment methods accounted for 82% of total uptake: screening questionnaire at the 20-week scan, community midwives issuing study cards, and self-referral following local awareness initiatives. Physiotherapists’ self-confidence on managing pregnancy-related LBP improved post training. The PGQ is suitable as the primary outcome in a full trial. The average number of treatment sessions in both SC+TA and SC+NPA was six (in line with treatment protocols). No serious adverse events attributable to the trial treatments were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A full RCT is feasible and would provide evidence about the effectiveness of acupuncture and inform treatment choices for women with pregnancy-related LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN49955124
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5153914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51539142016-12-13 Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124) Bishop, Annette Ogollah, Reuben Bartlam, Bernadette Barlas, Panos Holden, Melanie A. Ismail, Khaled M. Jowett, Sue Lewis, Martyn Lloyd, Alison Kettle, Christine Kigozi, Jesse Foster, Nadine E. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy are common and often accepted as a ‘normal’ part of pregnancy. Many women receive little in the way of treatment, and yet pain interferes with sleep, daily activities and work and leads to increasing requests for induction of labour or elective caesarean section. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a full RCT evaluating the benefit of acupuncture for pregnancy-related back pain. METHODS: This study is a single-centre, three-arm pilot RCT in one large maternity unit and associated antenatal and physiotherapy clinics. Women were eligible if they had pregnancy-related LBP with or without PGP. Exclusions included a history of miscarriage, high risk of early labour or pre-eclampsia, PGP only and previous acupuncture. Interventions were standard care (SC): a self-management booklet with physiotherapy if needed. SC+TA: the booklet and physiotherapy comprising true (penetrating) acupuncture, advice and exercise. SC+NPA: the booklet and physiotherapy comprising non-penetrating acupuncture, advice and exercise. Remote telephone randomisation used a 1:1:1 allocation ratio stratified by gestational weeks. Three measures of pain/function were compared to inform the primary outcome measure in a full RCT: the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and 11-point 0–10 numerical rating scale for pain. Analysis focused on process evaluation of recruitment, retention, descriptive information on outcomes, adherence to treatment, occurrence of adverse events and impact of physiotherapist training. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five women were randomised (45% of those eligible) between April and October 2013; 73% (n = 91) provided 8-week follow-up data. Three of six recruitment methods accounted for 82% of total uptake: screening questionnaire at the 20-week scan, community midwives issuing study cards, and self-referral following local awareness initiatives. Physiotherapists’ self-confidence on managing pregnancy-related LBP improved post training. The PGQ is suitable as the primary outcome in a full trial. The average number of treatment sessions in both SC+TA and SC+NPA was six (in line with treatment protocols). No serious adverse events attributable to the trial treatments were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A full RCT is feasible and would provide evidence about the effectiveness of acupuncture and inform treatment choices for women with pregnancy-related LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN49955124 BioMed Central 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5153914/ /pubmed/27965887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0107-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bishop, Annette
Ogollah, Reuben
Bartlam, Bernadette
Barlas, Panos
Holden, Melanie A.
Ismail, Khaled M.
Jowett, Sue
Lewis, Martyn
Lloyd, Alison
Kettle, Christine
Kigozi, Jesse
Foster, Nadine E.
Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title_full Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title_fullStr Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title_short Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124)
title_sort evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the ease back pilot randomised controlled trial (isrctn49955124)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0107-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopannette evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT ogollahreuben evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT bartlambernadette evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT barlaspanos evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT holdenmelaniea evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT ismailkhaledm evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT jowettsue evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT lewismartyn evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT lloydalison evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT kettlechristine evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT kigozijesse evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT fosternadinee evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124
AT evaluatingacupunctureandstandardcareforpregnantwomenwithbackpaintheeasebackpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn49955124