Cargando…

Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region

OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vong, Sirenda, Samuel, Reuben, Gould, Philip, El Sakka, Hammam, Rana, Bardan J, Pinyowiwat, Vason, Bezbaruah, Supriya, Ofrin, Roderico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Health Organization 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441
_version_ 1782474794007003136
author Vong, Sirenda
Samuel, Reuben
Gould, Philip
El Sakka, Hammam
Rana, Bardan J
Pinyowiwat, Vason
Bezbaruah, Supriya
Ofrin, Roderico
author_facet Vong, Sirenda
Samuel, Reuben
Gould, Philip
El Sakka, Hammam
Rana, Bardan J
Pinyowiwat, Vason
Bezbaruah, Supriya
Ofrin, Roderico
author_sort Vong, Sirenda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conducted 4–5 day missions to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste. We collected information through guided discussions with senior technical leaders and visits to hospitals, laboratories and airports. We assessed each country’s Ebola virus disease preparedness on 41 tasks under nine key components adapted from the WHO Ebola preparedness checklist of January 2015. FINDINGS: Political commitment to Ebola preparedness was high in all countries. Planning was most advanced for components that had been previously planned or tested for influenza pandemics: multilevel and multisectoral coordination; multidisciplinary rapid response teams; public communication and social mobilization; drills in international airports; and training on personal protective equipment. Major vulnerabilities included inadequate risk assessment and risk communication; gaps in data management and analysis for event surveillance; and limited capacity in molecular diagnostic techniques. Many countries had limited planning for a surge of Ebola cases. Other tasks needing improvement included: advice to inbound travellers; adequate isolation rooms; appropriate infection control practices; triage systems in hospitals; laboratory diagnostic capacity; contact tracing; and danger pay to staff to ensure continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Joint assessment and feedback about the functionality of Ebola virus preparedness systems help countries strengthen their core capacities to meet the International Health Regulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5153931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher World Health Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51539312016-12-19 Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region Vong, Sirenda Samuel, Reuben Gould, Philip El Sakka, Hammam Rana, Bardan J Pinyowiwat, Vason Bezbaruah, Supriya Ofrin, Roderico Bull World Health Organ Research OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conducted 4–5 day missions to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste. We collected information through guided discussions with senior technical leaders and visits to hospitals, laboratories and airports. We assessed each country’s Ebola virus disease preparedness on 41 tasks under nine key components adapted from the WHO Ebola preparedness checklist of January 2015. FINDINGS: Political commitment to Ebola preparedness was high in all countries. Planning was most advanced for components that had been previously planned or tested for influenza pandemics: multilevel and multisectoral coordination; multidisciplinary rapid response teams; public communication and social mobilization; drills in international airports; and training on personal protective equipment. Major vulnerabilities included inadequate risk assessment and risk communication; gaps in data management and analysis for event surveillance; and limited capacity in molecular diagnostic techniques. Many countries had limited planning for a surge of Ebola cases. Other tasks needing improvement included: advice to inbound travellers; adequate isolation rooms; appropriate infection control practices; triage systems in hospitals; laboratory diagnostic capacity; contact tracing; and danger pay to staff to ensure continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Joint assessment and feedback about the functionality of Ebola virus preparedness systems help countries strengthen their core capacities to meet the International Health Regulations. World Health Organization 2016-12-01 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5153931/ /pubmed/27994284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441 Text en (c) 2016 The authors; licensee World Health Organization. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Vong, Sirenda
Samuel, Reuben
Gould, Philip
El Sakka, Hammam
Rana, Bardan J
Pinyowiwat, Vason
Bezbaruah, Supriya
Ofrin, Roderico
Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title_full Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title_fullStr Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title_short Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
title_sort assessment of ebola virus disease preparedness in the who south-east asia region
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441
work_keys_str_mv AT vongsirenda assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT samuelreuben assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT gouldphilip assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT elsakkahammam assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT ranabardanj assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT pinyowiwatvason assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT bezbaruahsupriya assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT ofrinroderico assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion