Cargando…
Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region
OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conduct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
World Health Organization
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441 |
_version_ | 1782474794007003136 |
---|---|
author | Vong, Sirenda Samuel, Reuben Gould, Philip El Sakka, Hammam Rana, Bardan J Pinyowiwat, Vason Bezbaruah, Supriya Ofrin, Roderico |
author_facet | Vong, Sirenda Samuel, Reuben Gould, Philip El Sakka, Hammam Rana, Bardan J Pinyowiwat, Vason Bezbaruah, Supriya Ofrin, Roderico |
author_sort | Vong, Sirenda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conducted 4–5 day missions to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste. We collected information through guided discussions with senior technical leaders and visits to hospitals, laboratories and airports. We assessed each country’s Ebola virus disease preparedness on 41 tasks under nine key components adapted from the WHO Ebola preparedness checklist of January 2015. FINDINGS: Political commitment to Ebola preparedness was high in all countries. Planning was most advanced for components that had been previously planned or tested for influenza pandemics: multilevel and multisectoral coordination; multidisciplinary rapid response teams; public communication and social mobilization; drills in international airports; and training on personal protective equipment. Major vulnerabilities included inadequate risk assessment and risk communication; gaps in data management and analysis for event surveillance; and limited capacity in molecular diagnostic techniques. Many countries had limited planning for a surge of Ebola cases. Other tasks needing improvement included: advice to inbound travellers; adequate isolation rooms; appropriate infection control practices; triage systems in hospitals; laboratory diagnostic capacity; contact tracing; and danger pay to staff to ensure continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Joint assessment and feedback about the functionality of Ebola virus preparedness systems help countries strengthen their core capacities to meet the International Health Regulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5153931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | World Health Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51539312016-12-19 Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region Vong, Sirenda Samuel, Reuben Gould, Philip El Sakka, Hammam Rana, Bardan J Pinyowiwat, Vason Bezbaruah, Supriya Ofrin, Roderico Bull World Health Organ Research OBJECTIVE: To conduct assessments of Ebola virus disease preparedness in countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region. METHODS: Nine of 11 countries in the region agreed to be assessed. During February to November 2015 a joint team from WHO and ministries of health conducted 4–5 day missions to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste. We collected information through guided discussions with senior technical leaders and visits to hospitals, laboratories and airports. We assessed each country’s Ebola virus disease preparedness on 41 tasks under nine key components adapted from the WHO Ebola preparedness checklist of January 2015. FINDINGS: Political commitment to Ebola preparedness was high in all countries. Planning was most advanced for components that had been previously planned or tested for influenza pandemics: multilevel and multisectoral coordination; multidisciplinary rapid response teams; public communication and social mobilization; drills in international airports; and training on personal protective equipment. Major vulnerabilities included inadequate risk assessment and risk communication; gaps in data management and analysis for event surveillance; and limited capacity in molecular diagnostic techniques. Many countries had limited planning for a surge of Ebola cases. Other tasks needing improvement included: advice to inbound travellers; adequate isolation rooms; appropriate infection control practices; triage systems in hospitals; laboratory diagnostic capacity; contact tracing; and danger pay to staff to ensure continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Joint assessment and feedback about the functionality of Ebola virus preparedness systems help countries strengthen their core capacities to meet the International Health Regulations. World Health Organization 2016-12-01 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5153931/ /pubmed/27994284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441 Text en (c) 2016 The authors; licensee World Health Organization. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Vong, Sirenda Samuel, Reuben Gould, Philip El Sakka, Hammam Rana, Bardan J Pinyowiwat, Vason Bezbaruah, Supriya Ofrin, Roderico Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title | Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title_full | Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title_short | Assessment of Ebola virus disease preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region |
title_sort | assessment of ebola virus disease preparedness in the who south-east asia region |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5153931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.174441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vongsirenda assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT samuelreuben assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT gouldphilip assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT elsakkahammam assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT ranabardanj assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT pinyowiwatvason assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT bezbaruahsupriya assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion AT ofrinroderico assessmentofebolavirusdiseasepreparednessinthewhosoutheastasiaregion |