Cargando…

Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study

BACKGROUND: Correct measurement and continuous monitoring of exclusive breastfeeding are essential to promote exclusive breastfeeding. Measuring exclusive breastfeeding is a complex issue as rates can vary according to the definition, measurement period, questions asked, and infant’s age. This artic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanal, Vishnu, Lee, Andy H., Scott, Jane A., Karkee, Rajendra, Binns, Colin W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9
_version_ 1782474795578818560
author Khanal, Vishnu
Lee, Andy H.
Scott, Jane A.
Karkee, Rajendra
Binns, Colin W.
author_facet Khanal, Vishnu
Lee, Andy H.
Scott, Jane A.
Karkee, Rajendra
Binns, Colin W.
author_sort Khanal, Vishnu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Correct measurement and continuous monitoring of exclusive breastfeeding are essential to promote exclusive breastfeeding. Measuring exclusive breastfeeding is a complex issue as rates can vary according to the definition, measurement period, questions asked, and infant’s age. This article reviewed the methodology of reporting exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal, and compared exclusive breastfeeding rates using data from a cohort study undertaken in western Nepal. METHODS: A literature review was first conducted on studies published during 2000–2014. In our cohort study, 735 mother-infant pairs were recruited within the first month postpartum and followed up during the fourth and sixth months. RESULTS: The majority of studies in Nepal, including national surveys, used the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended definition (only breastmilk with the exception of medicine and vitamin syrup), and the most common measurement period was a 24-h recall. Our data demonstrated that the exclusive breastfeeding rate during the sixth month was 8.9% using the recall-since-birth method but was 18.7% using the 24-h recall method. Substantial differences in rates were also found during the first (66.3% vs 83.9%) and fourth months (39.2% vs 61.1%). CONCLUSION: We found that recent studies reporting exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal varied considerably in methodology. The most commonly used measurement, the 24-h recall, leads to over-estimation of the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding when compared to the recall-since-birth method. A common standard of reporting exclusive breastfeeding is clearly needed for evidence-based decision making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5154002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51540022016-12-20 Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study Khanal, Vishnu Lee, Andy H. Scott, Jane A. Karkee, Rajendra Binns, Colin W. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Correct measurement and continuous monitoring of exclusive breastfeeding are essential to promote exclusive breastfeeding. Measuring exclusive breastfeeding is a complex issue as rates can vary according to the definition, measurement period, questions asked, and infant’s age. This article reviewed the methodology of reporting exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal, and compared exclusive breastfeeding rates using data from a cohort study undertaken in western Nepal. METHODS: A literature review was first conducted on studies published during 2000–2014. In our cohort study, 735 mother-infant pairs were recruited within the first month postpartum and followed up during the fourth and sixth months. RESULTS: The majority of studies in Nepal, including national surveys, used the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended definition (only breastmilk with the exception of medicine and vitamin syrup), and the most common measurement period was a 24-h recall. Our data demonstrated that the exclusive breastfeeding rate during the sixth month was 8.9% using the recall-since-birth method but was 18.7% using the 24-h recall method. Substantial differences in rates were also found during the first (66.3% vs 83.9%) and fourth months (39.2% vs 61.1%). CONCLUSION: We found that recent studies reporting exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal varied considerably in methodology. The most commonly used measurement, the 24-h recall, leads to over-estimation of the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding when compared to the recall-since-birth method. A common standard of reporting exclusive breastfeeding is clearly needed for evidence-based decision making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5154002/ /pubmed/27955620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khanal, Vishnu
Lee, Andy H.
Scott, Jane A.
Karkee, Rajendra
Binns, Colin W.
Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title_full Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title_fullStr Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title_short Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
title_sort implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9
work_keys_str_mv AT khanalvishnu implicationsofmethodologicaldifferencesinmeasuringtheratesofexclusivebreastfeedinginnepalfindingsfromliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT leeandyh implicationsofmethodologicaldifferencesinmeasuringtheratesofexclusivebreastfeedinginnepalfindingsfromliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT scottjanea implicationsofmethodologicaldifferencesinmeasuringtheratesofexclusivebreastfeedinginnepalfindingsfromliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT karkeerajendra implicationsofmethodologicaldifferencesinmeasuringtheratesofexclusivebreastfeedinginnepalfindingsfromliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT binnscolinw implicationsofmethodologicaldifferencesinmeasuringtheratesofexclusivebreastfeedinginnepalfindingsfromliteraturereviewandcohortstudy