Cargando…
A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8 |
_version_ | 1782474796963987456 |
---|---|
author | Paleri, Vinidh Wood, Joshua Patterson, Joanne Stocken, Deborah D. Cole, Mike Vale, Luke Franks, Jeremy Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa Donnelly, Rachael Barclay, Stewart Rapley, Tim Rousseau, Nikki |
author_facet | Paleri, Vinidh Wood, Joshua Patterson, Joanne Stocken, Deborah D. Cole, Mike Vale, Luke Franks, Jeremy Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa Donnelly, Rachael Barclay, Stewart Rapley, Tim Rousseau, Nikki |
author_sort | Paleri, Vinidh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % of patients undergoing this treatment requiring nutritional support via gastrostomy (G) or nasogastric (NG) tube feeding. Long-term dysphagia following CRT is a primary concern for patients. The effect of enteral feeding routes on swallowing function is not well understood, and the two feeding methods have, to date, not been compared to assess which leads to a better patient outcome. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two options with particular emphasis on patient willingness to be randomised and clinician willingness to approach eligible patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods multicentre study to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy versus oral feeding plus as required nasogastric tube feeding in patients with HNSCC. A total of 60 participants will be randomised to the two arms of the study (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome of feasibility is a composite of recruitment (willingness to randomise and be randomised) and retention. A qualitative process evaluation investigating patient, family and friends and staff experiences of trial participation will also be conducted alongside an economic modelling exercise to synthesise available evidence and provide estimates of cost-effectiveness and value of information. Participants will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), during CRT weekly, 3 months and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Clinicians are in equipoise over the enteral feeding options for patients being treated with CRT. Swallowing outcomes have been identified as a top priority for patients following treatment and this trial would inform a future larger scale RCT in this area to inform best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48569216 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5154009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51540092016-12-13 A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol Paleri, Vinidh Wood, Joshua Patterson, Joanne Stocken, Deborah D. Cole, Mike Vale, Luke Franks, Jeremy Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa Donnelly, Rachael Barclay, Stewart Rapley, Tim Rousseau, Nikki Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % of patients undergoing this treatment requiring nutritional support via gastrostomy (G) or nasogastric (NG) tube feeding. Long-term dysphagia following CRT is a primary concern for patients. The effect of enteral feeding routes on swallowing function is not well understood, and the two feeding methods have, to date, not been compared to assess which leads to a better patient outcome. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two options with particular emphasis on patient willingness to be randomised and clinician willingness to approach eligible patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods multicentre study to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy versus oral feeding plus as required nasogastric tube feeding in patients with HNSCC. A total of 60 participants will be randomised to the two arms of the study (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome of feasibility is a composite of recruitment (willingness to randomise and be randomised) and retention. A qualitative process evaluation investigating patient, family and friends and staff experiences of trial participation will also be conducted alongside an economic modelling exercise to synthesise available evidence and provide estimates of cost-effectiveness and value of information. Participants will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), during CRT weekly, 3 months and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Clinicians are in equipoise over the enteral feeding options for patients being treated with CRT. Swallowing outcomes have been identified as a top priority for patients following treatment and this trial would inform a future larger scale RCT in this area to inform best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48569216 BioMed Central 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5154009/ /pubmed/27965848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Paleri, Vinidh Wood, Joshua Patterson, Joanne Stocken, Deborah D. Cole, Mike Vale, Luke Franks, Jeremy Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa Donnelly, Rachael Barclay, Stewart Rapley, Tim Rousseau, Nikki A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title | A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title_full | A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title_fullStr | A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title_short | A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol |
title_sort | feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (tube trial): study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palerivinidh afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT woodjoshua afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT pattersonjoanne afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT stockendeborahd afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT colemike afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT valeluke afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT franksjeremy afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT guerrerourbanoteresa afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT donnellyrachael afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT barclaystewart afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT rapleytim afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT rousseaunikki afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT palerivinidh feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT woodjoshua feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT pattersonjoanne feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT stockendeborahd feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT colemike feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT valeluke feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT franksjeremy feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT guerrerourbanoteresa feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT donnellyrachael feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT barclaystewart feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT rapleytim feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol AT rousseaunikki feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol |