Cargando…

A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol

BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paleri, Vinidh, Wood, Joshua, Patterson, Joanne, Stocken, Deborah D., Cole, Mike, Vale, Luke, Franks, Jeremy, Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa, Donnelly, Rachael, Barclay, Stewart, Rapley, Tim, Rousseau, Nikki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8
_version_ 1782474796963987456
author Paleri, Vinidh
Wood, Joshua
Patterson, Joanne
Stocken, Deborah D.
Cole, Mike
Vale, Luke
Franks, Jeremy
Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa
Donnelly, Rachael
Barclay, Stewart
Rapley, Tim
Rousseau, Nikki
author_facet Paleri, Vinidh
Wood, Joshua
Patterson, Joanne
Stocken, Deborah D.
Cole, Mike
Vale, Luke
Franks, Jeremy
Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa
Donnelly, Rachael
Barclay, Stewart
Rapley, Tim
Rousseau, Nikki
author_sort Paleri, Vinidh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % of patients undergoing this treatment requiring nutritional support via gastrostomy (G) or nasogastric (NG) tube feeding. Long-term dysphagia following CRT is a primary concern for patients. The effect of enteral feeding routes on swallowing function is not well understood, and the two feeding methods have, to date, not been compared to assess which leads to a better patient outcome. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two options with particular emphasis on patient willingness to be randomised and clinician willingness to approach eligible patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods multicentre study to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy versus oral feeding plus as required nasogastric tube feeding in patients with HNSCC. A total of 60 participants will be randomised to the two arms of the study (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome of feasibility is a composite of recruitment (willingness to randomise and be randomised) and retention. A qualitative process evaluation investigating patient, family and friends and staff experiences of trial participation will also be conducted alongside an economic modelling exercise to synthesise available evidence and provide estimates of cost-effectiveness and value of information. Participants will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), during CRT weekly, 3 months and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Clinicians are in equipoise over the enteral feeding options for patients being treated with CRT. Swallowing outcomes have been identified as a top priority for patients following treatment and this trial would inform a future larger scale RCT in this area to inform best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48569216
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5154009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51540092016-12-13 A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol Paleri, Vinidh Wood, Joshua Patterson, Joanne Stocken, Deborah D. Cole, Mike Vale, Luke Franks, Jeremy Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa Donnelly, Rachael Barclay, Stewart Rapley, Tim Rousseau, Nikki Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There are 7000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) treated by the NHS each year. Stage III and IV HNSCC can be treated non-surgically by radio therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT can affect eating and drinking through a range of side effects with 90 % of patients undergoing this treatment requiring nutritional support via gastrostomy (G) or nasogastric (NG) tube feeding. Long-term dysphagia following CRT is a primary concern for patients. The effect of enteral feeding routes on swallowing function is not well understood, and the two feeding methods have, to date, not been compared to assess which leads to a better patient outcome. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two options with particular emphasis on patient willingness to be randomised and clinician willingness to approach eligible patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods multicentre study to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy versus oral feeding plus as required nasogastric tube feeding in patients with HNSCC. A total of 60 participants will be randomised to the two arms of the study (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome of feasibility is a composite of recruitment (willingness to randomise and be randomised) and retention. A qualitative process evaluation investigating patient, family and friends and staff experiences of trial participation will also be conducted alongside an economic modelling exercise to synthesise available evidence and provide estimates of cost-effectiveness and value of information. Participants will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), during CRT weekly, 3 months and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Clinicians are in equipoise over the enteral feeding options for patients being treated with CRT. Swallowing outcomes have been identified as a top priority for patients following treatment and this trial would inform a future larger scale RCT in this area to inform best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48569216 BioMed Central 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5154009/ /pubmed/27965848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Paleri, Vinidh
Wood, Joshua
Patterson, Joanne
Stocken, Deborah D.
Cole, Mike
Vale, Luke
Franks, Jeremy
Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa
Donnelly, Rachael
Barclay, Stewart
Rapley, Tim
Rousseau, Nikki
A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title_full A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title_fullStr A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title_short A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): study protocol
title_sort feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (tube trial): study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0069-8
work_keys_str_mv AT palerivinidh afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT woodjoshua afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT pattersonjoanne afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT stockendeborahd afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT colemike afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT valeluke afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT franksjeremy afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT guerrerourbanoteresa afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT donnellyrachael afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT barclaystewart afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT rapleytim afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT rousseaunikki afeasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT palerivinidh feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT woodjoshua feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT pattersonjoanne feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT stockendeborahd feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT colemike feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT valeluke feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT franksjeremy feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT guerrerourbanoteresa feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT donnellyrachael feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT barclaystewart feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT rapleytim feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol
AT rousseaunikki feasibilitystudyincorporatingapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialoforalfeedingpluspretreatmentgastrostomytubeversusoralfeedingplusasneedednasogastrictubefeedinginpatientsundergoingchemoradiationforheadandneckcancertubetrialstudyprotocol