Cargando…

The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potter, Shelley, Conroy, Elizabeth J., Williamson, Paula R., Thrush, Steven, Whisker, Lisa J., Skillman, Joanna M, Barnes, Nicola L. P., Cutress, Ramsey I., Teasdale, Elizabeth M., Mills, Nicola, Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Branford, Olivier A., McEvoy, Katherina, Jain, Abhilash, Gardiner, Matthew D., Blazeby, Jane M., Holcombe, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8
_version_ 1782474809064554496
author Potter, Shelley
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Williamson, Paula R.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Skillman, Joanna M
Barnes, Nicola L. P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Teasdale, Elizabeth M.
Mills, Nicola
Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Branford, Olivier A.
McEvoy, Katherina
Jain, Abhilash
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Holcombe, Christopher
author_facet Potter, Shelley
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Williamson, Paula R.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Skillman, Joanna M
Barnes, Nicola L. P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Teasdale, Elizabeth M.
Mills, Nicola
Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Branford, Olivier A.
McEvoy, Katherina
Jain, Abhilash
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Holcombe, Christopher
author_sort Potter, Shelley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effectiveness of these techniques. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the best way of comparing treatments, but surgical RCTs are challenging. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study aims to determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic RCT to examine the effectiveness of approaches to IBBR. METHODS/DESIGN: The iBRA study is a trainee-led research collaborative project with four phases: Phase 1 – a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practice. Phase 2 – a multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing IBBR to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Phase 3– an IBBR-RCT acceptability survey and qualitative work to explore patients’ and surgeons’ views of proposed trial designs and candidate outcomes. Phase 4 – phases 1 to 3 will inform the design and conduct of the future RCT. All centres offering IBBR will be encouraged to participate by the breast and plastic surgical professional associations (Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons). Data collected will inform the feasibility of undertaking an RCT by defining current practice and exploring issues surrounding recruitment, selection of comparator arms, choice of primary outcome, sample size, selection criteria, trial conduct, methods of data collection and feasibility of using the trainee collaborative model to recruit patients and collect data. DISCUSSION: The preliminary work undertaken within the iBRA study will determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a definitive RCT in IBBR. It will work with the trainee collaborative to build capacity by creating an infrastructure of research-active breast and plastic surgeons which will facilitate future high-quality research that will ultimately improve outcomes for all women seeking reconstructive surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN37664281
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5154059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51540592016-12-13 The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction Potter, Shelley Conroy, Elizabeth J. Williamson, Paula R. Thrush, Steven Whisker, Lisa J. Skillman, Joanna M Barnes, Nicola L. P. Cutress, Ramsey I. Teasdale, Elizabeth M. Mills, Nicola Mylvaganam, Senthurun Branford, Olivier A. McEvoy, Katherina Jain, Abhilash Gardiner, Matthew D. Blazeby, Jane M. Holcombe, Christopher Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effectiveness of these techniques. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the best way of comparing treatments, but surgical RCTs are challenging. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study aims to determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic RCT to examine the effectiveness of approaches to IBBR. METHODS/DESIGN: The iBRA study is a trainee-led research collaborative project with four phases: Phase 1 – a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practice. Phase 2 – a multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing IBBR to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Phase 3– an IBBR-RCT acceptability survey and qualitative work to explore patients’ and surgeons’ views of proposed trial designs and candidate outcomes. Phase 4 – phases 1 to 3 will inform the design and conduct of the future RCT. All centres offering IBBR will be encouraged to participate by the breast and plastic surgical professional associations (Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons). Data collected will inform the feasibility of undertaking an RCT by defining current practice and exploring issues surrounding recruitment, selection of comparator arms, choice of primary outcome, sample size, selection criteria, trial conduct, methods of data collection and feasibility of using the trainee collaborative model to recruit patients and collect data. DISCUSSION: The preliminary work undertaken within the iBRA study will determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a definitive RCT in IBBR. It will work with the trainee collaborative to build capacity by creating an infrastructure of research-active breast and plastic surgeons which will facilitate future high-quality research that will ultimately improve outcomes for all women seeking reconstructive surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN37664281 BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5154059/ /pubmed/27965859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Potter, Shelley
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Williamson, Paula R.
Thrush, Steven
Whisker, Lisa J.
Skillman, Joanna M
Barnes, Nicola L. P.
Cutress, Ramsey I.
Teasdale, Elizabeth M.
Mills, Nicola
Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Branford, Olivier A.
McEvoy, Katherina
Jain, Abhilash
Gardiner, Matthew D.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Holcombe, Christopher
The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title_full The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title_fullStr The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title_short The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
title_sort ibra (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pottershelley theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT conroyelizabethj theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT williamsonpaular theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT thrushsteven theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT whiskerlisaj theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT skillmanjoannam theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT barnesnicolalp theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT cutressramseyi theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT teasdaleelizabethm theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT millsnicola theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT mylvaganamsenthurun theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT branfordoliviera theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT mcevoykatherina theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT jainabhilash theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT gardinermatthewd theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT blazebyjanem theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT holcombechristopher theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT theibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT pottershelley ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT conroyelizabethj ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT williamsonpaular ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT thrushsteven ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT whiskerlisaj ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT skillmanjoannam ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT barnesnicolalp ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT cutressramseyi ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT teasdaleelizabethm ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT millsnicola ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT mylvaganamsenthurun ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT branfordoliviera ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT mcevoykatherina ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT jainabhilash ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT gardinermatthewd ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT blazebyjanem ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT holcombechristopher ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT ibraimplantbreastreconstructionevaluationstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrecohortstudytoinformthefeasibilitydesignandconductofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingnewtechniquesofimplantbasedbreastreconstruction