Cargando…

Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a perennial problem. Calls have been made for trialists to make recruitment performance publicly available. This article presents our experience of recruiting to a pilot RCT of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with bowel cancer wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubbard, Gill, Campbell, Anna, Davies, Zoe, Munro, Julie, Ireland, Aileen V, Leslie, Stephen, Watson, Angus JM, Treweek, Shaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0009-z
_version_ 1782474816886931456
author Hubbard, Gill
Campbell, Anna
Davies, Zoe
Munro, Julie
Ireland, Aileen V
Leslie, Stephen
Watson, Angus JM
Treweek, Shaun
author_facet Hubbard, Gill
Campbell, Anna
Davies, Zoe
Munro, Julie
Ireland, Aileen V
Leslie, Stephen
Watson, Angus JM
Treweek, Shaun
author_sort Hubbard, Gill
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a perennial problem. Calls have been made for trialists to make recruitment performance publicly available. This article presents our experience of recruiting to a pilot RCT of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with bowel cancer with an embedded process evaluation. METHODS: Recruitment took place at three UK hospitals. Recruitment figures were based on the following: i) estimated number of patient admissions, ii) number of patients likely to meet inclusion criteria from clinician input and iii) recruitment rates in previous studies. The following recruitment procedure was used: 1. Nurse assessed patients for eligibility. 2. Patients signed a screening form indicating interest in and agreement to be approached by a researcher about the study. 3. An appointment was made at which the patient signed a consent form and was randomised to the intervention or control group. Information about all patients considered for the study and subsequently included or excluded at each stage of the recruitment process and reasons given were recorded. RESULTS: There were variations in the time taken to award Research Management approval to run the study at the three sites (45–359 days). Sixty-two percent of the original recruitment estimate was reached. The main reason for under-recruitment was due to over-estimation of the number of patient admissions; other reasons were i) not assessing all patients for eligibility, ii) not completing a screening form for eligible patients and iii) patients who signed a screening form being lost to the study before consenting and randomisation. CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trials should not simply aim to improve recruitment estimates but should also identify factors likely to influence recruitment performance in a future trial and inform the development of that trial’s recruitment strategies. Pilot trials are a crucial part of RCT design. Nevertheless, pilot trials are likely to be small scale, involving only a small number of sites, and contextual differences between sites are likely to impact recruitment performance in any future trial. This means that ongoing monitoring and evaluation in trials are likely to be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN63510637; UKCRN id 14092.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5154094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51540942016-12-13 Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment Hubbard, Gill Campbell, Anna Davies, Zoe Munro, Julie Ireland, Aileen V Leslie, Stephen Watson, Angus JM Treweek, Shaun Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a perennial problem. Calls have been made for trialists to make recruitment performance publicly available. This article presents our experience of recruiting to a pilot RCT of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with bowel cancer with an embedded process evaluation. METHODS: Recruitment took place at three UK hospitals. Recruitment figures were based on the following: i) estimated number of patient admissions, ii) number of patients likely to meet inclusion criteria from clinician input and iii) recruitment rates in previous studies. The following recruitment procedure was used: 1. Nurse assessed patients for eligibility. 2. Patients signed a screening form indicating interest in and agreement to be approached by a researcher about the study. 3. An appointment was made at which the patient signed a consent form and was randomised to the intervention or control group. Information about all patients considered for the study and subsequently included or excluded at each stage of the recruitment process and reasons given were recorded. RESULTS: There were variations in the time taken to award Research Management approval to run the study at the three sites (45–359 days). Sixty-two percent of the original recruitment estimate was reached. The main reason for under-recruitment was due to over-estimation of the number of patient admissions; other reasons were i) not assessing all patients for eligibility, ii) not completing a screening form for eligible patients and iii) patients who signed a screening form being lost to the study before consenting and randomisation. CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trials should not simply aim to improve recruitment estimates but should also identify factors likely to influence recruitment performance in a future trial and inform the development of that trial’s recruitment strategies. Pilot trials are a crucial part of RCT design. Nevertheless, pilot trials are likely to be small scale, involving only a small number of sites, and contextual differences between sites are likely to impact recruitment performance in any future trial. This means that ongoing monitoring and evaluation in trials are likely to be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN63510637; UKCRN id 14092. BioMed Central 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5154094/ /pubmed/27965794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0009-z Text en © Hubbard et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hubbard, Gill
Campbell, Anna
Davies, Zoe
Munro, Julie
Ireland, Aileen V
Leslie, Stephen
Watson, Angus JM
Treweek, Shaun
Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title_full Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title_fullStr Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title_short Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
title_sort experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with bowel cancer (crib) with an embedded process evaluation: lessons learned to improve recruitment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0009-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hubbardgill experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT campbellanna experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT davieszoe experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT munrojulie experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT irelandaileenv experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT lesliestephen experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT watsonangusjm experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment
AT treweekshaun experiencesofrecruitingtoapilottrialofcardiacrehabilitationinpatientswithbowelcancercribwithanembeddedprocessevaluationlessonslearnedtoimproverecruitment