Cargando…
Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential pre-requisite for delivering high precision radiotherapy. We compared daily variation detected by two non-ionizing imaging modalities (surface imaging and trans-abdominal ultrasound, US) to verify prostate patient setup and internal organ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0734-3 |
_version_ | 1782474822504153088 |
---|---|
author | Krengli, Marco Loi, Gianfranco Pisani, Carla Beldì, Debora Apicella, Giuseppina Amisano, Valentina Brambilla, Marco |
author_facet | Krengli, Marco Loi, Gianfranco Pisani, Carla Beldì, Debora Apicella, Giuseppina Amisano, Valentina Brambilla, Marco |
author_sort | Krengli, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential pre-requisite for delivering high precision radiotherapy. We compared daily variation detected by two non-ionizing imaging modalities (surface imaging and trans-abdominal ultrasound, US) to verify prostate patient setup and internal organ variations. METHODS: Forty patients with organ confined prostate cancer and candidates to curative radiotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. At each treatment session, after laser alignment, all patients received imaging by a 3D-surface and a 3D-US system. The shifts along the three directions (anterior-posterior AP, cranial-caudal CC, and later-lateral LL) were measured in terms of systematic and random errors. Then, we performed statistical analysis on the differences and the possible correlations between the two modalities. RESULTS: For both IGRT modalities, surface imaging and US, 1318 acquisitions were collected. According with Shapiro Wilk test, the positioning error distributions were not Gaussian for both modalities. The differences between the systematic errors detected by the two modalities were statistically significant only in LL direction (p < 0.05), while the differences between the random errors were not statistically significant in any directions. The 95% confidence interval of the residual errors obtained by subtracting the random errors detected with surface images to those detected with US was included in the range from −7 mm to 7 mm corresponding to the minimum PTV margin adopted in AP direction in our clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: From our data, it emerges that setup misalignments measured by surface imaging can be predictive of US displacements after the adjustment for systematic errors. Moreover, surface imaging can detect setup errors predictive of registration errors measured by US. This data suggest that the two IGRT modalities could be considered as complementary to each other and could represent a daily “low-cost” and non-invasive IGRT modality in prostate cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5154119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51541192016-12-20 Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer Krengli, Marco Loi, Gianfranco Pisani, Carla Beldì, Debora Apicella, Giuseppina Amisano, Valentina Brambilla, Marco Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential pre-requisite for delivering high precision radiotherapy. We compared daily variation detected by two non-ionizing imaging modalities (surface imaging and trans-abdominal ultrasound, US) to verify prostate patient setup and internal organ variations. METHODS: Forty patients with organ confined prostate cancer and candidates to curative radiotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. At each treatment session, after laser alignment, all patients received imaging by a 3D-surface and a 3D-US system. The shifts along the three directions (anterior-posterior AP, cranial-caudal CC, and later-lateral LL) were measured in terms of systematic and random errors. Then, we performed statistical analysis on the differences and the possible correlations between the two modalities. RESULTS: For both IGRT modalities, surface imaging and US, 1318 acquisitions were collected. According with Shapiro Wilk test, the positioning error distributions were not Gaussian for both modalities. The differences between the systematic errors detected by the two modalities were statistically significant only in LL direction (p < 0.05), while the differences between the random errors were not statistically significant in any directions. The 95% confidence interval of the residual errors obtained by subtracting the random errors detected with surface images to those detected with US was included in the range from −7 mm to 7 mm corresponding to the minimum PTV margin adopted in AP direction in our clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: From our data, it emerges that setup misalignments measured by surface imaging can be predictive of US displacements after the adjustment for systematic errors. Moreover, surface imaging can detect setup errors predictive of registration errors measured by US. This data suggest that the two IGRT modalities could be considered as complementary to each other and could represent a daily “low-cost” and non-invasive IGRT modality in prostate cancer patients. BioMed Central 2016-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5154119/ /pubmed/27955693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0734-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Krengli, Marco Loi, Gianfranco Pisani, Carla Beldì, Debora Apicella, Giuseppina Amisano, Valentina Brambilla, Marco Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title | Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title_full | Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title_short | Three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily IGRT of prostate cancer |
title_sort | three-dimensional surface and ultrasound imaging for daily igrt of prostate cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0734-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krenglimarco threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT loigianfranco threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT pisanicarla threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT beldidebora threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT apicellagiuseppina threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT amisanovalentina threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer AT brambillamarco threedimensionalsurfaceandultrasoundimagingfordailyigrtofprostatecancer |