Cargando…

Medical students’ feedback regarding their clinical learning environment in primary healthcare: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: An increasing part of medical students’ learning takes place in primary healthcare (PHC) but little is known about how the students perceive PHC as a clinical learning environment. This study aimed to explore medical students’ perceptions of the clinical learning environment in PHC and h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salminen, Helena, Öhman, Eva, Stenfors-Hayes, Terese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27964713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0837-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: An increasing part of medical students’ learning takes place in primary healthcare (PHC) but little is known about how the students perceive PHC as a clinical learning environment. This study aimed to explore medical students’ perceptions of the clinical learning environment in PHC and how these vary with stage of education. METHODS: Free-text course evaluation comments from students in nine different semesters during spring 2014 were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The students had placements in PHC from the first semester, progressing through the whole 5.5 year medical programme, and this was their main clinical training environment during the final 11(th) semester. RESULTS: In total, 800 students (56%) agreed to participate in the study and 437 of these (54%) provided comments. Two overall themes were identified: the supervisor was the central factor that determined the meaningfulness of the placement at all stages of the education, and basic prerequisites for perceived clinical learning were to have an active role in an authentic clinical context and to be trusted to work independently with patients. The three main categories found under these themes were: i) the perceived relationship with the supervisor; ii) the perceived journey to become a doctor; and iii) the perceived structure and culture. CONCLUSION: The supervisor’s role was perceived as central at all stages of the education but the focus changed for other aspects, related to the students’ professional development. The need for trust and independence in patient work increased towards the end of the education.