Cargando…
Use of a saline-coupled bipolar sealer open liver resection for hepatic malignancy: Medical resource use and costs
AIM: To evaluate outcomes associated with use of a saline coupled bipolar sealer during open partial liver resection. METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized the United States Premier™ insurance claims database (2010-2014). Patients were selected with codes for liver malignancy and partial hep...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i46.10189 |
Sumario: | AIM: To evaluate outcomes associated with use of a saline coupled bipolar sealer during open partial liver resection. METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized the United States Premier™ insurance claims database (2010-2014). Patients were selected with codes for liver malignancy and partial hepatectomy or lobectomy. Cases were defined by use the saline-coupled bipolar sealer; controls had no use. A Propensity Score algorithm was used to match one case to five controls. A deviation-based cost modeling (DBCM) approach provided an estimate of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four cases and 720 controls were available for analysis. Patients in the case cohort received fewer transfusions vs controls (18.1% vs 29.4%, P = 0.007). In DBCM, more patients in the case cohort experienced “on-course” hospitalizations (53.5% vs 41.9%, P = 0.009). The cost calculation showed an average savings in total hospitalization costs of $1027 for cases vs controls. In multivariate analysis, cases had lower odds of receiving a transfusion (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.27-0.71, P = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Use of a saline-coupled bipolar sealer was associated with a greater proportion of patients with an “on course” hospitalization. |
---|