Cargando…

A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening

BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raine, Rosalind, Moss, Sue M, von Wagner, Christian, Atkin, Wendy, Hans, Ines Kralj, Howe, Rosemary, Solmi, Francesca, Morris, Stephen, Counsell, Nicholas, Hackshaw, Allan, Halloran, Stephen, Handley, Graham, Logan, Richard F, Rainbow, Sandra, Smith, Steve, Snowball, Julia, Seaman, Helen, Thomas, Mary, Smith, Samuel G, McGregor, Lesley M, Vart, Gemma, Wardle, Jane, Duffy, Stephen W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365
_version_ 1782474989728956416
author Raine, Rosalind
Moss, Sue M
von Wagner, Christian
Atkin, Wendy
Hans, Ines Kralj
Howe, Rosemary
Solmi, Francesca
Morris, Stephen
Counsell, Nicholas
Hackshaw, Allan
Halloran, Stephen
Handley, Graham
Logan, Richard F
Rainbow, Sandra
Smith, Steve
Snowball, Julia
Seaman, Helen
Thomas, Mary
Smith, Samuel G
McGregor, Lesley M
Vart, Gemma
Wardle, Jane
Duffy, Stephen W
author_facet Raine, Rosalind
Moss, Sue M
von Wagner, Christian
Atkin, Wendy
Hans, Ines Kralj
Howe, Rosemary
Solmi, Francesca
Morris, Stephen
Counsell, Nicholas
Hackshaw, Allan
Halloran, Stephen
Handley, Graham
Logan, Richard F
Rainbow, Sandra
Smith, Steve
Snowball, Julia
Seaman, Helen
Thomas, Mary
Smith, Samuel G
McGregor, Lesley M
Vart, Gemma
Wardle, Jane
Duffy, Stephen W
author_sort Raine, Rosalind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the effectiveness and cost of an enhanced reminder letter with the usual reminder letter on overall uptake of gFOBt and the socioeconomic gradient in uptake. METHODS: We enhanced the usual reminder by including a heading ‘A reminder to you' and a short paragraph restating the offer of screening in simple language. We undertook a cluster-randomised trial of all 168 480 individuals who were due to receive a reminder over 20 days in 2013. Randomisation was based on the day of invitation. Blinding of individuals was not possible, but the possibility of bias was minimal owing to the lack of direct contact with participants. The enhanced reminder was sent to 78 067 individuals and 90 413 received the usual reminder. The primary outcome was the proportion of people adequately screened and its variation by quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation. Data were analysed by logistic regression with conservative variance estimates to take account of cluster randomisation. RESULTS: There was a small but statistically significant (P=0.001) increase in participation with the enhanced reminder (25.8% vs 25.1%). There was significant (P=0.005) heterogeneity of the effect by socioeconomic status with an 11% increase in the odds of participation in the most deprived quintile (from 13.3 to 14.1%) and no increase in the least deprived. We estimated that implementing the enhanced reminder nationally could result in up to 80 more people with high or intermediate risk colorectal adenomas and up to 30 more cancers detected each year if it were implemented nationally. The intervention incurred a small one-off cost of £78 000 to modify the reminder letter. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced reminder increases overall uptake and reduces the socioeconomic gradient in bowel cancer screening participation at little additional cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5155361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51553612017-12-06 A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening Raine, Rosalind Moss, Sue M von Wagner, Christian Atkin, Wendy Hans, Ines Kralj Howe, Rosemary Solmi, Francesca Morris, Stephen Counsell, Nicholas Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Snowball, Julia Seaman, Helen Thomas, Mary Smith, Samuel G McGregor, Lesley M Vart, Gemma Wardle, Jane Duffy, Stephen W Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the effectiveness and cost of an enhanced reminder letter with the usual reminder letter on overall uptake of gFOBt and the socioeconomic gradient in uptake. METHODS: We enhanced the usual reminder by including a heading ‘A reminder to you' and a short paragraph restating the offer of screening in simple language. We undertook a cluster-randomised trial of all 168 480 individuals who were due to receive a reminder over 20 days in 2013. Randomisation was based on the day of invitation. Blinding of individuals was not possible, but the possibility of bias was minimal owing to the lack of direct contact with participants. The enhanced reminder was sent to 78 067 individuals and 90 413 received the usual reminder. The primary outcome was the proportion of people adequately screened and its variation by quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation. Data were analysed by logistic regression with conservative variance estimates to take account of cluster randomisation. RESULTS: There was a small but statistically significant (P=0.001) increase in participation with the enhanced reminder (25.8% vs 25.1%). There was significant (P=0.005) heterogeneity of the effect by socioeconomic status with an 11% increase in the odds of participation in the most deprived quintile (from 13.3 to 14.1%) and no increase in the least deprived. We estimated that implementing the enhanced reminder nationally could result in up to 80 more people with high or intermediate risk colorectal adenomas and up to 30 more cancers detected each year if it were implemented nationally. The intervention incurred a small one-off cost of £78 000 to modify the reminder letter. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced reminder increases overall uptake and reduces the socioeconomic gradient in bowel cancer screening participation at little additional cost. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-06 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5155361/ /pubmed/27875518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Raine, Rosalind
Moss, Sue M
von Wagner, Christian
Atkin, Wendy
Hans, Ines Kralj
Howe, Rosemary
Solmi, Francesca
Morris, Stephen
Counsell, Nicholas
Hackshaw, Allan
Halloran, Stephen
Handley, Graham
Logan, Richard F
Rainbow, Sandra
Smith, Steve
Snowball, Julia
Seaman, Helen
Thomas, Mary
Smith, Samuel G
McGregor, Lesley M
Vart, Gemma
Wardle, Jane
Duffy, Stephen W
A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title_full A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title_fullStr A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title_short A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
title_sort national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365
work_keys_str_mv AT rainerosalind anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT mosssuem anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT vonwagnerchristian anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT atkinwendy anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT hansineskralj anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT howerosemary anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT solmifrancesca anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT morrisstephen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT counsellnicholas anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT hackshawallan anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT halloranstephen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT handleygraham anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT loganrichardf anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT rainbowsandra anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT smithsteve anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT snowballjulia anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT seamanhelen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT thomasmary anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT smithsamuelg anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT mcgregorlesleym anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT vartgemma anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT wardlejane anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT duffystephenw anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT rainerosalind nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT mosssuem nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT vonwagnerchristian nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT atkinwendy nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT hansineskralj nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT howerosemary nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT solmifrancesca nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT morrisstephen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT counsellnicholas nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT hackshawallan nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT halloranstephen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT handleygraham nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT loganrichardf nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT rainbowsandra nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT smithsteve nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT snowballjulia nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT seamanhelen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT thomasmary nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT smithsamuelg nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT mcgregorlesleym nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT vartgemma nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT wardlejane nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening
AT duffystephenw nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening