Cargando…
A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening
BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365 |
_version_ | 1782474989728956416 |
---|---|
author | Raine, Rosalind Moss, Sue M von Wagner, Christian Atkin, Wendy Hans, Ines Kralj Howe, Rosemary Solmi, Francesca Morris, Stephen Counsell, Nicholas Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Snowball, Julia Seaman, Helen Thomas, Mary Smith, Samuel G McGregor, Lesley M Vart, Gemma Wardle, Jane Duffy, Stephen W |
author_facet | Raine, Rosalind Moss, Sue M von Wagner, Christian Atkin, Wendy Hans, Ines Kralj Howe, Rosemary Solmi, Francesca Morris, Stephen Counsell, Nicholas Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Snowball, Julia Seaman, Helen Thomas, Mary Smith, Samuel G McGregor, Lesley M Vart, Gemma Wardle, Jane Duffy, Stephen W |
author_sort | Raine, Rosalind |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the effectiveness and cost of an enhanced reminder letter with the usual reminder letter on overall uptake of gFOBt and the socioeconomic gradient in uptake. METHODS: We enhanced the usual reminder by including a heading ‘A reminder to you' and a short paragraph restating the offer of screening in simple language. We undertook a cluster-randomised trial of all 168 480 individuals who were due to receive a reminder over 20 days in 2013. Randomisation was based on the day of invitation. Blinding of individuals was not possible, but the possibility of bias was minimal owing to the lack of direct contact with participants. The enhanced reminder was sent to 78 067 individuals and 90 413 received the usual reminder. The primary outcome was the proportion of people adequately screened and its variation by quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation. Data were analysed by logistic regression with conservative variance estimates to take account of cluster randomisation. RESULTS: There was a small but statistically significant (P=0.001) increase in participation with the enhanced reminder (25.8% vs 25.1%). There was significant (P=0.005) heterogeneity of the effect by socioeconomic status with an 11% increase in the odds of participation in the most deprived quintile (from 13.3 to 14.1%) and no increase in the least deprived. We estimated that implementing the enhanced reminder nationally could result in up to 80 more people with high or intermediate risk colorectal adenomas and up to 30 more cancers detected each year if it were implemented nationally. The intervention incurred a small one-off cost of £78 000 to modify the reminder letter. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced reminder increases overall uptake and reduces the socioeconomic gradient in bowel cancer screening participation at little additional cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5155361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51553612017-12-06 A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening Raine, Rosalind Moss, Sue M von Wagner, Christian Atkin, Wendy Hans, Ines Kralj Howe, Rosemary Solmi, Francesca Morris, Stephen Counsell, Nicholas Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Snowball, Julia Seaman, Helen Thomas, Mary Smith, Samuel G McGregor, Lesley M Vart, Gemma Wardle, Jane Duffy, Stephen W Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBt). There is a socioeconomic gradient in participation and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have worse colorectal cancer survival than more advantaged groups. We compared the effectiveness and cost of an enhanced reminder letter with the usual reminder letter on overall uptake of gFOBt and the socioeconomic gradient in uptake. METHODS: We enhanced the usual reminder by including a heading ‘A reminder to you' and a short paragraph restating the offer of screening in simple language. We undertook a cluster-randomised trial of all 168 480 individuals who were due to receive a reminder over 20 days in 2013. Randomisation was based on the day of invitation. Blinding of individuals was not possible, but the possibility of bias was minimal owing to the lack of direct contact with participants. The enhanced reminder was sent to 78 067 individuals and 90 413 received the usual reminder. The primary outcome was the proportion of people adequately screened and its variation by quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation. Data were analysed by logistic regression with conservative variance estimates to take account of cluster randomisation. RESULTS: There was a small but statistically significant (P=0.001) increase in participation with the enhanced reminder (25.8% vs 25.1%). There was significant (P=0.005) heterogeneity of the effect by socioeconomic status with an 11% increase in the odds of participation in the most deprived quintile (from 13.3 to 14.1%) and no increase in the least deprived. We estimated that implementing the enhanced reminder nationally could result in up to 80 more people with high or intermediate risk colorectal adenomas and up to 30 more cancers detected each year if it were implemented nationally. The intervention incurred a small one-off cost of £78 000 to modify the reminder letter. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced reminder increases overall uptake and reduces the socioeconomic gradient in bowel cancer screening participation at little additional cost. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-06 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5155361/ /pubmed/27875518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Raine, Rosalind Moss, Sue M von Wagner, Christian Atkin, Wendy Hans, Ines Kralj Howe, Rosemary Solmi, Francesca Morris, Stephen Counsell, Nicholas Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Snowball, Julia Seaman, Helen Thomas, Mary Smith, Samuel G McGregor, Lesley M Vart, Gemma Wardle, Jane Duffy, Stephen W A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title | A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title_full | A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title_fullStr | A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title_short | A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
title_sort | national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rainerosalind anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT mosssuem anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT vonwagnerchristian anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT atkinwendy anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT hansineskralj anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT howerosemary anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT solmifrancesca anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT morrisstephen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT counsellnicholas anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT hackshawallan anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT halloranstephen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT handleygraham anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT loganrichardf anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT rainbowsandra anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT smithsteve anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT snowballjulia anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT seamanhelen anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT thomasmary anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT smithsamuelg anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT mcgregorlesleym anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT vartgemma anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT wardlejane anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT duffystephenw anationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT rainerosalind nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT mosssuem nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT vonwagnerchristian nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT atkinwendy nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT hansineskralj nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT howerosemary nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT solmifrancesca nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT morrisstephen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT counsellnicholas nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT hackshawallan nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT halloranstephen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT handleygraham nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT loganrichardf nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT rainbowsandra nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT smithsteve nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT snowballjulia nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT seamanhelen nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT thomasmary nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT smithsamuelg nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT mcgregorlesleym nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT vartgemma nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT wardlejane nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening AT duffystephenw nationalclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheeffectofenhancedremindersonthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeinbowelcancerscreening |