Cargando…
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
BACKGROUND: The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative promotes the development and application of core outcome sets (COS), including relevant studies in an online database. In order to keep the database current, an annual search of the literature is undertaken. This study...
Autores principales: | Gorst, Sarah L., Gargon, Elizabeth, Clarke, Mike, Smith, Valerie, Williamson, Paula R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27973622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168403 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
por: Davis, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)