Cargando…

Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy

PURPOSE: To compare 2-year clinical outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with bullous keratopathy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain 2 years of follow-up data of DSAEK or PK at a sin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung Eun, Lim, Sung A, Byun, Yong-Soo, Joo, Choun-Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980363
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.443
_version_ 1782481292768575488
author Kim, Sung Eun
Lim, Sung A
Byun, Yong-Soo
Joo, Choun-Ki
author_facet Kim, Sung Eun
Lim, Sung A
Byun, Yong-Soo
Joo, Choun-Ki
author_sort Kim, Sung Eun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare 2-year clinical outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with bullous keratopathy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain 2 years of follow-up data of DSAEK or PK at a single center from March 2009 to September 2012. The study comprised 15 eyes of DSAEK and 11 eyes of PK. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical and keratometric changes, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and postoperative complications. Graft survival rate was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics between the two groups. At postoperative 2 years, better BCVA of 0.69 ± 0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was found after DSAEK compared to 0.88 ± 0.48 logMAR after PK. Refractive cylinder in DSAEK and PK was −2.60 ± 1.53 and −6.00 ± 1.05 diopters (D), respectively, and keratometric cylinder was 3.27 ± 3.70 and 6.34 ± 3.51 D, respectively, at postoperative 2 years. The difference of mean spherical equivalents between postoperative 1 month and 2 years was 0.84 D after DSAEK and 2.05 D after PK. A hyperopic shift of 1.17 D was present after 2 years of DSAEK. The mean endothelial cell density at postoperative 2 years was 1,548 ± 456 cells/mm(2) for DSAEK and 1,052 ± 567 cells/mm(2) for PK, with a cell loss of 19.96% vs. 52.38%, respectively when compared to postoperative 1 month. No significant difference in central corneal thickness was found between DSAEK and PK (592 ± 75 vs. 563 ± 90 µm, respectively). Finally, the 2-year survival rate did not differ significantly between DSAEK and PK (93.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively, p = 0.344). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PK, DSAEK provided more stable refractive errors with better visual outcome, lower endothelial cell loss, and a lower rate of graft rejection at postoperative 2 years in patients with bullous keratopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5156618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51566182016-12-15 Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy Kim, Sung Eun Lim, Sung A Byun, Yong-Soo Joo, Choun-Ki Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare 2-year clinical outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with bullous keratopathy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain 2 years of follow-up data of DSAEK or PK at a single center from March 2009 to September 2012. The study comprised 15 eyes of DSAEK and 11 eyes of PK. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical and keratometric changes, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and postoperative complications. Graft survival rate was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics between the two groups. At postoperative 2 years, better BCVA of 0.69 ± 0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was found after DSAEK compared to 0.88 ± 0.48 logMAR after PK. Refractive cylinder in DSAEK and PK was −2.60 ± 1.53 and −6.00 ± 1.05 diopters (D), respectively, and keratometric cylinder was 3.27 ± 3.70 and 6.34 ± 3.51 D, respectively, at postoperative 2 years. The difference of mean spherical equivalents between postoperative 1 month and 2 years was 0.84 D after DSAEK and 2.05 D after PK. A hyperopic shift of 1.17 D was present after 2 years of DSAEK. The mean endothelial cell density at postoperative 2 years was 1,548 ± 456 cells/mm(2) for DSAEK and 1,052 ± 567 cells/mm(2) for PK, with a cell loss of 19.96% vs. 52.38%, respectively when compared to postoperative 1 month. No significant difference in central corneal thickness was found between DSAEK and PK (592 ± 75 vs. 563 ± 90 µm, respectively). Finally, the 2-year survival rate did not differ significantly between DSAEK and PK (93.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively, p = 0.344). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PK, DSAEK provided more stable refractive errors with better visual outcome, lower endothelial cell loss, and a lower rate of graft rejection at postoperative 2 years in patients with bullous keratopathy. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2016-12 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5156618/ /pubmed/27980363 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.443 Text en © 2016 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sung Eun
Lim, Sung A
Byun, Yong-Soo
Joo, Choun-Ki
Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title_full Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title_fullStr Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title_short Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
title_sort comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with bullous keratopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980363
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.443
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungeun comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesbetweendescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyandpenetratingkeratoplastyinpatientswithbullouskeratopathy
AT limsunga comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesbetweendescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyandpenetratingkeratoplastyinpatientswithbullouskeratopathy
AT byunyongsoo comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesbetweendescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyandpenetratingkeratoplastyinpatientswithbullouskeratopathy
AT joochounki comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomesbetweendescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyandpenetratingkeratoplastyinpatientswithbullouskeratopathy