Cargando…

Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moosavi, Sarvenaz, Enns, Robert, Gentile, Laura, Gondara, Lovedeep, McGahan, Colleen, Telford, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048
_version_ 1782481323172036608
author Moosavi, Sarvenaz
Enns, Robert
Gentile, Laura
Gondara, Lovedeep
McGahan, Colleen
Telford, Jennifer
author_facet Moosavi, Sarvenaz
Enns, Robert
Gentile, Laura
Gondara, Lovedeep
McGahan, Colleen
Telford, Jennifer
author_sort Moosavi, Sarvenaz
collection PubMed
description Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and FIT results. Participants completed both FITs and had one positive FIT and colonoscopy. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated using a weighted-generalized score statistic. A two-sided 5% significance level was used. Results. 1576 of 17,031 average-risk participants, 50–75 years old, had a positive FIT. Colonoscopy revealed 58 (3.7%) cancers, 419 (31.6%) high-risk polyps, and 374 (23.7%) low-risk polyps as the most significant lesion. PPV of one versus two positive FITs for cancer, high-risk polyps, and any neoplasia were 1% versus 8%, 20% versus 40%, and 48% versus 67%, respectively (p value < 0.0001). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 7 CRCs and 98 high-risk polyps. Conclusions. PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for CRC and high-risk polyps. The added value of the second FIT was 12% of total CRCs and 23% of total high-risk polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5156785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51567852017-01-02 Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Moosavi, Sarvenaz Enns, Robert Gentile, Laura Gondara, Lovedeep McGahan, Colleen Telford, Jennifer Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and FIT results. Participants completed both FITs and had one positive FIT and colonoscopy. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated using a weighted-generalized score statistic. A two-sided 5% significance level was used. Results. 1576 of 17,031 average-risk participants, 50–75 years old, had a positive FIT. Colonoscopy revealed 58 (3.7%) cancers, 419 (31.6%) high-risk polyps, and 374 (23.7%) low-risk polyps as the most significant lesion. PPV of one versus two positive FITs for cancer, high-risk polyps, and any neoplasia were 1% versus 8%, 20% versus 40%, and 48% versus 67%, respectively (p value < 0.0001). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 7 CRCs and 98 high-risk polyps. Conclusions. PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for CRC and high-risk polyps. The added value of the second FIT was 12% of total CRCs and 23% of total high-risk polyps. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5156785/ /pubmed/28044123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sarvenaz Moosavi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moosavi, Sarvenaz
Enns, Robert
Gentile, Laura
Gondara, Lovedeep
McGahan, Colleen
Telford, Jennifer
Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title_full Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title_fullStr Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title_short Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
title_sort comparison of one versus two fecal immunochemical tests in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048
work_keys_str_mv AT moosavisarvenaz comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT ennsrobert comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT gentilelaura comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT gondaralovedeep comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT mcgahancolleen comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT telfordjennifer comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram