Cargando…
Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048 |
_version_ | 1782481323172036608 |
---|---|
author | Moosavi, Sarvenaz Enns, Robert Gentile, Laura Gondara, Lovedeep McGahan, Colleen Telford, Jennifer |
author_facet | Moosavi, Sarvenaz Enns, Robert Gentile, Laura Gondara, Lovedeep McGahan, Colleen Telford, Jennifer |
author_sort | Moosavi, Sarvenaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and FIT results. Participants completed both FITs and had one positive FIT and colonoscopy. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated using a weighted-generalized score statistic. A two-sided 5% significance level was used. Results. 1576 of 17,031 average-risk participants, 50–75 years old, had a positive FIT. Colonoscopy revealed 58 (3.7%) cancers, 419 (31.6%) high-risk polyps, and 374 (23.7%) low-risk polyps as the most significant lesion. PPV of one versus two positive FITs for cancer, high-risk polyps, and any neoplasia were 1% versus 8%, 20% versus 40%, and 48% versus 67%, respectively (p value < 0.0001). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 7 CRCs and 98 high-risk polyps. Conclusions. PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for CRC and high-risk polyps. The added value of the second FIT was 12% of total CRCs and 23% of total high-risk polyps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5156785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51567852017-01-02 Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Moosavi, Sarvenaz Enns, Robert Gentile, Laura Gondara, Lovedeep McGahan, Colleen Telford, Jennifer Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and FIT results. Participants completed both FITs and had one positive FIT and colonoscopy. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated using a weighted-generalized score statistic. A two-sided 5% significance level was used. Results. 1576 of 17,031 average-risk participants, 50–75 years old, had a positive FIT. Colonoscopy revealed 58 (3.7%) cancers, 419 (31.6%) high-risk polyps, and 374 (23.7%) low-risk polyps as the most significant lesion. PPV of one versus two positive FITs for cancer, high-risk polyps, and any neoplasia were 1% versus 8%, 20% versus 40%, and 48% versus 67%, respectively (p value < 0.0001). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 7 CRCs and 98 high-risk polyps. Conclusions. PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for CRC and high-risk polyps. The added value of the second FIT was 12% of total CRCs and 23% of total high-risk polyps. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5156785/ /pubmed/28044123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sarvenaz Moosavi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moosavi, Sarvenaz Enns, Robert Gentile, Laura Gondara, Lovedeep McGahan, Colleen Telford, Jennifer Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title | Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title_full | Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title_fullStr | Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title_short | Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program |
title_sort | comparison of one versus two fecal immunochemical tests in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5914048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moosavisarvenaz comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram AT ennsrobert comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram AT gentilelaura comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram AT gondaralovedeep comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram AT mcgahancolleen comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram AT telfordjennifer comparisonofoneversustwofecalimmunochemicaltestsinthedetectionofcolorectalneoplasiainapopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram |