Cargando…
Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation
A random effects meta‐analysis combines the results of several independent studies to summarise the evidence about a particular measure of interest, such as a treatment effect. The approach allows for unexplained between‐study heterogeneity in the true treatment effect by incorporating random study...
Autores principales: | Partlett, Christopher, Riley, Richard D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27714841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7140 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evolution of Heterogeneity (I(2)) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses
por: Thorlund, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Copula miss-specification in REML multivariate genetic animal model estimation
por: Rohmer, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Coverage and the Interpretation of Classical Confidence Intervals
por: James, Frederick E
Publicado: (2005) -
Vaccine trials with no serious adverse reactions – estimation of upper 95% confidence intervals for likelihood of such events
por: Grech, Victor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Estimating the 95% confidence interval for survival gain between an experimental anti-cancer treatment and a control
por: Messori, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2017)