Cargando…

Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carey, Mariko, Sanson‐Fisher, Robert, Macrae, Finlay, Cameron, Emilie, Hill, David, D'Este, Catherine, Simmons, Jody, Doran, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579
_version_ 1782481511723827200
author Carey, Mariko
Sanson‐Fisher, Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Cameron, Emilie
Hill, David
D'Este, Catherine
Simmons, Jody
Doran, Christopher
author_facet Carey, Mariko
Sanson‐Fisher, Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Cameron, Emilie
Hill, David
D'Este, Catherine
Simmons, Jody
Doran, Christopher
author_sort Carey, Mariko
collection PubMed
description Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and randomly allocated as a family unit to the intervention or control condition. The control group received general information about CRC screening. The intervention group received printed advice regarding screening that was targeted to their risk level. Screening adherence was assessed at baseline and at 12 months via self report. Results: 752 (25%) index cases and 574 (34%) eligible first degree relatives consented to take part in the trial and completed baseline interviews. At 12 months, 58% of first degree relatives in the control group and 61% in the intervention group were adherent to screening guidelines (mixed effects logistic regression group by time interaction effect =2.7; 95%CI=1.2–5.9; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention was only effective for those with the lowest risk. Conclusions: Provision of personalised risk information may have a modest effect on adherence to CRC screening recommendations among first degree relatives of people diagnosed with CRC. Implications : Improved strategies for identifying and engaging first degree relatives are needed to maximise the population impact of the intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5157779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51577792016-12-30 Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial Carey, Mariko Sanson‐Fisher, Robert Macrae, Finlay Cameron, Emilie Hill, David D'Este, Catherine Simmons, Jody Doran, Christopher Aust N Z J Public Health Screening Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and randomly allocated as a family unit to the intervention or control condition. The control group received general information about CRC screening. The intervention group received printed advice regarding screening that was targeted to their risk level. Screening adherence was assessed at baseline and at 12 months via self report. Results: 752 (25%) index cases and 574 (34%) eligible first degree relatives consented to take part in the trial and completed baseline interviews. At 12 months, 58% of first degree relatives in the control group and 61% in the intervention group were adherent to screening guidelines (mixed effects logistic regression group by time interaction effect =2.7; 95%CI=1.2–5.9; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention was only effective for those with the lowest risk. Conclusions: Provision of personalised risk information may have a modest effect on adherence to CRC screening recommendations among first degree relatives of people diagnosed with CRC. Implications : Improved strategies for identifying and engaging first degree relatives are needed to maximise the population impact of the intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-13 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5157779/ /pubmed/27625308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579 Text en © 2016 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Screening
Carey, Mariko
Sanson‐Fisher, Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Cameron, Emilie
Hill, David
D'Este, Catherine
Simmons, Jody
Doran, Christopher
Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title_full Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title_short Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
title_sort can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? a randomised controlled trial
topic Screening
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579
work_keys_str_mv AT careymariko canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sansonfisherrobert canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macraefinlay canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cameronemilie canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hilldavid canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT destecatherine canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simmonsjody canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT doranchristopher canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial