Cargando…
Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial
Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579 |
_version_ | 1782481511723827200 |
---|---|
author | Carey, Mariko Sanson‐Fisher, Robert Macrae, Finlay Cameron, Emilie Hill, David D'Este, Catherine Simmons, Jody Doran, Christopher |
author_facet | Carey, Mariko Sanson‐Fisher, Robert Macrae, Finlay Cameron, Emilie Hill, David D'Este, Catherine Simmons, Jody Doran, Christopher |
author_sort | Carey, Mariko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and randomly allocated as a family unit to the intervention or control condition. The control group received general information about CRC screening. The intervention group received printed advice regarding screening that was targeted to their risk level. Screening adherence was assessed at baseline and at 12 months via self report. Results: 752 (25%) index cases and 574 (34%) eligible first degree relatives consented to take part in the trial and completed baseline interviews. At 12 months, 58% of first degree relatives in the control group and 61% in the intervention group were adherent to screening guidelines (mixed effects logistic regression group by time interaction effect =2.7; 95%CI=1.2–5.9; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention was only effective for those with the lowest risk. Conclusions: Provision of personalised risk information may have a modest effect on adherence to CRC screening recommendations among first degree relatives of people diagnosed with CRC. Implications : Improved strategies for identifying and engaging first degree relatives are needed to maximise the population impact of the intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5157779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51577792016-12-30 Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial Carey, Mariko Sanson‐Fisher, Robert Macrae, Finlay Cameron, Emilie Hill, David D'Este, Catherine Simmons, Jody Doran, Christopher Aust N Z J Public Health Screening Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and randomly allocated as a family unit to the intervention or control condition. The control group received general information about CRC screening. The intervention group received printed advice regarding screening that was targeted to their risk level. Screening adherence was assessed at baseline and at 12 months via self report. Results: 752 (25%) index cases and 574 (34%) eligible first degree relatives consented to take part in the trial and completed baseline interviews. At 12 months, 58% of first degree relatives in the control group and 61% in the intervention group were adherent to screening guidelines (mixed effects logistic regression group by time interaction effect =2.7; 95%CI=1.2–5.9; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention was only effective for those with the lowest risk. Conclusions: Provision of personalised risk information may have a modest effect on adherence to CRC screening recommendations among first degree relatives of people diagnosed with CRC. Implications : Improved strategies for identifying and engaging first degree relatives are needed to maximise the population impact of the intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-13 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5157779/ /pubmed/27625308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579 Text en © 2016 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Screening Carey, Mariko Sanson‐Fisher, Robert Macrae, Finlay Cameron, Emilie Hill, David D'Este, Catherine Simmons, Jody Doran, Christopher Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title | Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | can a print‐based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Screening |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT careymariko canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sansonfisherrobert canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macraefinlay canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cameronemilie canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hilldavid canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT destecatherine canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT simmonsjody canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT doranchristopher canaprintbasedinterventionincreasescreeningforfirstdegreerelativesofpeoplewithcolorectalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial |