Cargando…

Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology

Common leaf spot (caused by Pseudopeziza medicaginis), rust (caused by Uromyces striatus), Leptosphaerulina leaf spot (caused by Leptosphaerulina briosiana) and Cercospora leaf spot (caused by Cercospora medicaginis) are the four common types of alfalfa leaf diseases. Timely and accurate diagnoses o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Feng, Liu, Dongxia, Sun, Bingda, Ruan, Liu, Ma, Zhanhong, Wang, Haiguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27977767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168274
_version_ 1782481550932180992
author Qin, Feng
Liu, Dongxia
Sun, Bingda
Ruan, Liu
Ma, Zhanhong
Wang, Haiguang
author_facet Qin, Feng
Liu, Dongxia
Sun, Bingda
Ruan, Liu
Ma, Zhanhong
Wang, Haiguang
author_sort Qin, Feng
collection PubMed
description Common leaf spot (caused by Pseudopeziza medicaginis), rust (caused by Uromyces striatus), Leptosphaerulina leaf spot (caused by Leptosphaerulina briosiana) and Cercospora leaf spot (caused by Cercospora medicaginis) are the four common types of alfalfa leaf diseases. Timely and accurate diagnoses of these diseases are critical for disease management, alfalfa quality control and the healthy development of the alfalfa industry. In this study, the identification and diagnosis of the four types of alfalfa leaf diseases were investigated using pattern recognition algorithms based on image-processing technology. A sub-image with one or multiple typical lesions was obtained by artificial cutting from each acquired digital disease image. Then the sub-images were segmented using twelve lesion segmentation methods integrated with clustering algorithms (including K_means clustering, fuzzy C-means clustering and K_median clustering) and supervised classification algorithms (including logistic regression analysis, Naive Bayes algorithm, classification and regression tree, and linear discriminant analysis). After a comprehensive comparison, the segmentation method integrating the K_median clustering algorithm and linear discriminant analysis was chosen to obtain lesion images. After the lesion segmentation using this method, a total of 129 texture, color and shape features were extracted from the lesion images. Based on the features selected using three methods (ReliefF, 1R and correlation-based feature selection), disease recognition models were built using three supervised learning methods, including the random forest, support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbor methods. A comparison of the recognition results of the models was conducted. The results showed that when the ReliefF method was used for feature selection, the SVM model built with the most important 45 features (selected from a total of 129 features) was the optimal model. For this SVM model, the recognition accuracies of the training set and the testing set were 97.64% and 94.74%, respectively. Semi-supervised models for disease recognition were built based on the 45 effective features that were used for building the optimal SVM model. For the optimal semi-supervised models built with three ratios of labeled to unlabeled samples in the training set, the recognition accuracies of the training set and the testing set were both approximately 80%. The results indicated that image recognition of the four alfalfa leaf diseases can be implemented with high accuracy. This study provides a feasible solution for lesion image segmentation and image recognition of alfalfa leaf disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5158033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51580332016-12-21 Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology Qin, Feng Liu, Dongxia Sun, Bingda Ruan, Liu Ma, Zhanhong Wang, Haiguang PLoS One Research Article Common leaf spot (caused by Pseudopeziza medicaginis), rust (caused by Uromyces striatus), Leptosphaerulina leaf spot (caused by Leptosphaerulina briosiana) and Cercospora leaf spot (caused by Cercospora medicaginis) are the four common types of alfalfa leaf diseases. Timely and accurate diagnoses of these diseases are critical for disease management, alfalfa quality control and the healthy development of the alfalfa industry. In this study, the identification and diagnosis of the four types of alfalfa leaf diseases were investigated using pattern recognition algorithms based on image-processing technology. A sub-image with one or multiple typical lesions was obtained by artificial cutting from each acquired digital disease image. Then the sub-images were segmented using twelve lesion segmentation methods integrated with clustering algorithms (including K_means clustering, fuzzy C-means clustering and K_median clustering) and supervised classification algorithms (including logistic regression analysis, Naive Bayes algorithm, classification and regression tree, and linear discriminant analysis). After a comprehensive comparison, the segmentation method integrating the K_median clustering algorithm and linear discriminant analysis was chosen to obtain lesion images. After the lesion segmentation using this method, a total of 129 texture, color and shape features were extracted from the lesion images. Based on the features selected using three methods (ReliefF, 1R and correlation-based feature selection), disease recognition models were built using three supervised learning methods, including the random forest, support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbor methods. A comparison of the recognition results of the models was conducted. The results showed that when the ReliefF method was used for feature selection, the SVM model built with the most important 45 features (selected from a total of 129 features) was the optimal model. For this SVM model, the recognition accuracies of the training set and the testing set were 97.64% and 94.74%, respectively. Semi-supervised models for disease recognition were built based on the 45 effective features that were used for building the optimal SVM model. For the optimal semi-supervised models built with three ratios of labeled to unlabeled samples in the training set, the recognition accuracies of the training set and the testing set were both approximately 80%. The results indicated that image recognition of the four alfalfa leaf diseases can be implemented with high accuracy. This study provides a feasible solution for lesion image segmentation and image recognition of alfalfa leaf disease. Public Library of Science 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5158033/ /pubmed/27977767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168274 Text en © 2016 Qin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qin, Feng
Liu, Dongxia
Sun, Bingda
Ruan, Liu
Ma, Zhanhong
Wang, Haiguang
Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title_full Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title_fullStr Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title_short Identification of Alfalfa Leaf Diseases Using Image Recognition Technology
title_sort identification of alfalfa leaf diseases using image recognition technology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27977767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168274
work_keys_str_mv AT qinfeng identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology
AT liudongxia identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology
AT sunbingda identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology
AT ruanliu identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology
AT mazhanhong identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology
AT wanghaiguang identificationofalfalfaleafdiseasesusingimagerecognitiontechnology