Cargando…
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203 |
_version_ | 1782481574709690368 |
---|---|
author | Andreanos, Konstantinos Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Diagourtas, Andreas Kotoulas, Andreas Dimitrakas, Panagiotis Moschos, Marilita M |
author_facet | Andreanos, Konstantinos Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Diagourtas, Andreas Kotoulas, Andreas Dimitrakas, Panagiotis Moschos, Marilita M |
author_sort | Andreanos, Konstantinos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, attending outpatient ophthalmology appointments, who underwent intraocular pressure measurements by GAT and Pascal DCT. CCT and corneal curvature were obtained using ultrasound pachymetry and Orbscan topography, respectively. All measurements were carried out among males and females during the period 2009–2012. Apart from the usual descriptive and exploratory data analysis, one-way analysis of variance and agreement analysis were performed, linear as well as intraclass correlation coefficients were estimated, and multiple scatter and Bland–Altman plots were produced. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements obtained were 17.21±4.10 mmHg by DCT and 13.23±4.07 mmHg by GAT. Mean difference between the GAT and DCT measurements was 3.88±2.8 mmHg. Mean CCT and corneal curvature were 522.78±52 μm and 43.83±2.9823 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure measured by GAT was consistently lower when compared with DCT, and this difference was greatest with thinner CCT. Flat corneas seem to influence GAT measurements compared to DCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5158174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51581742016-12-21 Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature Andreanos, Konstantinos Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Diagourtas, Andreas Kotoulas, Andreas Dimitrakas, Panagiotis Moschos, Marilita M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, attending outpatient ophthalmology appointments, who underwent intraocular pressure measurements by GAT and Pascal DCT. CCT and corneal curvature were obtained using ultrasound pachymetry and Orbscan topography, respectively. All measurements were carried out among males and females during the period 2009–2012. Apart from the usual descriptive and exploratory data analysis, one-way analysis of variance and agreement analysis were performed, linear as well as intraclass correlation coefficients were estimated, and multiple scatter and Bland–Altman plots were produced. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements obtained were 17.21±4.10 mmHg by DCT and 13.23±4.07 mmHg by GAT. Mean difference between the GAT and DCT measurements was 3.88±2.8 mmHg. Mean CCT and corneal curvature were 522.78±52 μm and 43.83±2.9823 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure measured by GAT was consistently lower when compared with DCT, and this difference was greatest with thinner CCT. Flat corneas seem to influence GAT measurements compared to DCT. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5158174/ /pubmed/28003737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203 Text en © 2016 Andreanos et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Andreanos, Konstantinos Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Diagourtas, Andreas Kotoulas, Andreas Dimitrakas, Panagiotis Moschos, Marilita M Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title | Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title_full | Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title_short | Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
title_sort | comparison of goldmann applanation tonometry and pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreanoskonstantinos comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT koutsandreachryssanthi comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT papaconstantinoudimitris comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT diagourtasandreas comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT kotoulasandreas comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT dimitrakaspanagiotis comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature AT moschosmarilitam comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature |