Cargando…

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreanos, Konstantinos, Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi, Papaconstantinou, Dimitris, Diagourtas, Andreas, Kotoulas, Andreas, Dimitrakas, Panagiotis, Moschos, Marilita M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003737
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203
_version_ 1782481574709690368
author Andreanos, Konstantinos
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Diagourtas, Andreas
Kotoulas, Andreas
Dimitrakas, Panagiotis
Moschos, Marilita M
author_facet Andreanos, Konstantinos
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Diagourtas, Andreas
Kotoulas, Andreas
Dimitrakas, Panagiotis
Moschos, Marilita M
author_sort Andreanos, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, attending outpatient ophthalmology appointments, who underwent intraocular pressure measurements by GAT and Pascal DCT. CCT and corneal curvature were obtained using ultrasound pachymetry and Orbscan topography, respectively. All measurements were carried out among males and females during the period 2009–2012. Apart from the usual descriptive and exploratory data analysis, one-way analysis of variance and agreement analysis were performed, linear as well as intraclass correlation coefficients were estimated, and multiple scatter and Bland–Altman plots were produced. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements obtained were 17.21±4.10 mmHg by DCT and 13.23±4.07 mmHg by GAT. Mean difference between the GAT and DCT measurements was 3.88±2.8 mmHg. Mean CCT and corneal curvature were 522.78±52 μm and 43.83±2.9823 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure measured by GAT was consistently lower when compared with DCT, and this difference was greatest with thinner CCT. Flat corneas seem to influence GAT measurements compared to DCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5158174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51581742016-12-21 Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature Andreanos, Konstantinos Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Diagourtas, Andreas Kotoulas, Andreas Dimitrakas, Panagiotis Moschos, Marilita M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature in tonometry measurements taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 185 eyes from 97 subjects, attending outpatient ophthalmology appointments, who underwent intraocular pressure measurements by GAT and Pascal DCT. CCT and corneal curvature were obtained using ultrasound pachymetry and Orbscan topography, respectively. All measurements were carried out among males and females during the period 2009–2012. Apart from the usual descriptive and exploratory data analysis, one-way analysis of variance and agreement analysis were performed, linear as well as intraclass correlation coefficients were estimated, and multiple scatter and Bland–Altman plots were produced. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements obtained were 17.21±4.10 mmHg by DCT and 13.23±4.07 mmHg by GAT. Mean difference between the GAT and DCT measurements was 3.88±2.8 mmHg. Mean CCT and corneal curvature were 522.78±52 μm and 43.83±2.9823 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure measured by GAT was consistently lower when compared with DCT, and this difference was greatest with thinner CCT. Flat corneas seem to influence GAT measurements compared to DCT. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5158174/ /pubmed/28003737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203 Text en © 2016 Andreanos et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Andreanos, Konstantinos
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Diagourtas, Andreas
Kotoulas, Andreas
Dimitrakas, Panagiotis
Moschos, Marilita M
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title_full Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title_fullStr Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title_short Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
title_sort comparison of goldmann applanation tonometry and pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003737
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203
work_keys_str_mv AT andreanoskonstantinos comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT koutsandreachryssanthi comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT papaconstantinoudimitris comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT diagourtasandreas comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT kotoulasandreas comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT dimitrakaspanagiotis comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature
AT moschosmarilitam comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometryandpascaldynamiccontourtonometryinrelationtocentralcornealthicknessandcornealcurvature