Cargando…

An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships

Matching a person who is blind or visually impaired with a guide dog is a process of finding the most suitable guide dog available for that individual. Not all guide dog partnerships are successful, and the consequences of an unsuccessful partnership may result in reduced mobility and quality of lif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd, Janice, Budge, Claire, La Grow, Steve, Stafford, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00114
_version_ 1782481779169427456
author Lloyd, Janice
Budge, Claire
La Grow, Steve
Stafford, Kevin
author_facet Lloyd, Janice
Budge, Claire
La Grow, Steve
Stafford, Kevin
author_sort Lloyd, Janice
collection PubMed
description Matching a person who is blind or visually impaired with a guide dog is a process of finding the most suitable guide dog available for that individual. Not all guide dog partnerships are successful, and the consequences of an unsuccessful partnership may result in reduced mobility and quality of life for the handler (owner), and are costly in time and resources for guide dog training establishments. This study examined 50 peoples’ partnerships with one or more dogs (118 pairings) to ascertain the outcome of the relationship. Forty-three of the 118 dogs were returned to the guide dog training establishment before reaching retirement age, with the majority (n = 40) being categorized as having dog-related issues. Most (n = 26) of these dogs’ issues were classified as being behavioral in character, including work-related and non-work-related behavior, and 14 were due to physical causes (mainly poor health). Three dogs were returned due to matters relating to the handlers’ behavior. More second dogs were returned than the handlers’ first or third dogs, and dogs that had been previously used as a guide could be rematched successfully. Defining matching success is not clear-cut. Not all dogs that were returned were considered by their handlers to have been mismatched, and not all dogs retained until retirement were thought to have been good matches, suggesting that some handlers were retaining what they considered to be a poorly matched dog. Almost all the handlers who regarded a dog as being mismatched conceded that some aspects of the match were good. For example, a dog deemed mismatched for poor working behavior may have shown good home and/or other social behaviors. The same principle was true for successful matches, where few handlers claimed to have had a perfect dog. It is hoped that these results may help the guide dog industry identify important aspects of the matching process, and/or be used to identify areas where a matching problem exists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5159482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51594822016-12-23 An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships Lloyd, Janice Budge, Claire La Grow, Steve Stafford, Kevin Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Matching a person who is blind or visually impaired with a guide dog is a process of finding the most suitable guide dog available for that individual. Not all guide dog partnerships are successful, and the consequences of an unsuccessful partnership may result in reduced mobility and quality of life for the handler (owner), and are costly in time and resources for guide dog training establishments. This study examined 50 peoples’ partnerships with one or more dogs (118 pairings) to ascertain the outcome of the relationship. Forty-three of the 118 dogs were returned to the guide dog training establishment before reaching retirement age, with the majority (n = 40) being categorized as having dog-related issues. Most (n = 26) of these dogs’ issues were classified as being behavioral in character, including work-related and non-work-related behavior, and 14 were due to physical causes (mainly poor health). Three dogs were returned due to matters relating to the handlers’ behavior. More second dogs were returned than the handlers’ first or third dogs, and dogs that had been previously used as a guide could be rematched successfully. Defining matching success is not clear-cut. Not all dogs that were returned were considered by their handlers to have been mismatched, and not all dogs retained until retirement were thought to have been good matches, suggesting that some handlers were retaining what they considered to be a poorly matched dog. Almost all the handlers who regarded a dog as being mismatched conceded that some aspects of the match were good. For example, a dog deemed mismatched for poor working behavior may have shown good home and/or other social behaviors. The same principle was true for successful matches, where few handlers claimed to have had a perfect dog. It is hoped that these results may help the guide dog industry identify important aspects of the matching process, and/or be used to identify areas where a matching problem exists. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5159482/ /pubmed/28018910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00114 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lloyd, Budge, La Grow and Stafford. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Lloyd, Janice
Budge, Claire
La Grow, Steve
Stafford, Kevin
An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title_full An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title_fullStr An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title_short An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships
title_sort investigation of the complexities of successful and unsuccessful guide dog matching and partnerships
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00114
work_keys_str_mv AT lloydjanice aninvestigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT budgeclaire aninvestigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT lagrowsteve aninvestigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT staffordkevin aninvestigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT lloydjanice investigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT budgeclaire investigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT lagrowsteve investigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships
AT staffordkevin investigationofthecomplexitiesofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulguidedogmatchingandpartnerships