Cargando…
Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
AIM: To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00065 |
_version_ | 1782481779859390464 |
---|---|
author | Moris, Lisa Van den Broeck, Thomas Tosco, Lorenzo Van Baelen, Anthony Gontero, Paolo Karnes, Robert Jeffrey Everaerts, Wouter Albersen, Maarten Bastian, Patrick J. Chlosta, Piotr Claessens, Frank Chun, Felix K. Graefen, Markus Gratzke, Christian Kneitz, Burkhard Marchioro, Giansilvio Salas, Rafael Sanchez Tombal, Bertrand Van Der Poel, Henk Walz, Jochen Christoph De Meerleer, Gert Bossi, Alberto Haustermans, Karin Montorsi, Francesco Van Poppel, Hendrik Spahn, Martin Briganti, Alberto Joniau, Steven |
author_facet | Moris, Lisa Van den Broeck, Thomas Tosco, Lorenzo Van Baelen, Anthony Gontero, Paolo Karnes, Robert Jeffrey Everaerts, Wouter Albersen, Maarten Bastian, Patrick J. Chlosta, Piotr Claessens, Frank Chun, Felix K. Graefen, Markus Gratzke, Christian Kneitz, Burkhard Marchioro, Giansilvio Salas, Rafael Sanchez Tombal, Bertrand Van Der Poel, Henk Walz, Jochen Christoph De Meerleer, Gert Bossi, Alberto Haustermans, Karin Montorsi, Francesco Van Poppel, Hendrik Spahn, Martin Briganti, Alberto Joniau, Steven |
author_sort | Moris, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 1989 and 2011 at eight different tertiary institutions. We fitted univariate and multivariate Cox models to assess independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The number of positive lymph node (LN) was dichotomized according to the most informative cutoff predicting CSS. Kaplan–Meier curves assessed CSS and OS rates. Only patients with at least 10 LNs removed at PLND were included. This cutoff was chosen as a surrogate for a well performed PNLD. RESULTS: Mean age was 65 years (median: 66, IQR 60–70). Positive surgical margins were present in 53.7% (n = 671). Final Gleason score (GS) was 2–6 in 12.7% (n = 158), 7 in 52% (n = 649), and 8–10 in 35.4% (n = 442). The median number of LNs removed during PLND was 15 (IQR 12–17). Of all patients, 1,128 (90.3%) had 0–3 positive LNs, while 126 (9.7%) had ≥4 positive LNs. Patients with 0–3 positive LNs had significantly better CSS outcome at 10-year follow-up compared to patients with ≥4 positive LNs (87 vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for OS, with a 72 vs. 37% (p < 0.0001) survival at 10 years for patients with 0–3 vs. ≥4 positive LNs, respectively. At multivariate analysis, final GS of 8–10, salvage ADT therapy, and ≥4 (vs. <4) positive LNs were predictors of worse CSS and OS. Pathological stage pT4 was an additional predictor of worse CSS. CONCLUSION: Four or more positive LNs, pathological stage pT4, and final GS of 8–10 represent independent predictors for worse CSS in patients with high-risk PCa. Primary tumor biology remains a strong driver of tumor progression and patients having ≥4 positive LNs could be considered an enriched patient group in which novel treatment strategies should be studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5159485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51594852016-12-23 Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Moris, Lisa Van den Broeck, Thomas Tosco, Lorenzo Van Baelen, Anthony Gontero, Paolo Karnes, Robert Jeffrey Everaerts, Wouter Albersen, Maarten Bastian, Patrick J. Chlosta, Piotr Claessens, Frank Chun, Felix K. Graefen, Markus Gratzke, Christian Kneitz, Burkhard Marchioro, Giansilvio Salas, Rafael Sanchez Tombal, Bertrand Van Der Poel, Henk Walz, Jochen Christoph De Meerleer, Gert Bossi, Alberto Haustermans, Karin Montorsi, Francesco Van Poppel, Hendrik Spahn, Martin Briganti, Alberto Joniau, Steven Front Surg Surgery AIM: To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 1989 and 2011 at eight different tertiary institutions. We fitted univariate and multivariate Cox models to assess independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The number of positive lymph node (LN) was dichotomized according to the most informative cutoff predicting CSS. Kaplan–Meier curves assessed CSS and OS rates. Only patients with at least 10 LNs removed at PLND were included. This cutoff was chosen as a surrogate for a well performed PNLD. RESULTS: Mean age was 65 years (median: 66, IQR 60–70). Positive surgical margins were present in 53.7% (n = 671). Final Gleason score (GS) was 2–6 in 12.7% (n = 158), 7 in 52% (n = 649), and 8–10 in 35.4% (n = 442). The median number of LNs removed during PLND was 15 (IQR 12–17). Of all patients, 1,128 (90.3%) had 0–3 positive LNs, while 126 (9.7%) had ≥4 positive LNs. Patients with 0–3 positive LNs had significantly better CSS outcome at 10-year follow-up compared to patients with ≥4 positive LNs (87 vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for OS, with a 72 vs. 37% (p < 0.0001) survival at 10 years for patients with 0–3 vs. ≥4 positive LNs, respectively. At multivariate analysis, final GS of 8–10, salvage ADT therapy, and ≥4 (vs. <4) positive LNs were predictors of worse CSS and OS. Pathological stage pT4 was an additional predictor of worse CSS. CONCLUSION: Four or more positive LNs, pathological stage pT4, and final GS of 8–10 represent independent predictors for worse CSS in patients with high-risk PCa. Primary tumor biology remains a strong driver of tumor progression and patients having ≥4 positive LNs could be considered an enriched patient group in which novel treatment strategies should be studied. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5159485/ /pubmed/28018903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00065 Text en Copyright © 2016 Moris, Van den Broeck, Tosco, Van Baelen, Gontero, Karnes, Everaerts, Albersen, Bastian, Chlosta, Claessens, Chun, Graefen, Gratzke, Kneitz, Marchioro, Salas, Tombal, Van Der Poel, Walz, De Meerleer, Bossi, Haustermans, Montorsi, Van Poppel, Spahn, Briganti and Joniau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Moris, Lisa Van den Broeck, Thomas Tosco, Lorenzo Van Baelen, Anthony Gontero, Paolo Karnes, Robert Jeffrey Everaerts, Wouter Albersen, Maarten Bastian, Patrick J. Chlosta, Piotr Claessens, Frank Chun, Felix K. Graefen, Markus Gratzke, Christian Kneitz, Burkhard Marchioro, Giansilvio Salas, Rafael Sanchez Tombal, Bertrand Van Der Poel, Henk Walz, Jochen Christoph De Meerleer, Gert Bossi, Alberto Haustermans, Karin Montorsi, Francesco Van Poppel, Hendrik Spahn, Martin Briganti, Alberto Joniau, Steven Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title | Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title_full | Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title_fullStr | Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title_short | Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
title_sort | impact of lymph node burden on survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morislisa impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT vandenbroeckthomas impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT toscolorenzo impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT vanbaelenanthony impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT gonteropaolo impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT karnesrobertjeffrey impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT everaertswouter impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT albersenmaarten impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT bastianpatrickj impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT chlostapiotr impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT claessensfrank impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT chunfelixk impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT graefenmarkus impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT gratzkechristian impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT kneitzburkhard impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT marchiorogiansilvio impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT salasrafaelsanchez impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT tombalbertrand impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT vanderpoelhenk impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT walzjochenchristoph impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT demeerleergert impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT bossialberto impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT haustermanskarin impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT montorsifrancesco impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT vanpoppelhendrik impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT spahnmartin impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT brigantialberto impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection AT joniausteven impactoflymphnodeburdenonsurvivalofhighriskprostatecancerpatientsfollowingradicalprostatectomyandpelviclymphnodedissection |