Cargando…
Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International AIDS Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978939 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212 |
_version_ | 1782481812712325120 |
---|---|
author | Ishikawa, Naoko Dalal, Shona Johnson, Cheryl Hogan, Daniel R Shimbo, Takuro Shaffer, Nathan Pendse, Razia N Lo, Ying-Ru Ghidinelli, Massimo N Baggaley, Rachel |
author_facet | Ishikawa, Naoko Dalal, Shona Johnson, Cheryl Hogan, Daniel R Shimbo, Takuro Shaffer, Nathan Pendse, Razia N Lo, Ying-Ru Ghidinelli, Massimo N Baggaley, Rachel |
author_sort | Ishikawa, Naoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-burden areas should be considered. This study aimed at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of universal and focused HIV testing approaches for pregnant women across high to very low HIV prevalence settings. METHODS: We conducted a modelling analysis on health and cost outcomes of HIV testing for pregnant women using four country-based case scenarios (Namibia, Kenya, Haiti and Viet Nam) to illustrate high, intermediate, low and very low HIV prevalence settings. We used subnational prevalence data to divide each country into high-, medium- and low-burden areas, and modelled different antenatal and testing coverage in each. RESULTS: When HIV testing services were only focused in high-burden areas within a country, mother-to-child transmission rates remained high ranging from 18 to 23%, resulting in a 25 to 69% increase in new paediatric HIV infections and increased future treatment costs for children. Universal HIV testing was found to be dominant (i.e. more QALYs gained with less cost) compared to focused approaches in the Namibia, Kenya and Haiti scenarios. The universal approach was also very cost-effective compared to focused approaches, with $ 125 per quality-adjusted life years gained in the Viet Nam-based scenario of very low HIV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis further supported the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Universal approach to antenatal HIV testing achieves the best health outcomes and is cost-saving or cost-effective in the long term across the range of HIV prevalence settings. It is further a prerequisite for quality maternal and child healthcare and for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5159683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International AIDS Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51596832016-12-16 Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings Ishikawa, Naoko Dalal, Shona Johnson, Cheryl Hogan, Daniel R Shimbo, Takuro Shaffer, Nathan Pendse, Razia N Lo, Ying-Ru Ghidinelli, Massimo N Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Research Article INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-burden areas should be considered. This study aimed at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of universal and focused HIV testing approaches for pregnant women across high to very low HIV prevalence settings. METHODS: We conducted a modelling analysis on health and cost outcomes of HIV testing for pregnant women using four country-based case scenarios (Namibia, Kenya, Haiti and Viet Nam) to illustrate high, intermediate, low and very low HIV prevalence settings. We used subnational prevalence data to divide each country into high-, medium- and low-burden areas, and modelled different antenatal and testing coverage in each. RESULTS: When HIV testing services were only focused in high-burden areas within a country, mother-to-child transmission rates remained high ranging from 18 to 23%, resulting in a 25 to 69% increase in new paediatric HIV infections and increased future treatment costs for children. Universal HIV testing was found to be dominant (i.e. more QALYs gained with less cost) compared to focused approaches in the Namibia, Kenya and Haiti scenarios. The universal approach was also very cost-effective compared to focused approaches, with $ 125 per quality-adjusted life years gained in the Viet Nam-based scenario of very low HIV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis further supported the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Universal approach to antenatal HIV testing achieves the best health outcomes and is cost-saving or cost-effective in the long term across the range of HIV prevalence settings. It is further a prerequisite for quality maternal and child healthcare and for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. International AIDS Society 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5159683/ /pubmed/27978939 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212 Text en © 2016 World Health Organization; licensee IAS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ishikawa, Naoko Dalal, Shona Johnson, Cheryl Hogan, Daniel R Shimbo, Takuro Shaffer, Nathan Pendse, Razia N Lo, Ying-Ru Ghidinelli, Massimo N Baggaley, Rachel Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title | Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title_full | Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title_fullStr | Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title_short | Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings |
title_sort | should hiv testing for all pregnant women continue? cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low hiv prevalence settings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978939 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishikawanaoko shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT dalalshona shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT johnsoncheryl shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT hogandanielr shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT shimbotakuro shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT shaffernathan shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT pendserazian shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT loyingru shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT ghidinellimassimon shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings AT baggaleyrachel shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings |