Cargando…

Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings

INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, Naoko, Dalal, Shona, Johnson, Cheryl, Hogan, Daniel R, Shimbo, Takuro, Shaffer, Nathan, Pendse, Razia N, Lo, Ying-Ru, Ghidinelli, Massimo N, Baggaley, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978939
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212
_version_ 1782481812712325120
author Ishikawa, Naoko
Dalal, Shona
Johnson, Cheryl
Hogan, Daniel R
Shimbo, Takuro
Shaffer, Nathan
Pendse, Razia N
Lo, Ying-Ru
Ghidinelli, Massimo N
Baggaley, Rachel
author_facet Ishikawa, Naoko
Dalal, Shona
Johnson, Cheryl
Hogan, Daniel R
Shimbo, Takuro
Shaffer, Nathan
Pendse, Razia N
Lo, Ying-Ru
Ghidinelli, Massimo N
Baggaley, Rachel
author_sort Ishikawa, Naoko
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-burden areas should be considered. This study aimed at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of universal and focused HIV testing approaches for pregnant women across high to very low HIV prevalence settings. METHODS: We conducted a modelling analysis on health and cost outcomes of HIV testing for pregnant women using four country-based case scenarios (Namibia, Kenya, Haiti and Viet Nam) to illustrate high, intermediate, low and very low HIV prevalence settings. We used subnational prevalence data to divide each country into high-, medium- and low-burden areas, and modelled different antenatal and testing coverage in each. RESULTS: When HIV testing services were only focused in high-burden areas within a country, mother-to-child transmission rates remained high ranging from 18 to 23%, resulting in a 25 to 69% increase in new paediatric HIV infections and increased future treatment costs for children. Universal HIV testing was found to be dominant (i.e. more QALYs gained with less cost) compared to focused approaches in the Namibia, Kenya and Haiti scenarios. The universal approach was also very cost-effective compared to focused approaches, with $ 125 per quality-adjusted life years gained in the Viet Nam-based scenario of very low HIV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis further supported the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Universal approach to antenatal HIV testing achieves the best health outcomes and is cost-saving or cost-effective in the long term across the range of HIV prevalence settings. It is further a prerequisite for quality maternal and child healthcare and for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5159683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51596832016-12-16 Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings Ishikawa, Naoko Dalal, Shona Johnson, Cheryl Hogan, Daniel R Shimbo, Takuro Shaffer, Nathan Pendse, Razia N Lo, Ying-Ru Ghidinelli, Massimo N Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Research Article INTRODUCTION: HIV testing is the entry point for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Decreasing external funding for the HIV response in some low- and middle-income countries has triggered the question of whether a focused approach to HIV testing targeting pregnant women in high-burden areas should be considered. This study aimed at determining and comparing the cost-effectiveness of universal and focused HIV testing approaches for pregnant women across high to very low HIV prevalence settings. METHODS: We conducted a modelling analysis on health and cost outcomes of HIV testing for pregnant women using four country-based case scenarios (Namibia, Kenya, Haiti and Viet Nam) to illustrate high, intermediate, low and very low HIV prevalence settings. We used subnational prevalence data to divide each country into high-, medium- and low-burden areas, and modelled different antenatal and testing coverage in each. RESULTS: When HIV testing services were only focused in high-burden areas within a country, mother-to-child transmission rates remained high ranging from 18 to 23%, resulting in a 25 to 69% increase in new paediatric HIV infections and increased future treatment costs for children. Universal HIV testing was found to be dominant (i.e. more QALYs gained with less cost) compared to focused approaches in the Namibia, Kenya and Haiti scenarios. The universal approach was also very cost-effective compared to focused approaches, with $ 125 per quality-adjusted life years gained in the Viet Nam-based scenario of very low HIV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis further supported the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Universal approach to antenatal HIV testing achieves the best health outcomes and is cost-saving or cost-effective in the long term across the range of HIV prevalence settings. It is further a prerequisite for quality maternal and child healthcare and for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. International AIDS Society 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5159683/ /pubmed/27978939 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212 Text en © 2016 World Health Organization; licensee IAS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ishikawa, Naoko
Dalal, Shona
Johnson, Cheryl
Hogan, Daniel R
Shimbo, Takuro
Shaffer, Nathan
Pendse, Razia N
Lo, Ying-Ru
Ghidinelli, Massimo N
Baggaley, Rachel
Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title_full Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title_fullStr Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title_full_unstemmed Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title_short Should HIV testing for all pregnant women continue? Cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low HIV prevalence settings
title_sort should hiv testing for all pregnant women continue? cost-effectiveness of universal antenatal testing compared to focused approaches across high to very low hiv prevalence settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978939
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21212
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawanaoko shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT dalalshona shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT johnsoncheryl shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT hogandanielr shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT shimbotakuro shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT shaffernathan shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT pendserazian shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT loyingru shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT ghidinellimassimon shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings
AT baggaleyrachel shouldhivtestingforallpregnantwomencontinuecosteffectivenessofuniversalantenataltestingcomparedtofocusedapproachesacrosshightoverylowhivprevalencesettings