Cargando…

Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Fast-track surgery (FTS), also known as enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multidisciplinary approach to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimise hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and reduce health care costs, all without compromising patient safety. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Ling, Shi, Yu, Zhang, GN
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3
_version_ 1782481854556798976
author Cui, Ling
Shi, Yu
Zhang, GN
author_facet Cui, Ling
Shi, Yu
Zhang, GN
author_sort Cui, Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fast-track surgery (FTS), also known as enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multidisciplinary approach to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimise hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and reduce health care costs, all without compromising patient safety. The advantages of FTS in abdominal surgery most likely extend to gynaecological surgery, but this is an assumption, as FTS in elective gynaecological surgery has not been well studied. No consensus guidelines have been developed for gynaecological oncological surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. To our knowledge, there are no published randomised controlled trials; however, some studies have shown that FTS in gynaecological oncological surgery leads to early hospital discharge with high levels of patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is whether FTS reduces the length of stay in hospital compared to traditional management. The secondary aim is whether FTS is associated with any increase in post-surgical complications compared to traditional management (for both open and laparoscopic surgery). METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will prospectively compare FTS and traditional management protocols. The primary endpoint is the length of post-operative hospitalisation (days, mean ± standard deviation), defined as the number of days between the date of discharge and the date of surgery. The secondary endpoints are complications in both groups (FTS versus traditional protocol) occurring during the first 3 months post-operatively including infection (wound infection, lung infection, intraperitoneal infection), post-operative nausea and vomiting, ileus, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative thrombosis, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry II score. DISCUSSION: The advantages of FTS most likely extend to gynaecology, although, to our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative length of hospitalisation after major gynaecological or gynaecological oncological surgery and to analyse patients’ post-operative complications. This trial may reveal whether FTS leads to early hospital discharge with few complications after gynaecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02687412. Approval Number: SCCHEC20160001. Date of registration: registered on 23 February 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5159978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51599782016-12-23 Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial Cui, Ling Shi, Yu Zhang, GN Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Fast-track surgery (FTS), also known as enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multidisciplinary approach to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimise hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and reduce health care costs, all without compromising patient safety. The advantages of FTS in abdominal surgery most likely extend to gynaecological surgery, but this is an assumption, as FTS in elective gynaecological surgery has not been well studied. No consensus guidelines have been developed for gynaecological oncological surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. To our knowledge, there are no published randomised controlled trials; however, some studies have shown that FTS in gynaecological oncological surgery leads to early hospital discharge with high levels of patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is whether FTS reduces the length of stay in hospital compared to traditional management. The secondary aim is whether FTS is associated with any increase in post-surgical complications compared to traditional management (for both open and laparoscopic surgery). METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will prospectively compare FTS and traditional management protocols. The primary endpoint is the length of post-operative hospitalisation (days, mean ± standard deviation), defined as the number of days between the date of discharge and the date of surgery. The secondary endpoints are complications in both groups (FTS versus traditional protocol) occurring during the first 3 months post-operatively including infection (wound infection, lung infection, intraperitoneal infection), post-operative nausea and vomiting, ileus, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative thrombosis, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry II score. DISCUSSION: The advantages of FTS most likely extend to gynaecology, although, to our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative length of hospitalisation after major gynaecological or gynaecological oncological surgery and to analyse patients’ post-operative complications. This trial may reveal whether FTS leads to early hospital discharge with few complications after gynaecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02687412. Approval Number: SCCHEC20160001. Date of registration: registered on 23 February 2016. BioMed Central 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5159978/ /pubmed/27978842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cui, Ling
Shi, Yu
Zhang, GN
Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_short Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_sort fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27978842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiling fasttracksurgeryaftergynaecologicaloncologicalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shiyu fasttracksurgeryaftergynaecologicaloncologicalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhanggn fasttracksurgeryaftergynaecologicaloncologicalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial