Cargando…

Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds

Imitative behaviors are widespread in humans, in particular whenever two persons communicate and interact. Several tokens of spoken languages (onomatopoeias, ideophones, and phonesthemes) also display different degrees of iconicity between the sound of a word and what it refers to. Thus, it probably...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemaitre, Guillaume, Houix, Olivier, Voisin, Frédéric, Misdariis, Nicolas, Susini, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168167
_version_ 1782482093212696576
author Lemaitre, Guillaume
Houix, Olivier
Voisin, Frédéric
Misdariis, Nicolas
Susini, Patrick
author_facet Lemaitre, Guillaume
Houix, Olivier
Voisin, Frédéric
Misdariis, Nicolas
Susini, Patrick
author_sort Lemaitre, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description Imitative behaviors are widespread in humans, in particular whenever two persons communicate and interact. Several tokens of spoken languages (onomatopoeias, ideophones, and phonesthemes) also display different degrees of iconicity between the sound of a word and what it refers to. Thus, it probably comes at no surprise that human speakers use a lot of imitative vocalizations and gestures when they communicate about sounds, as sounds are notably difficult to describe. What is more surprising is that vocal imitations of non-vocal everyday sounds (e.g. the sound of a car passing by) are in practice very effective: listeners identify sounds better with vocal imitations than with verbal descriptions, despite the fact that vocal imitations are inaccurate reproductions of a sound created by a particular mechanical system (e.g. a car driving by) through a different system (the voice apparatus). The present study investigated the semantic representations evoked by vocal imitations of sounds by experimentally quantifying how well listeners could match sounds to category labels. The experiment used three different types of sounds: recordings of easily identifiable sounds (sounds of human actions and manufactured products), human vocal imitations, and computational “auditory sketches” (created by algorithmic computations). The results show that performance with the best vocal imitations was similar to the best auditory sketches for most categories of sounds, and even to the referent sounds themselves in some cases. More detailed analyses showed that the acoustic distance between a vocal imitation and a referent sound is not sufficient to account for such performance. Analyses suggested that instead of trying to reproduce the referent sound as accurately as vocally possible, vocal imitations focus on a few important features, which depend on each particular sound category. These results offer perspectives for understanding how human listeners store and access long-term sound representations, and sets the stage for the development of human-computer interfaces based on vocalizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5161510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51615102017-01-04 Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds Lemaitre, Guillaume Houix, Olivier Voisin, Frédéric Misdariis, Nicolas Susini, Patrick PLoS One Research Article Imitative behaviors are widespread in humans, in particular whenever two persons communicate and interact. Several tokens of spoken languages (onomatopoeias, ideophones, and phonesthemes) also display different degrees of iconicity between the sound of a word and what it refers to. Thus, it probably comes at no surprise that human speakers use a lot of imitative vocalizations and gestures when they communicate about sounds, as sounds are notably difficult to describe. What is more surprising is that vocal imitations of non-vocal everyday sounds (e.g. the sound of a car passing by) are in practice very effective: listeners identify sounds better with vocal imitations than with verbal descriptions, despite the fact that vocal imitations are inaccurate reproductions of a sound created by a particular mechanical system (e.g. a car driving by) through a different system (the voice apparatus). The present study investigated the semantic representations evoked by vocal imitations of sounds by experimentally quantifying how well listeners could match sounds to category labels. The experiment used three different types of sounds: recordings of easily identifiable sounds (sounds of human actions and manufactured products), human vocal imitations, and computational “auditory sketches” (created by algorithmic computations). The results show that performance with the best vocal imitations was similar to the best auditory sketches for most categories of sounds, and even to the referent sounds themselves in some cases. More detailed analyses showed that the acoustic distance between a vocal imitation and a referent sound is not sufficient to account for such performance. Analyses suggested that instead of trying to reproduce the referent sound as accurately as vocally possible, vocal imitations focus on a few important features, which depend on each particular sound category. These results offer perspectives for understanding how human listeners store and access long-term sound representations, and sets the stage for the development of human-computer interfaces based on vocalizations. Public Library of Science 2016-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5161510/ /pubmed/27992480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168167 Text en © 2016 Lemaitre et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lemaitre, Guillaume
Houix, Olivier
Voisin, Frédéric
Misdariis, Nicolas
Susini, Patrick
Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title_full Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title_fullStr Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title_full_unstemmed Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title_short Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds
title_sort vocal imitations of non-vocal sounds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168167
work_keys_str_mv AT lemaitreguillaume vocalimitationsofnonvocalsounds
AT houixolivier vocalimitationsofnonvocalsounds
AT voisinfrederic vocalimitationsofnonvocalsounds
AT misdariisnicolas vocalimitationsofnonvocalsounds
AT susinipatrick vocalimitationsofnonvocalsounds