Cargando…
A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845 |
_version_ | 1782482098908561408 |
---|---|
author | Stephenson-Jones, Marcus Yu, Kai Ahrens, Sandra Tucciarone, Jason M. van Huijstee, Aile N. Mejia, Luis A. Penzo, Mario A. Tai, Lung-Hao Wilbrecht, Linda Li, Bo |
author_facet | Stephenson-Jones, Marcus Yu, Kai Ahrens, Sandra Tucciarone, Jason M. van Huijstee, Aile N. Mejia, Luis A. Penzo, Mario A. Tai, Lung-Hao Wilbrecht, Linda Li, Bo |
author_sort | Stephenson-Jones, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear. Here we show that neurons in the habenula-projecting globus pallidus (GPh) are essential for evaluating action outcomes and are regulated by a specific set of inputs from the basal ganglia. We found in a classical conditioning task that individual mouse GPh neurons bidirectionally encode whether an outcome is better or worse than expected. Mimicking these evaluation signals with optogenetic inhibition or excitation is sufficient to reinforce or discourage actions in a decision making task. Moreover, cell-type-specific synaptic manipulations revealed that the inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the GPh are necessary for mice to appropriately evaluate positive and negative feedback, respectively. Finally, using rabies virus-assisted monosynaptic tracing(5), we discovered that the GPh is embedded in a basal ganglia circuit wherein it receives inhibitory input from both striosomal and matrix compartments of the striatum, and excitatory input from the “limbic” regions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Our results provide the first direct evidence that information about the selection and evaluation of actions is channelled through distinct sets of basal ganglia circuits, with the GPh representing a key locus where information of opposing valence is integrated to determine whether action outcomes are better or worse than expected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5161609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51616092017-03-21 A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes Stephenson-Jones, Marcus Yu, Kai Ahrens, Sandra Tucciarone, Jason M. van Huijstee, Aile N. Mejia, Luis A. Penzo, Mario A. Tai, Lung-Hao Wilbrecht, Linda Li, Bo Nature Article The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear. Here we show that neurons in the habenula-projecting globus pallidus (GPh) are essential for evaluating action outcomes and are regulated by a specific set of inputs from the basal ganglia. We found in a classical conditioning task that individual mouse GPh neurons bidirectionally encode whether an outcome is better or worse than expected. Mimicking these evaluation signals with optogenetic inhibition or excitation is sufficient to reinforce or discourage actions in a decision making task. Moreover, cell-type-specific synaptic manipulations revealed that the inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the GPh are necessary for mice to appropriately evaluate positive and negative feedback, respectively. Finally, using rabies virus-assisted monosynaptic tracing(5), we discovered that the GPh is embedded in a basal ganglia circuit wherein it receives inhibitory input from both striosomal and matrix compartments of the striatum, and excitatory input from the “limbic” regions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Our results provide the first direct evidence that information about the selection and evaluation of actions is channelled through distinct sets of basal ganglia circuits, with the GPh representing a key locus where information of opposing valence is integrated to determine whether action outcomes are better or worse than expected. 2016-09-21 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5161609/ /pubmed/27652894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints |
spellingShingle | Article Stephenson-Jones, Marcus Yu, Kai Ahrens, Sandra Tucciarone, Jason M. van Huijstee, Aile N. Mejia, Luis A. Penzo, Mario A. Tai, Lung-Hao Wilbrecht, Linda Li, Bo A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title | A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title_full | A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title_fullStr | A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title_short | A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
title_sort | basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephensonjonesmarcus abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT yukai abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT ahrenssandra abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT tucciaronejasonm abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT vanhuijsteeailen abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT mejialuisa abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT penzomarioa abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT tailunghao abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT wilbrechtlinda abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT libo abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT stephensonjonesmarcus basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT yukai basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT ahrenssandra basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT tucciaronejasonm basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT vanhuijsteeailen basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT mejialuisa basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT penzomarioa basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT tailunghao basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT wilbrechtlinda basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes AT libo basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes |