Cargando…

A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes

The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephenson-Jones, Marcus, Yu, Kai, Ahrens, Sandra, Tucciarone, Jason M., van Huijstee, Aile N., Mejia, Luis A., Penzo, Mario A., Tai, Lung-Hao, Wilbrecht, Linda, Li, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845
_version_ 1782482098908561408
author Stephenson-Jones, Marcus
Yu, Kai
Ahrens, Sandra
Tucciarone, Jason M.
van Huijstee, Aile N.
Mejia, Luis A.
Penzo, Mario A.
Tai, Lung-Hao
Wilbrecht, Linda
Li, Bo
author_facet Stephenson-Jones, Marcus
Yu, Kai
Ahrens, Sandra
Tucciarone, Jason M.
van Huijstee, Aile N.
Mejia, Luis A.
Penzo, Mario A.
Tai, Lung-Hao
Wilbrecht, Linda
Li, Bo
author_sort Stephenson-Jones, Marcus
collection PubMed
description The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear. Here we show that neurons in the habenula-projecting globus pallidus (GPh) are essential for evaluating action outcomes and are regulated by a specific set of inputs from the basal ganglia. We found in a classical conditioning task that individual mouse GPh neurons bidirectionally encode whether an outcome is better or worse than expected. Mimicking these evaluation signals with optogenetic inhibition or excitation is sufficient to reinforce or discourage actions in a decision making task. Moreover, cell-type-specific synaptic manipulations revealed that the inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the GPh are necessary for mice to appropriately evaluate positive and negative feedback, respectively. Finally, using rabies virus-assisted monosynaptic tracing(5), we discovered that the GPh is embedded in a basal ganglia circuit wherein it receives inhibitory input from both striosomal and matrix compartments of the striatum, and excitatory input from the “limbic” regions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Our results provide the first direct evidence that information about the selection and evaluation of actions is channelled through distinct sets of basal ganglia circuits, with the GPh representing a key locus where information of opposing valence is integrated to determine whether action outcomes are better or worse than expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5161609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51616092017-03-21 A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes Stephenson-Jones, Marcus Yu, Kai Ahrens, Sandra Tucciarone, Jason M. van Huijstee, Aile N. Mejia, Luis A. Penzo, Mario A. Tai, Lung-Hao Wilbrecht, Linda Li, Bo Nature Article The basal ganglia, a group of subcortical nuclei, play a crucial role in decision making by selecting actions and evaluating their outcomes(1,2). While much is known about the function of the basal ganglia circuitry in selection(1,3,4), how these nuclei contribute to outcome evaluation is less clear. Here we show that neurons in the habenula-projecting globus pallidus (GPh) are essential for evaluating action outcomes and are regulated by a specific set of inputs from the basal ganglia. We found in a classical conditioning task that individual mouse GPh neurons bidirectionally encode whether an outcome is better or worse than expected. Mimicking these evaluation signals with optogenetic inhibition or excitation is sufficient to reinforce or discourage actions in a decision making task. Moreover, cell-type-specific synaptic manipulations revealed that the inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the GPh are necessary for mice to appropriately evaluate positive and negative feedback, respectively. Finally, using rabies virus-assisted monosynaptic tracing(5), we discovered that the GPh is embedded in a basal ganglia circuit wherein it receives inhibitory input from both striosomal and matrix compartments of the striatum, and excitatory input from the “limbic” regions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Our results provide the first direct evidence that information about the selection and evaluation of actions is channelled through distinct sets of basal ganglia circuits, with the GPh representing a key locus where information of opposing valence is integrated to determine whether action outcomes are better or worse than expected. 2016-09-21 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5161609/ /pubmed/27652894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints
spellingShingle Article
Stephenson-Jones, Marcus
Yu, Kai
Ahrens, Sandra
Tucciarone, Jason M.
van Huijstee, Aile N.
Mejia, Luis A.
Penzo, Mario A.
Tai, Lung-Hao
Wilbrecht, Linda
Li, Bo
A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title_full A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title_fullStr A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title_full_unstemmed A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title_short A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
title_sort basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19845
work_keys_str_mv AT stephensonjonesmarcus abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT yukai abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT ahrenssandra abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT tucciaronejasonm abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT vanhuijsteeailen abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT mejialuisa abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT penzomarioa abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT tailunghao abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT wilbrechtlinda abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT libo abasalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT stephensonjonesmarcus basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT yukai basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT ahrenssandra basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT tucciaronejasonm basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT vanhuijsteeailen basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT mejialuisa basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT penzomarioa basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT tailunghao basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT wilbrechtlinda basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes
AT libo basalgangliacircuitforevaluatingactionoutcomes