Cargando…

Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors

BACKGROUND: Learning to perform pelvic and breast examinations produces anxiety for many medical students. Clerkship directors have long sought strategies to help students become comfortable with the sensitive nature of these examinations. Incorporating standardized patients, simulation and gynecolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugoff, Lorraine, Pradhan, Archana, Casey, Petra, Dalrymple, John L., Abbott, Jodi F., Buery-Joyner, Samantha D., Chuang, Alice, Cullimore, Amie J., Forstein, David A., Hampton, Brittany S., Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M., Katz, Nadine T., Nuthalapaty, Francis S., Page-Ramsey, Sarah M., Wolf, Abigail, Hueppchen, Nancy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5162080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27986086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6
_version_ 1782482172943269888
author Dugoff, Lorraine
Pradhan, Archana
Casey, Petra
Dalrymple, John L.
Abbott, Jodi F.
Buery-Joyner, Samantha D.
Chuang, Alice
Cullimore, Amie J.
Forstein, David A.
Hampton, Brittany S.
Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M.
Katz, Nadine T.
Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
Page-Ramsey, Sarah M.
Wolf, Abigail
Hueppchen, Nancy A.
author_facet Dugoff, Lorraine
Pradhan, Archana
Casey, Petra
Dalrymple, John L.
Abbott, Jodi F.
Buery-Joyner, Samantha D.
Chuang, Alice
Cullimore, Amie J.
Forstein, David A.
Hampton, Brittany S.
Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M.
Katz, Nadine T.
Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
Page-Ramsey, Sarah M.
Wolf, Abigail
Hueppchen, Nancy A.
author_sort Dugoff, Lorraine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning to perform pelvic and breast examinations produces anxiety for many medical students. Clerkship directors have long sought strategies to help students become comfortable with the sensitive nature of these examinations. Incorporating standardized patients, simulation and gynecologic teaching associates (GTAs) are approaches gaining widespread use. However, there is a paucity of literature guiding optimal approach and timing. Our primary objective was to survey obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clerkship directors regarding timing and methods for teaching and assessment of pelvic and breast examination skills in United States medical school curricula, and to assess clerkship director satisfaction with current educational strategies at their institutions. METHODS: Ob/Gyn clerkship directors from all 135 Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredited allopathic United States medical schools were invited to complete an anonymous 15-item web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 70%. Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the second and third years of medical school. Pelvic examinations are primarily taught during the Ob/Gyn and Family Medicine (FM) clerkships, while breast examinations are taught during the Ob/Gyn, Surgery and FM clerkships. GTAs teach pelvic and breast examinations at 72 and 65% of schools, respectively. Over 60% of schools use some type of simulation to teach examination skills. Direct observation by Ob/Gyn faculty is used to evaluate pelvic exam skills at 87% of schools and breast exam skills at 80% of schools. Only 40% of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors rated pelvic examination training as excellent, while 18% rated breast examination training as excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the Ob/Gyn clerkship using GTAs, simulation trainers and clinical patients, and are assessed by direct faculty observation during the Ob/Gyn clerkship. While the majority of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors were not highly satisfied with either pelvic or breast examination training programs, they were less likely to describe their breast examination training programs as excellent as compared to pelvic examination training—overall suggesting an opportunity for improvement. The survey results will be useful in identifying future challenges in teaching such skills in a cost-effective manner. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5162080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51620802016-12-23 Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors Dugoff, Lorraine Pradhan, Archana Casey, Petra Dalrymple, John L. Abbott, Jodi F. Buery-Joyner, Samantha D. Chuang, Alice Cullimore, Amie J. Forstein, David A. Hampton, Brittany S. Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M. Katz, Nadine T. Nuthalapaty, Francis S. Page-Ramsey, Sarah M. Wolf, Abigail Hueppchen, Nancy A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Learning to perform pelvic and breast examinations produces anxiety for many medical students. Clerkship directors have long sought strategies to help students become comfortable with the sensitive nature of these examinations. Incorporating standardized patients, simulation and gynecologic teaching associates (GTAs) are approaches gaining widespread use. However, there is a paucity of literature guiding optimal approach and timing. Our primary objective was to survey obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clerkship directors regarding timing and methods for teaching and assessment of pelvic and breast examination skills in United States medical school curricula, and to assess clerkship director satisfaction with current educational strategies at their institutions. METHODS: Ob/Gyn clerkship directors from all 135 Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredited allopathic United States medical schools were invited to complete an anonymous 15-item web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 70%. Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the second and third years of medical school. Pelvic examinations are primarily taught during the Ob/Gyn and Family Medicine (FM) clerkships, while breast examinations are taught during the Ob/Gyn, Surgery and FM clerkships. GTAs teach pelvic and breast examinations at 72 and 65% of schools, respectively. Over 60% of schools use some type of simulation to teach examination skills. Direct observation by Ob/Gyn faculty is used to evaluate pelvic exam skills at 87% of schools and breast exam skills at 80% of schools. Only 40% of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors rated pelvic examination training as excellent, while 18% rated breast examination training as excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the Ob/Gyn clerkship using GTAs, simulation trainers and clinical patients, and are assessed by direct faculty observation during the Ob/Gyn clerkship. While the majority of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors were not highly satisfied with either pelvic or breast examination training programs, they were less likely to describe their breast examination training programs as excellent as compared to pelvic examination training—overall suggesting an opportunity for improvement. The survey results will be useful in identifying future challenges in teaching such skills in a cost-effective manner. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5162080/ /pubmed/27986086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dugoff, Lorraine
Pradhan, Archana
Casey, Petra
Dalrymple, John L.
Abbott, Jodi F.
Buery-Joyner, Samantha D.
Chuang, Alice
Cullimore, Amie J.
Forstein, David A.
Hampton, Brittany S.
Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M.
Katz, Nadine T.
Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
Page-Ramsey, Sarah M.
Wolf, Abigail
Hueppchen, Nancy A.
Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title_full Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title_fullStr Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title_short Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
title_sort pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in united states medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5162080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27986086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dugofflorraine pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT pradhanarchana pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT caseypetra pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT dalrymplejohnl pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT abbottjodif pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT bueryjoynersamanthad pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT chuangalice pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT cullimoreamiej pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT forsteindavida pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT hamptonbrittanys pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT kaczmarczykjosephm pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT katznadinet pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT nuthalapatyfranciss pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT pageramseysarahm pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT wolfabigail pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors
AT hueppchennancya pelvicandbreastexaminationskillscurriculainunitedstatesmedicalschoolsasurveyofobstetricsandgynecologyclerkshipdirectors