Cargando…

Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in a cohort of patients and compare with available historical data on SSI in open spinal surgery cohorts, and to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao, Patel, Ravish Shammi, Dutta, Shumayou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5164988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1000
_version_ 1782482760688992256
author Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao
Patel, Ravish Shammi
Dutta, Shumayou
author_facet Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao
Patel, Ravish Shammi
Dutta, Shumayou
author_sort Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in a cohort of patients and compare with available historical data on SSI in open spinal surgery cohorts, and to evaluate additional direct costs incurred due to SSI. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: SSI can lead to prolonged antibiotic therapy, extended hospitalization, repeated operations, and implant removal. Small incisions and minimal dissection intrinsic to MISS may minimize the risk of postoperative infections. However, there is a dearth of literature on infections after MISS and their additional direct financial implications. METHODS: All patients from January 2007 to January 2015 undergoing posterior spinal surgery with tubular retractor system and microscope in our institution were included. The procedures performed included tubular discectomies, tubular decompressions for spinal stenosis and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The incidence of postoperative SSI was calculated and compared to the range of cited SSI rates from published studies. Direct costs were calculated from medical billing for index cases and for patients with SSI. RESULTS: A total of 1,043 patients underwent 763 noninstrumented surgeries (discectomies, decompressions) and 280 instrumented (TLIF) procedures. The mean age was 52.2 years with male:female ratio of 1.08:1. Three infections were encountered with fusion surgeries (mean detection time, 7 days). All three required wound wash and debridement with one patient requiring unilateral implant removal. Additional direct cost due to infection was $2,678 per 100 MISS-TLIF. SSI increased hospital expenditure per patient 1.5-fold after instrumented MISS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall infection rate after MISS was 0.29%, with SSI rate of 0% in non-instrumented MISS and 1.07% with instrumented MISS. MISS can markedly reduce the SSI rate and can be an effective tool to minimize hospital costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5164988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51649882016-12-19 Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections? Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao Patel, Ravish Shammi Dutta, Shumayou Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in a cohort of patients and compare with available historical data on SSI in open spinal surgery cohorts, and to evaluate additional direct costs incurred due to SSI. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: SSI can lead to prolonged antibiotic therapy, extended hospitalization, repeated operations, and implant removal. Small incisions and minimal dissection intrinsic to MISS may minimize the risk of postoperative infections. However, there is a dearth of literature on infections after MISS and their additional direct financial implications. METHODS: All patients from January 2007 to January 2015 undergoing posterior spinal surgery with tubular retractor system and microscope in our institution were included. The procedures performed included tubular discectomies, tubular decompressions for spinal stenosis and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The incidence of postoperative SSI was calculated and compared to the range of cited SSI rates from published studies. Direct costs were calculated from medical billing for index cases and for patients with SSI. RESULTS: A total of 1,043 patients underwent 763 noninstrumented surgeries (discectomies, decompressions) and 280 instrumented (TLIF) procedures. The mean age was 52.2 years with male:female ratio of 1.08:1. Three infections were encountered with fusion surgeries (mean detection time, 7 days). All three required wound wash and debridement with one patient requiring unilateral implant removal. Additional direct cost due to infection was $2,678 per 100 MISS-TLIF. SSI increased hospital expenditure per patient 1.5-fold after instrumented MISS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall infection rate after MISS was 0.29%, with SSI rate of 0% in non-instrumented MISS and 1.07% with instrumented MISS. MISS can markedly reduce the SSI rate and can be an effective tool to minimize hospital costs. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016-12 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5164988/ /pubmed/27994774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1000 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao
Patel, Ravish Shammi
Dutta, Shumayou
Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title_full Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title_fullStr Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title_full_unstemmed Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title_short Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?
title_sort does minimally invasive spine surgery minimize surgical site infections?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5164988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1000
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarniarvindgopalrao doesminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryminimizesurgicalsiteinfections
AT patelravishshammi doesminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryminimizesurgicalsiteinfections
AT duttashumayou doesminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryminimizesurgicalsiteinfections