Cargando…
Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase
This short review on current treatment options in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase summarizes the latest version of the ELN treatment recommendations dating from 2013 and indicates treatment situations not yet reflected in these recommendations. Daily practice in CML management is...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5165029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28058062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-016-0299-8 |
_version_ | 1782482769334501376 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Stefan |
author_facet | Schmidt, Stefan |
author_sort | Schmidt, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This short review on current treatment options in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase summarizes the latest version of the ELN treatment recommendations dating from 2013 and indicates treatment situations not yet reflected in these recommendations. Daily practice in CML management is complicated by the recently observed treatment-emergent vascular and pulmonary adverse events in second- or later-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the lack of guidance with respect to the best TKI for initial treatment, as well as the optimal TKI sequence because no prospective randomized comparative data for second- and third-generation TKIs are available. Physicians have to balance the efficacy issues and safety aspects of the respective TKI and consider patient-specific factors such as comorbidities. Patients with any cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or treatment-requiring cardiovascular risk factor should receive nilotinib or ponatinib only if risk factors and comorbidities are treated accordingly and are further monitored. If these comorbidities are insufficiently controlled, other TKIs might be preferred. Dasatinib treatment should be critically evaluated in patients with pulmonary disease and other TKIs might be preferred in this setting. For as long as CML treatment is considered to be maintained lifelong, and no survival benefit for later-generation TKIs has been demonstrated, safety issues dominate the choice of treatment options. The concept of discontinuing TKI treatment after achieving a deep molecular response might in future change these considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5165029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51650292017-01-03 Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase Schmidt, Stefan Memo Short Review This short review on current treatment options in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase summarizes the latest version of the ELN treatment recommendations dating from 2013 and indicates treatment situations not yet reflected in these recommendations. Daily practice in CML management is complicated by the recently observed treatment-emergent vascular and pulmonary adverse events in second- or later-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the lack of guidance with respect to the best TKI for initial treatment, as well as the optimal TKI sequence because no prospective randomized comparative data for second- and third-generation TKIs are available. Physicians have to balance the efficacy issues and safety aspects of the respective TKI and consider patient-specific factors such as comorbidities. Patients with any cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or treatment-requiring cardiovascular risk factor should receive nilotinib or ponatinib only if risk factors and comorbidities are treated accordingly and are further monitored. If these comorbidities are insufficiently controlled, other TKIs might be preferred. Dasatinib treatment should be critically evaluated in patients with pulmonary disease and other TKIs might be preferred in this setting. For as long as CML treatment is considered to be maintained lifelong, and no survival benefit for later-generation TKIs has been demonstrated, safety issues dominate the choice of treatment options. The concept of discontinuing TKI treatment after achieving a deep molecular response might in future change these considerations. Springer Vienna 2016-12-14 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5165029/ /pubmed/28058062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-016-0299-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Short Review Schmidt, Stefan Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title | Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title_full | Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title_fullStr | Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title_full_unstemmed | Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title_short | Short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
title_sort | short overview on the current treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase |
topic | Short Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5165029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28058062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-016-0299-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtstefan shortoverviewonthecurrenttreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiainchronicphase |