Cargando…

Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the treatment of skeletal open bites and to compare the results with untreated controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of forty patients with skeletal anterior open bites were assigned to two gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turkkahraman, Hakan, Sarioglu, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5166297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195169
_version_ 1782482999410950144
author Turkkahraman, Hakan
Sarioglu, Mehmet
author_facet Turkkahraman, Hakan
Sarioglu, Mehmet
author_sort Turkkahraman, Hakan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the treatment of skeletal open bites and to compare the results with untreated controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of forty patients with skeletal anterior open bites were assigned to two groups of twenty each. The mean chronological age for the treatment group (14 female, 6 male) was 16.68 ± 2.80 years old, compared with 16.63 ± 2.83 years old for the control group (11 female, 9 male). Titanium miniplates fixed bilaterally to the infrazygomatic crest area were used as TADs and intrusive forces were applied to the posterior teeth with Ni-Ti coil springs. The treatment and normal growth changes were evaluated using 24 measurements (2 angular, 22 linear). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in Bx, By, Sn/GoGn, Ax-Bx, U6x, U6y, overjet, overbite, SN/OccP, N-Me, Ans-Me, S-Go/N-Me, interpremolar width, and intermolar width (P < 0.05). In the treatment group, statistically significant upper molar intrusion (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 3.59 ± 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.96–4.22), posterior rotation of the occlusal plane (mean ± SD, 3.42 ± 2.17; 95% CI, 2.39–4.43), anterior rotation of the mandible (mean ± SD, 2.25 ± 1.91; 95% CI, 1.36–3.14), and resultant overbite improvement (mean ± SD, 4.82 ± 1.53; 95% CI, 4.10–5.53) were found (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate skeletal anterior open bites could easily be treated with TADs without orthognathic surgery. With the rigid anchorage of miniplates, true molar intrusion of up to 4 mm was achieved. With molar intrusion, anterior rotation of the mandible and a significant reduction in anterior face height were determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5166297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51662972016-12-30 Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites? Turkkahraman, Hakan Sarioglu, Mehmet Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the treatment of skeletal open bites and to compare the results with untreated controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of forty patients with skeletal anterior open bites were assigned to two groups of twenty each. The mean chronological age for the treatment group (14 female, 6 male) was 16.68 ± 2.80 years old, compared with 16.63 ± 2.83 years old for the control group (11 female, 9 male). Titanium miniplates fixed bilaterally to the infrazygomatic crest area were used as TADs and intrusive forces were applied to the posterior teeth with Ni-Ti coil springs. The treatment and normal growth changes were evaluated using 24 measurements (2 angular, 22 linear). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in Bx, By, Sn/GoGn, Ax-Bx, U6x, U6y, overjet, overbite, SN/OccP, N-Me, Ans-Me, S-Go/N-Me, interpremolar width, and intermolar width (P < 0.05). In the treatment group, statistically significant upper molar intrusion (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 3.59 ± 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.96–4.22), posterior rotation of the occlusal plane (mean ± SD, 3.42 ± 2.17; 95% CI, 2.39–4.43), anterior rotation of the mandible (mean ± SD, 2.25 ± 1.91; 95% CI, 1.36–3.14), and resultant overbite improvement (mean ± SD, 4.82 ± 1.53; 95% CI, 4.10–5.53) were found (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate skeletal anterior open bites could easily be treated with TADs without orthognathic surgery. With the rigid anchorage of miniplates, true molar intrusion of up to 4 mm was achieved. With molar intrusion, anterior rotation of the mandible and a significant reduction in anterior face height were determined. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5166297/ /pubmed/28042256 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195169 Text en Copyright: © 2016 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Turkkahraman, Hakan
Sarioglu, Mehmet
Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title_full Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title_fullStr Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title_full_unstemmed Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title_short Are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
title_sort are temporary anchorage devices truly effective in the treatment of skeletal open bites?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5166297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195169
work_keys_str_mv AT turkkahramanhakan aretemporaryanchoragedevicestrulyeffectiveinthetreatmentofskeletalopenbites
AT sarioglumehmet aretemporaryanchoragedevicestrulyeffectiveinthetreatmentofskeletalopenbites