Cargando…

Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure among three different post materials in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty extracted primary anterior teeth were selected for the study. The samples were divided into thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilavarasan, Nilavu, Hemalatha, R., Vijayakumar, R., Hariharan, V. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5166300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042259
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195181
_version_ 1782483000072601600
author Nilavarasan, Nilavu
Hemalatha, R.
Vijayakumar, R.
Hariharan, V. S.
author_facet Nilavarasan, Nilavu
Hemalatha, R.
Vijayakumar, R.
Hariharan, V. S.
author_sort Nilavarasan, Nilavu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure among three different post materials in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty extracted primary anterior teeth were selected for the study. The samples were divided into three groups of twenty teeth each: Group I (Ribbond), Group II (Omega loop), and Group III (Glass fiber post). Pulp therapy was followed by intracanal post and crown buildup. The samples were mounted in self-cure acrylic and subjected to compressive strength test using universal testing machine (Instron). The maximum force at which the tooth fractured was recorded. RESULTS: The values were subjected to one-way analysis of variance. The mean compressive strength values of Ribbond, omega loop, and glass fiber post were found to be 83.25 N, 61.60 N, and 75.55 N, respectively. The P value was found to be 0.220. CONCLUSION: Group I (Ribbond) showed the highest fracture resistance values followed by Group III (Glass fiber post) and Group II (Omega loop). Although there is difference in mean values, they were nonsignificant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5166300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51663002016-12-30 Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study Nilavarasan, Nilavu Hemalatha, R. Vijayakumar, R. Hariharan, V. S. Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure among three different post materials in primary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty extracted primary anterior teeth were selected for the study. The samples were divided into three groups of twenty teeth each: Group I (Ribbond), Group II (Omega loop), and Group III (Glass fiber post). Pulp therapy was followed by intracanal post and crown buildup. The samples were mounted in self-cure acrylic and subjected to compressive strength test using universal testing machine (Instron). The maximum force at which the tooth fractured was recorded. RESULTS: The values were subjected to one-way analysis of variance. The mean compressive strength values of Ribbond, omega loop, and glass fiber post were found to be 83.25 N, 61.60 N, and 75.55 N, respectively. The P value was found to be 0.220. CONCLUSION: Group I (Ribbond) showed the highest fracture resistance values followed by Group III (Glass fiber post) and Group II (Omega loop). Although there is difference in mean values, they were nonsignificant. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5166300/ /pubmed/28042259 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195181 Text en Copyright: © 2016 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nilavarasan, Nilavu
Hemalatha, R.
Vijayakumar, R.
Hariharan, V. S.
Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of compressive strength among three different intracanal post materials in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5166300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042259
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195181
work_keys_str_mv AT nilavarasannilavu comparisonofcompressivestrengthamongthreedifferentintracanalpostmaterialsinprimaryanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT hemalathar comparisonofcompressivestrengthamongthreedifferentintracanalpostmaterialsinprimaryanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT vijayakumarr comparisonofcompressivestrengthamongthreedifferentintracanalpostmaterialsinprimaryanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT hariharanvs comparisonofcompressivestrengthamongthreedifferentintracanalpostmaterialsinprimaryanteriorteethaninvitrostudy