Cargando…
In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist
Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low‐risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine‐scale reactive avoidance may minimize t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2569 |
_version_ | 1782483124821688320 |
---|---|
author | Swanson, Alexandra Arnold, Todd Kosmala, Margaret Forester, James Packer, Craig |
author_facet | Swanson, Alexandra Arnold, Todd Kosmala, Margaret Forester, James Packer, Craig |
author_sort | Swanson, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low‐risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine‐scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine‐scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km(2) in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time‐to‐event models to evaluate fine‐scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long‐term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long‐term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment‐to‐moment basis. Such fine‐scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long‐term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion‐inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51670312016-12-28 In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist Swanson, Alexandra Arnold, Todd Kosmala, Margaret Forester, James Packer, Craig Ecol Evol Original Research Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low‐risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine‐scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine‐scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km(2) in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time‐to‐event models to evaluate fine‐scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long‐term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long‐term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment‐to‐moment basis. Such fine‐scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long‐term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion‐inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5167031/ /pubmed/28031805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2569 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Swanson, Alexandra Arnold, Todd Kosmala, Margaret Forester, James Packer, Craig In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title | In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title_full | In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title_fullStr | In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title_full_unstemmed | In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title_short | In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
title_sort | in the absence of a “landscape of fear”: how lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swansonalexandra intheabsenceofalandscapeoffearhowlionshyenasandcheetahscoexist AT arnoldtodd intheabsenceofalandscapeoffearhowlionshyenasandcheetahscoexist AT kosmalamargaret intheabsenceofalandscapeoffearhowlionshyenasandcheetahscoexist AT foresterjames intheabsenceofalandscapeoffearhowlionshyenasandcheetahscoexist AT packercraig intheabsenceofalandscapeoffearhowlionshyenasandcheetahscoexist |