Cargando…

Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle

Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogdziewicz, Michał, Zwolak, Rafał, Redosh, Lauren, Rychlik, Leszek, Crone, Elizabeth E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513
_version_ 1782483125978267648
author Bogdziewicz, Michał
Zwolak, Rafał
Redosh, Lauren
Rychlik, Leszek
Crone, Elizabeth E.
author_facet Bogdziewicz, Michał
Zwolak, Rafał
Redosh, Lauren
Rychlik, Leszek
Crone, Elizabeth E.
author_sort Bogdziewicz, Michał
collection PubMed
description Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with population density in the yellow‐necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). The relationship between population density and home range size was studied at two distinct phases of population fluctuations induced by beech (Fagus sylvatica) masting: post‐mast peak in abundance (first summer after mast, n = 2) and subsequent crash (second summer after mast, n = 2). We live‐trapped mice from June to September to avoid the confounding effects of autumn seedfall on home range size. In accordance with general predictions, we found that home range size was negatively associated with population density. However, after controlling for the effect of density, home ranges of mice were larger in post‐mast years than during the crash phase. This indicates a higher spatial overlap among neighbors in post‐mast years. We suggest that the increased spatial overlap is caused by negative density‐dependent dispersal that leads to high relatedness of individuals within population in the peak phase of the cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5167038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51670382016-12-28 Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle Bogdziewicz, Michał Zwolak, Rafał Redosh, Lauren Rychlik, Leszek Crone, Elizabeth E. Ecol Evol Original Research Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with population density in the yellow‐necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). The relationship between population density and home range size was studied at two distinct phases of population fluctuations induced by beech (Fagus sylvatica) masting: post‐mast peak in abundance (first summer after mast, n = 2) and subsequent crash (second summer after mast, n = 2). We live‐trapped mice from June to September to avoid the confounding effects of autumn seedfall on home range size. In accordance with general predictions, we found that home range size was negatively associated with population density. However, after controlling for the effect of density, home ranges of mice were larger in post‐mast years than during the crash phase. This indicates a higher spatial overlap among neighbors in post‐mast years. We suggest that the increased spatial overlap is caused by negative density‐dependent dispersal that leads to high relatedness of individuals within population in the peak phase of the cycle. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5167038/ /pubmed/28031794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bogdziewicz, Michał
Zwolak, Rafał
Redosh, Lauren
Rychlik, Leszek
Crone, Elizabeth E.
Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title_full Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title_fullStr Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title_full_unstemmed Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title_short Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
title_sort negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdziewiczmichał negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle
AT zwolakrafał negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle
AT redoshlauren negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle
AT rychlikleszek negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle
AT croneelizabethe negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle