Cargando…
Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle
Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with popula...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513 |
_version_ | 1782483125978267648 |
---|---|
author | Bogdziewicz, Michał Zwolak, Rafał Redosh, Lauren Rychlik, Leszek Crone, Elizabeth E. |
author_facet | Bogdziewicz, Michał Zwolak, Rafał Redosh, Lauren Rychlik, Leszek Crone, Elizabeth E. |
author_sort | Bogdziewicz, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with population density in the yellow‐necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). The relationship between population density and home range size was studied at two distinct phases of population fluctuations induced by beech (Fagus sylvatica) masting: post‐mast peak in abundance (first summer after mast, n = 2) and subsequent crash (second summer after mast, n = 2). We live‐trapped mice from June to September to avoid the confounding effects of autumn seedfall on home range size. In accordance with general predictions, we found that home range size was negatively associated with population density. However, after controlling for the effect of density, home ranges of mice were larger in post‐mast years than during the crash phase. This indicates a higher spatial overlap among neighbors in post‐mast years. We suggest that the increased spatial overlap is caused by negative density‐dependent dispersal that leads to high relatedness of individuals within population in the peak phase of the cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51670382016-12-28 Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle Bogdziewicz, Michał Zwolak, Rafał Redosh, Lauren Rychlik, Leszek Crone, Elizabeth E. Ecol Evol Original Research Home range size generally decreases with increasing population density, but testing how this relationship is influenced by other factors (e.g., food availability, kin structure) is a difficult task. We used spatially explicit capture–recapture models to examine how home range size varies with population density in the yellow‐necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). The relationship between population density and home range size was studied at two distinct phases of population fluctuations induced by beech (Fagus sylvatica) masting: post‐mast peak in abundance (first summer after mast, n = 2) and subsequent crash (second summer after mast, n = 2). We live‐trapped mice from June to September to avoid the confounding effects of autumn seedfall on home range size. In accordance with general predictions, we found that home range size was negatively associated with population density. However, after controlling for the effect of density, home ranges of mice were larger in post‐mast years than during the crash phase. This indicates a higher spatial overlap among neighbors in post‐mast years. We suggest that the increased spatial overlap is caused by negative density‐dependent dispersal that leads to high relatedness of individuals within population in the peak phase of the cycle. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5167038/ /pubmed/28031794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bogdziewicz, Michał Zwolak, Rafał Redosh, Lauren Rychlik, Leszek Crone, Elizabeth E. Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title | Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title_full | Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title_fullStr | Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title_full_unstemmed | Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title_short | Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
title_sort | negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting‐induced population cycle |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdziewiczmichał negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle AT zwolakrafał negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle AT redoshlauren negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle AT rychlikleszek negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle AT croneelizabethe negativeeffectsofdensityonspaceuseofsmallmammalsdifferwiththephaseofthemastinginducedpopulationcycle |