Cargando…

Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology

Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noonan, Michael J., Johnson, Paul J., Kitchener, Andrew C., Harrington, Lauren A., Newman, Chris, Macdonald, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480
_version_ 1782483127323590656
author Noonan, Michael J.
Johnson, Paul J.
Kitchener, Andrew C.
Harrington, Lauren A.
Newman, Chris
Macdonald, David W.
author_facet Noonan, Michael J.
Johnson, Paul J.
Kitchener, Andrew C.
Harrington, Lauren A.
Newman, Chris
Macdonald, David W.
author_sort Noonan, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size is constrained by the energetics of rearing offspring. This rule holds for a variety of vertebrate taxa, and opposing trends are rare. We examine the allometry of SSD within the Musteloidea and demonstrate a hypo‐allometry contrary to Rensch's rule, with lower SSD associated with larger body size. We provide evidence that feeding ecology is involved. Where diet promotes group‐living, the optimal strategy for the males of larger species is often not to attempt to defend access to multiple females, obviating any competitive advantage of relatively greater size. We conclude that the effect of feeding ecology on mating systems may be a hitherto neglected factor explaining variation in SSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5167046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51670462016-12-28 Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology Noonan, Michael J. Johnson, Paul J. Kitchener, Andrew C. Harrington, Lauren A. Newman, Chris Macdonald, David W. Ecol Evol Original Research Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size is constrained by the energetics of rearing offspring. This rule holds for a variety of vertebrate taxa, and opposing trends are rare. We examine the allometry of SSD within the Musteloidea and demonstrate a hypo‐allometry contrary to Rensch's rule, with lower SSD associated with larger body size. We provide evidence that feeding ecology is involved. Where diet promotes group‐living, the optimal strategy for the males of larger species is often not to attempt to defend access to multiple females, obviating any competitive advantage of relatively greater size. We conclude that the effect of feeding ecology on mating systems may be a hitherto neglected factor explaining variation in SSD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5167046/ /pubmed/28031801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Noonan, Michael J.
Johnson, Paul J.
Kitchener, Andrew C.
Harrington, Lauren A.
Newman, Chris
Macdonald, David W.
Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title_full Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title_fullStr Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title_full_unstemmed Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title_short Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
title_sort sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: an anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480
work_keys_str_mv AT noonanmichaelj sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology
AT johnsonpaulj sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology
AT kitchenerandrewc sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology
AT harringtonlaurena sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology
AT newmanchris sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology
AT macdonalddavidw sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology