Cargando…
Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology
Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480 |
_version_ | 1782483127323590656 |
---|---|
author | Noonan, Michael J. Johnson, Paul J. Kitchener, Andrew C. Harrington, Lauren A. Newman, Chris Macdonald, David W. |
author_facet | Noonan, Michael J. Johnson, Paul J. Kitchener, Andrew C. Harrington, Lauren A. Newman, Chris Macdonald, David W. |
author_sort | Noonan, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size is constrained by the energetics of rearing offspring. This rule holds for a variety of vertebrate taxa, and opposing trends are rare. We examine the allometry of SSD within the Musteloidea and demonstrate a hypo‐allometry contrary to Rensch's rule, with lower SSD associated with larger body size. We provide evidence that feeding ecology is involved. Where diet promotes group‐living, the optimal strategy for the males of larger species is often not to attempt to defend access to multiple females, obviating any competitive advantage of relatively greater size. We conclude that the effect of feeding ecology on mating systems may be a hitherto neglected factor explaining variation in SSD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51670462016-12-28 Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology Noonan, Michael J. Johnson, Paul J. Kitchener, Andrew C. Harrington, Lauren A. Newman, Chris Macdonald, David W. Ecol Evol Original Research Rensch's rule states that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size in taxa where males are larger, and decreases when females are larger. The dominant explanation for the trend is currently that competitive advantage for males is greater in larger individuals, whereas female size is constrained by the energetics of rearing offspring. This rule holds for a variety of vertebrate taxa, and opposing trends are rare. We examine the allometry of SSD within the Musteloidea and demonstrate a hypo‐allometry contrary to Rensch's rule, with lower SSD associated with larger body size. We provide evidence that feeding ecology is involved. Where diet promotes group‐living, the optimal strategy for the males of larger species is often not to attempt to defend access to multiple females, obviating any competitive advantage of relatively greater size. We conclude that the effect of feeding ecology on mating systems may be a hitherto neglected factor explaining variation in SSD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5167046/ /pubmed/28031801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Noonan, Michael J. Johnson, Paul J. Kitchener, Andrew C. Harrington, Lauren A. Newman, Chris Macdonald, David W. Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title | Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title_full | Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title_fullStr | Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title_short | Sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: An anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
title_sort | sexual size dimorphism in musteloids: an anomalous allometric pattern is explained by feeding ecology |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noonanmichaelj sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology AT johnsonpaulj sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology AT kitchenerandrewc sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology AT harringtonlaurena sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology AT newmanchris sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology AT macdonalddavidw sexualsizedimorphisminmusteloidsananomalousallometricpatternisexplainedbyfeedingecology |