Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201 |
_version_ | 1782483147201445888 |
---|---|
author | Qi, Qingqing Guo, Chuanguo Ji, Rui Li, Zhen Zuo, Xiuli Li, Yanqing |
author_facet | Qi, Qingqing Guo, Chuanguo Ji, Rui Li, Zhen Zuo, Xiuli Li, Yanqing |
author_sort | Qi, Qingqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection. A summary receiver operator characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies involving 1897 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy to predict H. pylori infection were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.91] and 0.82 (95%CI 0.79–0.85), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9461. When targeting the gastric antrum, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI 0.78–0.86) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.66–0.78), respectively. When targeting the gastric corpus, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI 0.90–0.94) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.88), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying white light endoscopy were 0.90 (95%CI 0.87–0.91) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying chromoendoscopy were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83–0.91) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.80–0.88), respectively. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus observed by magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, as indicated by a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.87–0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9872. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, either in magnifying white light endoscopy or magnifying chromoendoscopy mode. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus is an optimum diagnostic criterion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51672612017-01-04 Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis Qi, Qingqing Guo, Chuanguo Ji, Rui Li, Zhen Zuo, Xiuli Li, Yanqing PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection. A summary receiver operator characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies involving 1897 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy to predict H. pylori infection were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.91] and 0.82 (95%CI 0.79–0.85), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9461. When targeting the gastric antrum, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI 0.78–0.86) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.66–0.78), respectively. When targeting the gastric corpus, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI 0.90–0.94) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.88), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying white light endoscopy were 0.90 (95%CI 0.87–0.91) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying chromoendoscopy were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83–0.91) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.80–0.88), respectively. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus observed by magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, as indicated by a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.87–0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9872. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, either in magnifying white light endoscopy or magnifying chromoendoscopy mode. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus is an optimum diagnostic criterion. Public Library of Science 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5167261/ /pubmed/27992489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201 Text en © 2016 Qi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Qi, Qingqing Guo, Chuanguo Ji, Rui Li, Zhen Zuo, Xiuli Li, Yanqing Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy for helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiqingqing diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis AT guochuanguo diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis AT jirui diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis AT lizhen diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis AT zuoxiuli diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis AT liyanqing diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis |