Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Qingqing, Guo, Chuanguo, Ji, Rui, Li, Zhen, Zuo, Xiuli, Li, Yanqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201
_version_ 1782483147201445888
author Qi, Qingqing
Guo, Chuanguo
Ji, Rui
Li, Zhen
Zuo, Xiuli
Li, Yanqing
author_facet Qi, Qingqing
Guo, Chuanguo
Ji, Rui
Li, Zhen
Zuo, Xiuli
Li, Yanqing
author_sort Qi, Qingqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection. A summary receiver operator characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies involving 1897 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy to predict H. pylori infection were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.91] and 0.82 (95%CI 0.79–0.85), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9461. When targeting the gastric antrum, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI 0.78–0.86) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.66–0.78), respectively. When targeting the gastric corpus, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI 0.90–0.94) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.88), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying white light endoscopy were 0.90 (95%CI 0.87–0.91) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying chromoendoscopy were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83–0.91) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.80–0.88), respectively. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus observed by magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, as indicated by a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.87–0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9872. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, either in magnifying white light endoscopy or magnifying chromoendoscopy mode. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus is an optimum diagnostic criterion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5167261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51672612017-01-04 Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis Qi, Qingqing Guo, Chuanguo Ji, Rui Li, Zhen Zuo, Xiuli Li, Yanqing PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection. A summary receiver operator characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies involving 1897 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy to predict H. pylori infection were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.91] and 0.82 (95%CI 0.79–0.85), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9461. When targeting the gastric antrum, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI 0.78–0.86) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.66–0.78), respectively. When targeting the gastric corpus, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI 0.90–0.94) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.88), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying white light endoscopy were 0.90 (95%CI 0.87–0.91) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying chromoendoscopy were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83–0.91) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.80–0.88), respectively. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus observed by magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, as indicated by a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.87–0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9872. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, either in magnifying white light endoscopy or magnifying chromoendoscopy mode. The “pit plus vascular pattern” classification in the gastric corpus is an optimum diagnostic criterion. Public Library of Science 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5167261/ /pubmed/27992489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201 Text en © 2016 Qi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qi, Qingqing
Guo, Chuanguo
Ji, Rui
Li, Zhen
Zuo, Xiuli
Li, Yanqing
Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Magnifying Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy for helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168201
work_keys_str_mv AT qiqingqing diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis
AT guochuanguo diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis
AT jirui diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis
AT lizhen diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis
AT zuoxiuli diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis
AT liyanqing diagnosticperformanceofmagnifyingendoscopyforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionametaanalysis