Cargando…
What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases?
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of surgery on local control and quality of life for patients with sacral metastases and to determine whether the complications of surgery were acceptable. METHODS: Curettage for metastatic lesions of the sacrum was performed in 154 patients with obvious sacral ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168313 |
_version_ | 1782483149255606272 |
---|---|
author | Du, Zhiye Guo, Wei Yang, Rongli Tang, Xiaodong Ji, Tao Li, Dasen |
author_facet | Du, Zhiye Guo, Wei Yang, Rongli Tang, Xiaodong Ji, Tao Li, Dasen |
author_sort | Du, Zhiye |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of surgery on local control and quality of life for patients with sacral metastases and to determine whether the complications of surgery were acceptable. METHODS: Curettage for metastatic lesions of the sacrum was performed in 154 patients with obvious sacral nerve compression symptoms between July 1997 and July 2014. Potential risk factors were evaluated in univariate analysis for associations with local control; multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to identify the combined effects. Complications were recorded. The pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale of pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores, and quality of life scores were collected to evaluate the impact of surgery. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rates were 71.8%, 41.1%, and 22.5% and the local control rates were 95.4%, 90.9%, and 79.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Tumors with rapid growth, the lack of preoperative radiotherapy, and application of aortic balloon occlusion were significantly associated with good local control. There were 29 (18.8%) complications related to surgery. The mean pain scores were 7.04 preoperatively, 1.66 at 1 month postoperatively (p = 0.003), and 1.51 at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.002). The mean ECOG scores were 2.82 preoperatively and 1.47 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in global health status (43.3 vs. 52.1), pain (62.0 vs. 33.2), and constipation (51.4 vs. 30.3) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for sacral metastasis is effective to palliate pain rapidly and improve constipation and quality of life and has a low rate of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51672702017-01-04 What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? Du, Zhiye Guo, Wei Yang, Rongli Tang, Xiaodong Ji, Tao Li, Dasen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of surgery on local control and quality of life for patients with sacral metastases and to determine whether the complications of surgery were acceptable. METHODS: Curettage for metastatic lesions of the sacrum was performed in 154 patients with obvious sacral nerve compression symptoms between July 1997 and July 2014. Potential risk factors were evaluated in univariate analysis for associations with local control; multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to identify the combined effects. Complications were recorded. The pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale of pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores, and quality of life scores were collected to evaluate the impact of surgery. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rates were 71.8%, 41.1%, and 22.5% and the local control rates were 95.4%, 90.9%, and 79.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Tumors with rapid growth, the lack of preoperative radiotherapy, and application of aortic balloon occlusion were significantly associated with good local control. There were 29 (18.8%) complications related to surgery. The mean pain scores were 7.04 preoperatively, 1.66 at 1 month postoperatively (p = 0.003), and 1.51 at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.002). The mean ECOG scores were 2.82 preoperatively and 1.47 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in global health status (43.3 vs. 52.1), pain (62.0 vs. 33.2), and constipation (51.4 vs. 30.3) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for sacral metastasis is effective to palliate pain rapidly and improve constipation and quality of life and has a low rate of complications. Public Library of Science 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5167270/ /pubmed/27992502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168313 Text en © 2016 Du et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Du, Zhiye Guo, Wei Yang, Rongli Tang, Xiaodong Ji, Tao Li, Dasen What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title | What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title_full | What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title_fullStr | What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title_short | What Is the Value of Surgical Intervention for Sacral Metastases? |
title_sort | what is the value of surgical intervention for sacral metastases? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duzhiye whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases AT guowei whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases AT yangrongli whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases AT tangxiaodong whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases AT jitao whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases AT lidasen whatisthevalueofsurgicalinterventionforsacralmetastases |