Cargando…

Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to explore the effects of adding statins to standard treatment on adult patients of pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: A systematic search up to December, 2015 of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lin, Qu, Moying, Chen, Yao, Zhou, Yaxiong, Wan, Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168101
_version_ 1782483149484195840
author Wang, Lin
Qu, Moying
Chen, Yao
Zhou, Yaxiong
Wan, Zhi
author_facet Wang, Lin
Qu, Moying
Chen, Yao
Zhou, Yaxiong
Wan, Zhi
author_sort Wang, Lin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to explore the effects of adding statins to standard treatment on adult patients of pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: A systematic search up to December, 2015 of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify randomized controlled trials with PH patients treated with statins. RESULTS: Five studies involving 425 patients were included into this meta-analysis. The results of our analysis showed that the statins can’t significantly increase 6-minute walking distance (6MWD, mean difference [MD] = -0.33 [CI: -18.25 to 17.59]), decrease the BORG dyspnea score (MD = -0.72 [CI: -2.28 to 0.85]), the clinical worsening risk (11% in statins vs. 10.1% in controls, Risk ratio = 1.06 [CI: 0.61, 1.83]), or the systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) (MD = -0.72 [CI: -2.28 to 0.85]). Subgroup analysis for PH due to COPD or non-COPD also showed no significance. CONCLUSIONS: Statins have no additional beneficial effect on standard therapy for PH, but the results from subgroup of PH due to COPD seem intriguing and further study with larger sample size and longer follow-up is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5167271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51672712017-01-04 Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Wang, Lin Qu, Moying Chen, Yao Zhou, Yaxiong Wan, Zhi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to explore the effects of adding statins to standard treatment on adult patients of pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: A systematic search up to December, 2015 of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify randomized controlled trials with PH patients treated with statins. RESULTS: Five studies involving 425 patients were included into this meta-analysis. The results of our analysis showed that the statins can’t significantly increase 6-minute walking distance (6MWD, mean difference [MD] = -0.33 [CI: -18.25 to 17.59]), decrease the BORG dyspnea score (MD = -0.72 [CI: -2.28 to 0.85]), the clinical worsening risk (11% in statins vs. 10.1% in controls, Risk ratio = 1.06 [CI: 0.61, 1.83]), or the systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) (MD = -0.72 [CI: -2.28 to 0.85]). Subgroup analysis for PH due to COPD or non-COPD also showed no significance. CONCLUSIONS: Statins have no additional beneficial effect on standard therapy for PH, but the results from subgroup of PH due to COPD seem intriguing and further study with larger sample size and longer follow-up is suggested. Public Library of Science 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5167271/ /pubmed/27992469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168101 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Lin
Qu, Moying
Chen, Yao
Zhou, Yaxiong
Wan, Zhi
Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Statins Have No Additional Benefit for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort statins have no additional benefit for pulmonary hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168101
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglin statinshavenoadditionalbenefitforpulmonaryhypertensionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT qumoying statinshavenoadditionalbenefitforpulmonaryhypertensionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenyao statinshavenoadditionalbenefitforpulmonaryhypertensionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhouyaxiong statinshavenoadditionalbenefitforpulmonaryhypertensionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wanzhi statinshavenoadditionalbenefitforpulmonaryhypertensionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials