Cargando…
The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103 |
_version_ | 1782483205120589824 |
---|---|
author | Klingner, Carsten M. Brodoehl, Stefan Huonker, Ralph Witte, Otto W. |
author_facet | Klingner, Carsten M. Brodoehl, Stefan Huonker, Ralph Witte, Otto W. |
author_sort | Klingner, Carsten M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5167733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51677332017-01-06 The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study Klingner, Carsten M. Brodoehl, Stefan Huonker, Ralph Witte, Otto W. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5167733/ /pubmed/28066197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103 Text en Copyright © 2016 Klingner, Brodoehl, Huonker and Witte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Klingner, Carsten M. Brodoehl, Stefan Huonker, Ralph Witte, Otto W. The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title | The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title_full | The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title_fullStr | The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title_short | The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study |
title_sort | processing of somatosensory information shifts from an early parallel into a serial processing mode: a combined fmri/meg study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klingnercarstenm theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT brodoehlstefan theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT huonkerralph theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT witteottow theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT klingnercarstenm processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT brodoehlstefan processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT huonkerralph processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy AT witteottow processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy |