Cargando…

The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study

The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klingner, Carsten M., Brodoehl, Stefan, Huonker, Ralph, Witte, Otto W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103
_version_ 1782483205120589824
author Klingner, Carsten M.
Brodoehl, Stefan
Huonker, Ralph
Witte, Otto W.
author_facet Klingner, Carsten M.
Brodoehl, Stefan
Huonker, Ralph
Witte, Otto W.
author_sort Klingner, Carsten M.
collection PubMed
description The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5167733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51677332017-01-06 The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study Klingner, Carsten M. Brodoehl, Stefan Huonker, Ralph Witte, Otto W. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5167733/ /pubmed/28066197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103 Text en Copyright © 2016 Klingner, Brodoehl, Huonker and Witte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Klingner, Carsten M.
Brodoehl, Stefan
Huonker, Ralph
Witte, Otto W.
The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title_full The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title_fullStr The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title_full_unstemmed The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title_short The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study
title_sort processing of somatosensory information shifts from an early parallel into a serial processing mode: a combined fmri/meg study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103
work_keys_str_mv AT klingnercarstenm theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT brodoehlstefan theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT huonkerralph theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT witteottow theprocessingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT klingnercarstenm processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT brodoehlstefan processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT huonkerralph processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy
AT witteottow processingofsomatosensoryinformationshiftsfromanearlyparallelintoaserialprocessingmodeacombinedfmrimegstudy