Cargando…
Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher det...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC516783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15333132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28 |
_version_ | 1782121773129531392 |
---|---|
author | Christov, Ivaylo I |
author_facet | Christov, Ivaylo I |
author_sort | Christov, Ivaylo I |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher detection accuracy in noisy ECGs METHODS: A real-time detection method is proposed, based on comparison between absolute values of summed differentiated electrocardiograms of one of more ECG leads and adaptive threshold. The threshold combines three parameters: an adaptive slew-rate value, a second value which rises when high-frequency noise occurs, and a third one intended to avoid missing of low amplitude beats. Two algorithms were developed: Algorithm 1 detects at the current beat and Algorithm 2 has an RR interval analysis component in addition. The algorithms are self-adjusting to the thresholds and weighting constants, regardless of resolution and sampling frequency used. They operate with any number L of ECG leads, self-synchronize to QRS or beat slopes and adapt to beat-to-beat intervals. RESULTS: The algorithms were tested by an independent expert, thus excluding possible author's influence, using all 48 full-length ECG records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The results were: sensitivity Se = 99.69 % and specificity Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 1 and Se = 99.74 % and Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 2. CONCLUSION: The statistical indices are higher than, or comparable to those, cited in the scientific literature. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-516783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5167832004-09-12 Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold Christov, Ivaylo I Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher detection accuracy in noisy ECGs METHODS: A real-time detection method is proposed, based on comparison between absolute values of summed differentiated electrocardiograms of one of more ECG leads and adaptive threshold. The threshold combines three parameters: an adaptive slew-rate value, a second value which rises when high-frequency noise occurs, and a third one intended to avoid missing of low amplitude beats. Two algorithms were developed: Algorithm 1 detects at the current beat and Algorithm 2 has an RR interval analysis component in addition. The algorithms are self-adjusting to the thresholds and weighting constants, regardless of resolution and sampling frequency used. They operate with any number L of ECG leads, self-synchronize to QRS or beat slopes and adapt to beat-to-beat intervals. RESULTS: The algorithms were tested by an independent expert, thus excluding possible author's influence, using all 48 full-length ECG records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The results were: sensitivity Se = 99.69 % and specificity Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 1 and Se = 99.74 % and Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 2. CONCLUSION: The statistical indices are higher than, or comparable to those, cited in the scientific literature. BioMed Central 2004-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC516783/ /pubmed/15333132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28 Text en Copyright © 2004 Christov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Christov, Ivaylo I Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title | Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title_full | Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title_fullStr | Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title_full_unstemmed | Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title_short | Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold |
title_sort | real time electrocardiogram qrs detection using combined adaptive threshold |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC516783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15333132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christovivayloi realtimeelectrocardiogramqrsdetectionusingcombinedadaptivethreshold |