Cargando…

Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold

BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Christov, Ivaylo I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC516783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15333132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28
_version_ 1782121773129531392
author Christov, Ivaylo I
author_facet Christov, Ivaylo I
author_sort Christov, Ivaylo I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher detection accuracy in noisy ECGs METHODS: A real-time detection method is proposed, based on comparison between absolute values of summed differentiated electrocardiograms of one of more ECG leads and adaptive threshold. The threshold combines three parameters: an adaptive slew-rate value, a second value which rises when high-frequency noise occurs, and a third one intended to avoid missing of low amplitude beats. Two algorithms were developed: Algorithm 1 detects at the current beat and Algorithm 2 has an RR interval analysis component in addition. The algorithms are self-adjusting to the thresholds and weighting constants, regardless of resolution and sampling frequency used. They operate with any number L of ECG leads, self-synchronize to QRS or beat slopes and adapt to beat-to-beat intervals. RESULTS: The algorithms were tested by an independent expert, thus excluding possible author's influence, using all 48 full-length ECG records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The results were: sensitivity Se = 99.69 % and specificity Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 1 and Se = 99.74 % and Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 2. CONCLUSION: The statistical indices are higher than, or comparable to those, cited in the scientific literature.
format Text
id pubmed-516783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5167832004-09-12 Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold Christov, Ivaylo I Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher detection accuracy in noisy ECGs METHODS: A real-time detection method is proposed, based on comparison between absolute values of summed differentiated electrocardiograms of one of more ECG leads and adaptive threshold. The threshold combines three parameters: an adaptive slew-rate value, a second value which rises when high-frequency noise occurs, and a third one intended to avoid missing of low amplitude beats. Two algorithms were developed: Algorithm 1 detects at the current beat and Algorithm 2 has an RR interval analysis component in addition. The algorithms are self-adjusting to the thresholds and weighting constants, regardless of resolution and sampling frequency used. They operate with any number L of ECG leads, self-synchronize to QRS or beat slopes and adapt to beat-to-beat intervals. RESULTS: The algorithms were tested by an independent expert, thus excluding possible author's influence, using all 48 full-length ECG records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The results were: sensitivity Se = 99.69 % and specificity Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 1 and Se = 99.74 % and Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 2. CONCLUSION: The statistical indices are higher than, or comparable to those, cited in the scientific literature. BioMed Central 2004-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC516783/ /pubmed/15333132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28 Text en Copyright © 2004 Christov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Christov, Ivaylo I
Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title_full Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title_fullStr Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title_full_unstemmed Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title_short Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold
title_sort real time electrocardiogram qrs detection using combined adaptive threshold
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC516783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15333132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-28
work_keys_str_mv AT christovivayloi realtimeelectrocardiogramqrsdetectionusingcombinedadaptivethreshold