Cargando…

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study

Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buonerba, Carlo, Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe, Pond, Gregory, Cartenì, Giacomo, Scagliarini, Sarah, Rozzi, Antonio, Quevedo, Fernando J., Dorff, Tanya, Nappi, Lucia, Lanzetta, Gaetano, Pagliaro, Lance, Eigl, Bernhard J., Naik, Gurudatta, Ferro, Matteo, Galdiero, Mariano, De Placido, Sabino, Sonpavde, Guru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487
_version_ 1782483347015991296
author Buonerba, Carlo
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
Pond, Gregory
Cartenì, Giacomo
Scagliarini, Sarah
Rozzi, Antonio
Quevedo, Fernando J.
Dorff, Tanya
Nappi, Lucia
Lanzetta, Gaetano
Pagliaro, Lance
Eigl, Bernhard J.
Naik, Gurudatta
Ferro, Matteo
Galdiero, Mariano
De Placido, Sabino
Sonpavde, Guru
author_facet Buonerba, Carlo
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
Pond, Gregory
Cartenì, Giacomo
Scagliarini, Sarah
Rozzi, Antonio
Quevedo, Fernando J.
Dorff, Tanya
Nappi, Lucia
Lanzetta, Gaetano
Pagliaro, Lance
Eigl, Bernhard J.
Naik, Gurudatta
Ferro, Matteo
Galdiero, Mariano
De Placido, Sabino
Sonpavde, Guru
author_sort Buonerba, Carlo
collection PubMed
description Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51684612017-01-06 Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study Buonerba, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Pond, Gregory Cartenì, Giacomo Scagliarini, Sarah Rozzi, Antonio Quevedo, Fernando J. Dorff, Tanya Nappi, Lucia Lanzetta, Gaetano Pagliaro, Lance Eigl, Bernhard J. Naik, Gurudatta Ferro, Matteo Galdiero, Mariano De Placido, Sabino Sonpavde, Guru Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5168461/ /pubmed/28066240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487 Text en Copyright © 2016 Buonerba, Di Lorenzo, Pond, Cartenì, Scagliarini, Rozzi, Quevedo, Dorff, Nappi, Lanzetta, Pagliaro, Eigl, Naik, Ferro, Galdiero, De Placido and Sonpavde. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Buonerba, Carlo
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
Pond, Gregory
Cartenì, Giacomo
Scagliarini, Sarah
Rozzi, Antonio
Quevedo, Fernando J.
Dorff, Tanya
Nappi, Lucia
Lanzetta, Gaetano
Pagliaro, Lance
Eigl, Bernhard J.
Naik, Gurudatta
Ferro, Matteo
Galdiero, Mariano
De Placido, Sabino
Sonpavde, Guru
Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title_full Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title_fullStr Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title_short Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
title_sort prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced penile cancer receiving salvage (2nd or later line) systemic treatment: a retrospective, multi-center study
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487
work_keys_str_mv AT buonerbacarlo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT dilorenzogiuseppe prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT pondgregory prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT cartenigiacomo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT scagliarinisarah prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT rozziantonio prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT quevedofernandoj prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT dorfftanya prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT nappilucia prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT lanzettagaetano prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT pagliarolance prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT eiglbernhardj prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT naikgurudatta prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT ferromatteo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT galdieromariano prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT deplacidosabino prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT sonpavdeguru prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy