Cargando…
Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study
Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487 |
_version_ | 1782483347015991296 |
---|---|
author | Buonerba, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Pond, Gregory Cartenì, Giacomo Scagliarini, Sarah Rozzi, Antonio Quevedo, Fernando J. Dorff, Tanya Nappi, Lucia Lanzetta, Gaetano Pagliaro, Lance Eigl, Bernhard J. Naik, Gurudatta Ferro, Matteo Galdiero, Mariano De Placido, Sabino Sonpavde, Guru |
author_facet | Buonerba, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Pond, Gregory Cartenì, Giacomo Scagliarini, Sarah Rozzi, Antonio Quevedo, Fernando J. Dorff, Tanya Nappi, Lucia Lanzetta, Gaetano Pagliaro, Lance Eigl, Bernhard J. Naik, Gurudatta Ferro, Matteo Galdiero, Mariano De Placido, Sabino Sonpavde, Guru |
author_sort | Buonerba, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5168461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51684612017-01-06 Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study Buonerba, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Pond, Gregory Cartenì, Giacomo Scagliarini, Sarah Rozzi, Antonio Quevedo, Fernando J. Dorff, Tanya Nappi, Lucia Lanzetta, Gaetano Pagliaro, Lance Eigl, Bernhard J. Naik, Gurudatta Ferro, Matteo Galdiero, Mariano De Placido, Sabino Sonpavde, Guru Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5168461/ /pubmed/28066240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487 Text en Copyright © 2016 Buonerba, Di Lorenzo, Pond, Cartenì, Scagliarini, Rozzi, Quevedo, Dorff, Nappi, Lanzetta, Pagliaro, Eigl, Naik, Ferro, Galdiero, De Placido and Sonpavde. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Buonerba, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Pond, Gregory Cartenì, Giacomo Scagliarini, Sarah Rozzi, Antonio Quevedo, Fernando J. Dorff, Tanya Nappi, Lucia Lanzetta, Gaetano Pagliaro, Lance Eigl, Bernhard J. Naik, Gurudatta Ferro, Matteo Galdiero, Mariano De Placido, Sabino Sonpavde, Guru Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title | Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title_full | Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title_short | Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study |
title_sort | prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced penile cancer receiving salvage (2nd or later line) systemic treatment: a retrospective, multi-center study |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buonerbacarlo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT dilorenzogiuseppe prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT pondgregory prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT cartenigiacomo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT scagliarinisarah prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT rozziantonio prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT quevedofernandoj prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT dorfftanya prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT nappilucia prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT lanzettagaetano prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT pagliarolance prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT eiglbernhardj prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT naikgurudatta prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT ferromatteo prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT galdieromariano prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT deplacidosabino prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT sonpavdeguru prognosticandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithadvancedpenilecancerreceivingsalvage2ndorlaterlinesystemictreatmentaretrospectivemulticenterstudy |