Cargando…
Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the views of general practitioners (GPs) about how they can provide care to homeless people (HP) and to explore which measures could influence their views. DESIGN: Mixed-methods design (qualitative –> quantitative (cross-sectional observational) → qualitative). Qualitative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27903566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013610 |
_version_ | 1782483357989339136 |
---|---|
author | Jego, Maeva Grassineau, Dominique Balique, Hubert Loundou, Anderson Sambuc, Roland Daguzan, Alexandre Gentile, Gaetan Gentile, Stéphanie |
author_facet | Jego, Maeva Grassineau, Dominique Balique, Hubert Loundou, Anderson Sambuc, Roland Daguzan, Alexandre Gentile, Gaetan Gentile, Stéphanie |
author_sort | Jego, Maeva |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To analyse the views of general practitioners (GPs) about how they can provide care to homeless people (HP) and to explore which measures could influence their views. DESIGN: Mixed-methods design (qualitative –> quantitative (cross-sectional observational) → qualitative). Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews and through questionnaires with closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistical analyses on SPPS; a content analysis was applied on qualitative data. SETTING: Primary care; views of urban GPs working in a deprived area in Marseille were explored by questionnaires and/or semistructured interview. PARTICIPANTS: 19 GPs involved in HP's healthcare were recruited for phase 1 (qualitative); for phase 2 (quantitative), 150 GPs who provide routine healthcare (‘standard’ GPs) were randomised, 144 met the inclusion criteria and 105 responded to the questionnaire; for phase 3 (qualitative), data were explored on 14 ‘standard’ GPs. RESULTS: In the quantitative phase, 79% of the 105 GPs already treated HP. Most of the difficulties they encountered while treating HP concerned social matters (mean level of perceived difficulties=3.95/5, IC 95 (3.74 to 4.17)), lack of medical information (mn=3.78/5, IC 95 (3.55 to 4.01)) patient's compliance (mn=3.67/5, IC 95 (3.45 to 3.89)), loneliness in practice (mn=3.45/5, IC 95 (3.18 to 3.72)) and time required for the doctor (mn=3.25, IC 95 (3 to 3.5)). From qualitative analysis we understood that maintaining a stable follow-up was a major condition for GPs to contribute effectively to the care of HP. Acting on health system organisation, developing a medical and psychosocial approach with closer relation with social workers and enhancing the collaboration between tailored and non-tailored programmes were also other key answers. CONCLUSIONS: If we adapt the conditions of GPs practice, they could contribute to the improvement of HP's health. These results will enable the construction of a new model of primary care organisation aiming to improve access to healthcare for HP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5168510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51685102016-12-22 Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study Jego, Maeva Grassineau, Dominique Balique, Hubert Loundou, Anderson Sambuc, Roland Daguzan, Alexandre Gentile, Gaetan Gentile, Stéphanie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To analyse the views of general practitioners (GPs) about how they can provide care to homeless people (HP) and to explore which measures could influence their views. DESIGN: Mixed-methods design (qualitative –> quantitative (cross-sectional observational) → qualitative). Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews and through questionnaires with closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistical analyses on SPPS; a content analysis was applied on qualitative data. SETTING: Primary care; views of urban GPs working in a deprived area in Marseille were explored by questionnaires and/or semistructured interview. PARTICIPANTS: 19 GPs involved in HP's healthcare were recruited for phase 1 (qualitative); for phase 2 (quantitative), 150 GPs who provide routine healthcare (‘standard’ GPs) were randomised, 144 met the inclusion criteria and 105 responded to the questionnaire; for phase 3 (qualitative), data were explored on 14 ‘standard’ GPs. RESULTS: In the quantitative phase, 79% of the 105 GPs already treated HP. Most of the difficulties they encountered while treating HP concerned social matters (mean level of perceived difficulties=3.95/5, IC 95 (3.74 to 4.17)), lack of medical information (mn=3.78/5, IC 95 (3.55 to 4.01)) patient's compliance (mn=3.67/5, IC 95 (3.45 to 3.89)), loneliness in practice (mn=3.45/5, IC 95 (3.18 to 3.72)) and time required for the doctor (mn=3.25, IC 95 (3 to 3.5)). From qualitative analysis we understood that maintaining a stable follow-up was a major condition for GPs to contribute effectively to the care of HP. Acting on health system organisation, developing a medical and psychosocial approach with closer relation with social workers and enhancing the collaboration between tailored and non-tailored programmes were also other key answers. CONCLUSIONS: If we adapt the conditions of GPs practice, they could contribute to the improvement of HP's health. These results will enable the construction of a new model of primary care organisation aiming to improve access to healthcare for HP. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5168510/ /pubmed/27903566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013610 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Jego, Maeva Grassineau, Dominique Balique, Hubert Loundou, Anderson Sambuc, Roland Daguzan, Alexandre Gentile, Gaetan Gentile, Stéphanie Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title | Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title_full | Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title_fullStr | Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title_short | Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study |
title_sort | improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? results from a mixed study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27903566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jegomaeva improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT grassineaudominique improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT baliquehubert improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT loundouanderson improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT sambucroland improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT daguzanalexandre improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT gentilegaetan improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy AT gentilestephanie improvingaccessandcontinuityofcareforhomelesspeoplehowcouldgeneralpractitionerseffectivelycontributeresultsfromamixedstudy |