Cargando…

Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders

INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered an important cause of voice disorder. We aimed to determine the frequency of LPR in patients with voice disorder and the association between Koufman Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maldhure, Swati, Chandrasekharan, Ramanathan, Dutta, Amit- Kumar, Chacko, Ashok, Kurien, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008387
_version_ 1782483369202810880
author Maldhure, Swati
Chandrasekharan, Ramanathan
Dutta, Amit- Kumar
Chacko, Ashok
Kurien, Mary
author_facet Maldhure, Swati
Chandrasekharan, Ramanathan
Dutta, Amit- Kumar
Chacko, Ashok
Kurien, Mary
author_sort Maldhure, Swati
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered an important cause of voice disorder. We aimed to determine the frequency of LPR in patients with voice disorder and the association between Koufman Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and proximal acid reflux in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study in patients aged more than 18 years presenting at the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic with a change in voice lasting more than 3 weeks. All patients underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and a dual-probe esophageal pH study. LPR was diagnosed by a Koufman RSI of >13 and/or RFS of >7. GERD was diagnosed according to a DeMeester Johnson score of >14.7. Proximal acid reflux was diagnosed if acid exposure time was >0.02% in a proximal pH probe. RESULTS: The study included 30 patients with a voice disorder. The mean age of participants was 38.5 years and 40% of patients were female. Using either of the two criteria, LPR was present in 46.7% of patients, half of whom had GERD. Among the remaining 53.3% patients with a voice disorder and no evidence of LPR, GERD was present in 25%. There was no significant association between the presence of LPR based on RSI (P=1) and GERD or RFS and GERD (P=0.06). Proximal acid reflux was present in only 10% patients with a voice disorder, and there was no significant association of this test with RFS (P=1) or RSI (P=1). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients with a voice disorder have LPR, and only a subset of these patients have evidence of GERD. Fiberoptic laryngoscopic findings (RFS) complementing RSI appears to be important in diagnosing possible reflux etiology in voice disorders and can be an indicator for instituting anti-reflux therapy. However, there is no significant association between RSI, RFS, and GERD suggesting that these tests evaluate different features of the disease. Proximal acid reflux is uncommon in patients with voice disorder based on current measurement criteria. Acid exposure time as measured in the proximal probe of a 24-hour dual pH probe may need to be re-evaluated as one of the diagnostic criteria for LPR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51685682016-12-22 Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders Maldhure, Swati Chandrasekharan, Ramanathan Dutta, Amit- Kumar Chacko, Ashok Kurien, Mary Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered an important cause of voice disorder. We aimed to determine the frequency of LPR in patients with voice disorder and the association between Koufman Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and proximal acid reflux in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study in patients aged more than 18 years presenting at the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic with a change in voice lasting more than 3 weeks. All patients underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and a dual-probe esophageal pH study. LPR was diagnosed by a Koufman RSI of >13 and/or RFS of >7. GERD was diagnosed according to a DeMeester Johnson score of >14.7. Proximal acid reflux was diagnosed if acid exposure time was >0.02% in a proximal pH probe. RESULTS: The study included 30 patients with a voice disorder. The mean age of participants was 38.5 years and 40% of patients were female. Using either of the two criteria, LPR was present in 46.7% of patients, half of whom had GERD. Among the remaining 53.3% patients with a voice disorder and no evidence of LPR, GERD was present in 25%. There was no significant association between the presence of LPR based on RSI (P=1) and GERD or RFS and GERD (P=0.06). Proximal acid reflux was present in only 10% patients with a voice disorder, and there was no significant association of this test with RFS (P=1) or RSI (P=1). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients with a voice disorder have LPR, and only a subset of these patients have evidence of GERD. Fiberoptic laryngoscopic findings (RFS) complementing RSI appears to be important in diagnosing possible reflux etiology in voice disorders and can be an indicator for instituting anti-reflux therapy. However, there is no significant association between RSI, RFS, and GERD suggesting that these tests evaluate different features of the disease. Proximal acid reflux is uncommon in patients with voice disorder based on current measurement criteria. Acid exposure time as measured in the proximal probe of a 24-hour dual pH probe may need to be re-evaluated as one of the diagnostic criteria for LPR. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5168568/ /pubmed/28008387 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maldhure, Swati
Chandrasekharan, Ramanathan
Dutta, Amit- Kumar
Chacko, Ashok
Kurien, Mary
Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title_full Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title_fullStr Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title_short Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders
title_sort role of ph monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients with voice disorders
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008387
work_keys_str_mv AT maldhureswati roleofphmonitoringinlaryngopharyngealrefluxpatientswithvoicedisorders
AT chandrasekharanramanathan roleofphmonitoringinlaryngopharyngealrefluxpatientswithvoicedisorders
AT duttaamitkumar roleofphmonitoringinlaryngopharyngealrefluxpatientswithvoicedisorders
AT chackoashok roleofphmonitoringinlaryngopharyngealrefluxpatientswithvoicedisorders
AT kurienmary roleofphmonitoringinlaryngopharyngealrefluxpatientswithvoicedisorders