Cargando…
Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 differe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241 |
_version_ | 1782483374462468096 |
---|---|
author | Ball, Lauren Barnes, Katelyn Laur, Celia Crowley, Jennifer Ray, Sumantra |
author_facet | Ball, Lauren Barnes, Katelyn Laur, Celia Crowley, Jennifer Ray, Sumantra |
author_sort | Ball, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. INTERVENTIONS: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36–108). RESULTS: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5168600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51686002016-12-22 Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach Ball, Lauren Barnes, Katelyn Laur, Celia Crowley, Jennifer Ray, Sumantra BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. INTERVENTIONS: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36–108). RESULTS: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5168600/ /pubmed/27974369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Ball, Lauren Barnes, Katelyn Laur, Celia Crowley, Jennifer Ray, Sumantra Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title | Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title_full | Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title_fullStr | Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title_short | Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
title_sort | setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balllauren settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach AT barneskatelyn settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach AT laurcelia settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach AT crowleyjennifer settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach AT raysumantra settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach |