Cargando…

Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach

OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Lauren, Barnes, Katelyn, Laur, Celia, Crowley, Jennifer, Ray, Sumantra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241
_version_ 1782483374462468096
author Ball, Lauren
Barnes, Katelyn
Laur, Celia
Crowley, Jennifer
Ray, Sumantra
author_facet Ball, Lauren
Barnes, Katelyn
Laur, Celia
Crowley, Jennifer
Ray, Sumantra
author_sort Ball, Lauren
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. INTERVENTIONS: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36–108). RESULTS: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51686002016-12-22 Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach Ball, Lauren Barnes, Katelyn Laur, Celia Crowley, Jennifer Ray, Sumantra BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. DESIGN: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. PARTICIPANTS: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. INTERVENTIONS: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36–108). RESULTS: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5168600/ /pubmed/27974369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Ball, Lauren
Barnes, Katelyn
Laur, Celia
Crowley, Jennifer
Ray, Sumantra
Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title_full Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title_fullStr Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title_full_unstemmed Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title_short Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
title_sort setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241
work_keys_str_mv AT balllauren settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach
AT barneskatelyn settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach
AT laurcelia settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach
AT crowleyjennifer settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach
AT raysumantra settingprioritiesforresearchinmedicalnutritioneducationaninternationalapproach