Cargando…
Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742 |
_version_ | 1782483377724588032 |
---|---|
author | Kuczawski, Maxine Stevenson, Matt Goodacre, Steve Teare, M Dawn Ramlakhan, Shammi Morris, Francis Mason, Suzanne |
author_facet | Kuczawski, Maxine Stevenson, Matt Goodacre, Steve Teare, M Dawn Ramlakhan, Shammi Morris, Francis Mason, Suzanne |
author_sort | Kuczawski, Maxine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT use for anticoagulated patients with a head injury. DESIGN: Decision-analysis modelling of data from a multicentre observational study. SETTING: 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 3566 adults (aged ≥16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury, were taking warfarin and underwent selective CT scanning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated expected benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the entire cohort to receive a CT scan; estimated increased costs of CT and also the potential cost implications associated with patient survival and improved health. These values were used to estimate the cost per QALY of implementing a strategy of CT for all patients compared with observed practice based on guidelines recommending selective CT use. RESULTS: Of the 1420 of 3534 patients (40%) who did not receive a CT scan, 7 (0.5%) suffered a potentially avoidable head injury-related adverse outcome. If CT scanning had been performed in all patients, appropriate treatment could have gained 3.41 additional QALYs but would have incurred £193 149 additional treatment costs and £130 683 additional CT costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £94 895/QALY gained for unselective compared with selective CT use is markedly above the threshold of £20–30 000/QALY used by the UK National Institute for Care Excellence to determine cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: CT scanning for all anticoagulated patients with head injury is not cost-effective compared with selective use of CT scanning based on guidelines recommending scanning only for those with evidence of traumatic brain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 02461498. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5168615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51686152016-12-22 Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort Kuczawski, Maxine Stevenson, Matt Goodacre, Steve Teare, M Dawn Ramlakhan, Shammi Morris, Francis Mason, Suzanne BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT use for anticoagulated patients with a head injury. DESIGN: Decision-analysis modelling of data from a multicentre observational study. SETTING: 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 3566 adults (aged ≥16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury, were taking warfarin and underwent selective CT scanning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated expected benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the entire cohort to receive a CT scan; estimated increased costs of CT and also the potential cost implications associated with patient survival and improved health. These values were used to estimate the cost per QALY of implementing a strategy of CT for all patients compared with observed practice based on guidelines recommending selective CT use. RESULTS: Of the 1420 of 3534 patients (40%) who did not receive a CT scan, 7 (0.5%) suffered a potentially avoidable head injury-related adverse outcome. If CT scanning had been performed in all patients, appropriate treatment could have gained 3.41 additional QALYs but would have incurred £193 149 additional treatment costs and £130 683 additional CT costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £94 895/QALY gained for unselective compared with selective CT use is markedly above the threshold of £20–30 000/QALY used by the UK National Institute for Care Excellence to determine cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: CT scanning for all anticoagulated patients with head injury is not cost-effective compared with selective use of CT scanning based on guidelines recommending scanning only for those with evidence of traumatic brain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 02461498. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5168615/ /pubmed/27974370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Kuczawski, Maxine Stevenson, Matt Goodacre, Steve Teare, M Dawn Ramlakhan, Shammi Morris, Francis Mason, Suzanne Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title | Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title_full | Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title_fullStr | Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title_short | Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
title_sort | should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a ct scan? decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuczawskimaxine shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT stevensonmatt shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT goodacresteve shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT tearemdawn shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT ramlakhanshammi shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT morrisfrancis shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort AT masonsuzanne shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort |