Cargando…

Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort

OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuczawski, Maxine, Stevenson, Matt, Goodacre, Steve, Teare, M Dawn, Ramlakhan, Shammi, Morris, Francis, Mason, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742
_version_ 1782483377724588032
author Kuczawski, Maxine
Stevenson, Matt
Goodacre, Steve
Teare, M Dawn
Ramlakhan, Shammi
Morris, Francis
Mason, Suzanne
author_facet Kuczawski, Maxine
Stevenson, Matt
Goodacre, Steve
Teare, M Dawn
Ramlakhan, Shammi
Morris, Francis
Mason, Suzanne
author_sort Kuczawski, Maxine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT use for anticoagulated patients with a head injury. DESIGN: Decision-analysis modelling of data from a multicentre observational study. SETTING: 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 3566 adults (aged ≥16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury, were taking warfarin and underwent selective CT scanning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated expected benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the entire cohort to receive a CT scan; estimated increased costs of CT and also the potential cost implications associated with patient survival and improved health. These values were used to estimate the cost per QALY of implementing a strategy of CT for all patients compared with observed practice based on guidelines recommending selective CT use. RESULTS: Of the 1420 of 3534 patients (40%) who did not receive a CT scan, 7 (0.5%) suffered a potentially avoidable head injury-related adverse outcome. If CT scanning had been performed in all patients, appropriate treatment could have gained 3.41 additional QALYs but would have incurred £193 149 additional treatment costs and £130 683 additional CT costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £94 895/QALY gained for unselective compared with selective CT use is markedly above the threshold of £20–30 000/QALY used by the UK National Institute for Care Excellence to determine cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: CT scanning for all anticoagulated patients with head injury is not cost-effective compared with selective use of CT scanning based on guidelines recommending scanning only for those with evidence of traumatic brain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 02461498.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51686152016-12-22 Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort Kuczawski, Maxine Stevenson, Matt Goodacre, Steve Teare, M Dawn Ramlakhan, Shammi Morris, Francis Mason, Suzanne BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT use for anticoagulated patients with a head injury. DESIGN: Decision-analysis modelling of data from a multicentre observational study. SETTING: 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 3566 adults (aged ≥16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury, were taking warfarin and underwent selective CT scanning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated expected benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the entire cohort to receive a CT scan; estimated increased costs of CT and also the potential cost implications associated with patient survival and improved health. These values were used to estimate the cost per QALY of implementing a strategy of CT for all patients compared with observed practice based on guidelines recommending selective CT use. RESULTS: Of the 1420 of 3534 patients (40%) who did not receive a CT scan, 7 (0.5%) suffered a potentially avoidable head injury-related adverse outcome. If CT scanning had been performed in all patients, appropriate treatment could have gained 3.41 additional QALYs but would have incurred £193 149 additional treatment costs and £130 683 additional CT costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £94 895/QALY gained for unselective compared with selective CT use is markedly above the threshold of £20–30 000/QALY used by the UK National Institute for Care Excellence to determine cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: CT scanning for all anticoagulated patients with head injury is not cost-effective compared with selective use of CT scanning based on guidelines recommending scanning only for those with evidence of traumatic brain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 02461498. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5168615/ /pubmed/27974370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Kuczawski, Maxine
Stevenson, Matt
Goodacre, Steve
Teare, M Dawn
Ramlakhan, Shammi
Morris, Francis
Mason, Suzanne
Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title_full Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title_fullStr Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title_full_unstemmed Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title_short Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
title_sort should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a ct scan? decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742
work_keys_str_mv AT kuczawskimaxine shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT stevensonmatt shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT goodacresteve shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT tearemdawn shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT ramlakhanshammi shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT morrisfrancis shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort
AT masonsuzanne shouldallanticoagulatedpatientswithheadinjuryreceiveactscandecisionanalysismodellingofanobservationalcohort