Cargando…

Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a critical appraisal (CA) tool that addressed study design and reporting quality as well as the risk of bias in cross-sectional studies (CSSs). In addition, the aim was to produce a help document to guide the non-expert user through the tool. DESIGN:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Downes, Martin J, Brennan, Marnie L, Williams, Hywel C, Dean, Rachel S
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Evidence Based Practice
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458

Ejemplares similares

Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal
por: Bush, Shirley H, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
por: Wang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing the appropriateness of prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in Australia: a cross-sectional study
por: Hibbert, Peter D, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A two-arm parallel-group individually randomised prison pilot study of a male remand alcohol intervention for self-efficacy enhancement: the APPRAISE study protocol
por: Holloway, Aisha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Publication status of completed registered studies in paediatric appendicitis: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Breil, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Frailty measurement and outcomes in interventional studies: protocol for a systematic review of randomised control trials
por: Shears, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey
por: Lafuente-Lafuente, Carmelo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Byrne, David, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Health facility structure and maternal characteristics related to essential newborn care in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
por: Menezes, Maria Alexsandra Silva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
por: Cho, Yongil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Coproduction in commissioning decisions: is there an association with decision satisfaction for commissioners working in the NHS? A cross-sectional survey 2010/2011
por: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Douet, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Healthcare professionals’ behavior, skills, knowledge and attitudes on evidence-based health practice: a protocol of cross-sectional study
por: Mariano, Arielly Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Adaptation of the DEMQOL-Proxy for routine use in care homes: a cross-sectional study of the reliability and validity of DEMQOL-CH
por: Hughes, Laura J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A new stratified risk assessment tool for whiplash injuries developed from a prospective observational study
por: Kasch, Helge, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on the prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension: a cross-sectional analysis of 10 799 individuals
por: Alyabsi, Mesnad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Off-label indications of aspirin in gynaecology and obstetrics outpatients at two Chinese tertiary care hospitals: a retrospective cross-sectional study
por: Shen, Sijie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Practicing evidence-based Orthodontics: How to critically appraise a randomized controlled trial
por: Cunha-Cruz, Joana
Publicado: (2015)

Transitional care quality indicators to assess quality of care following hospitalisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure: a systematic review protocol
por: Michael, Faith, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
por: Elia, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evidence-based practice utilisation and its associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals in West Shoa zone, central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
por: Megersa, Yohanis, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Assessment of the quality and content of national and international guidelines on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using the AGREE II instrument
por: Bazzano, Alessandra N, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Answering medical questions at the point of care: a cross-sectional study comparing rapid decisions based on PubMed and Epistemonikos searches with evidence-based recommendations developed with the GRADE approach
por: Izcovich, Ariel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Utilisation of health management information and its determinant factors among health professionals working at public health facilities in North Wollo Zone, Northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
por: Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Inter-rater and test–retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle–Ottawa Scales
por: Oremus, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review
por: Müller, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS
por: Elwyn, Glyn, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Validity of studies suggesting preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer: A critical appraisal of randomized trials
por: Manzini, Giulia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The psychological impact of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis on patients’ lives: a Critically Appraised Topic
por: O'Reilly, P., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An audit of the quality of inpatient care for adults with learning disability in the UK
por: Sheehan, Rory, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review
por: Fujita, Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Examining the quality of evidence to support the effectiveness of interventions: an analysis of systematic reviews
por: Kane, Robert L, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Long-term effect of computer-assisted decision support for antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a prospective ‘before/after’ cohort study
por: Nachtigall, I, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Clinical practice guidelines for hypertension in China: a systematic review of the methodological quality
por: Chen, Yin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Horizon scanning, rapid reviews and living evidence to support decision-making: lessons from the work of the Critical Intelligence Unit in New South Wales, Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Williamson, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines addressing acupuncture interventions: a systematic survey of 133 guidelines and 433 acupuncture recommendations
por: Tang, Xiaorong, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma based on AGREE II and AGREE-REX: a systematic review protocol
por: He, Ling-Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_vbq49orig6cbe7g1juemqmmlb0