Cargando…
Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF)
OBJECTIVES: Approaches to measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) in populations often privilege physical violence, with poor assessment of other experiences. This has led to underestimating the scope and impact of IPV. The aim of this study was to develop a brief, reliable and valid self-report m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012824 |
_version_ | 1782483383471833088 |
---|---|
author | Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Wathen, C Nadine Varcoe, Colleen MacMillan, Harriet L Scott-Storey, Kelly Mantler, Tara Hegarty, Kelsey Perrin, Nancy |
author_facet | Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Wathen, C Nadine Varcoe, Colleen MacMillan, Harriet L Scott-Storey, Kelly Mantler, Tara Hegarty, Kelsey Perrin, Nancy |
author_sort | Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Approaches to measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) in populations often privilege physical violence, with poor assessment of other experiences. This has led to underestimating the scope and impact of IPV. The aim of this study was to develop a brief, reliable and valid self-report measure of IPV that adequately captures its complexity. DESIGN: Mixed-methods instrument development and psychometric testing to evolve a brief version of the Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) using secondary data analysis and expert feedback. SETTING: Data from 5 Canadian IPV studies; feedback from international IPV experts. PARTICIPANTS: 31 international IPV experts including academic researchers, service providers and policy actors rated CAS items via an online survey. Pooled data from 6278 adult Canadian women were used for scale development. PRIMARY/SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Scale reliability and validity; robustness of subscales assessing different IPV experiences. RESULTS: A 15-item version of the CAS has been developed (Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form, CAS(R)-SF), including 12 items developed from the original CAS and 3 items suggested through expert consultation and the evolving literature. Items cover 3 abuse domains: physical, sexual and psychological, with questions asked to assess lifetime, recent and current exposure, and abuse frequency. Factor loadings for the final 3-factor solution ranged from 0.81 to 0.91 for the 6 psychological abuse items, 0.63 to 0.92 for the 4 physical abuse items, and 0.85 and 0.93 for the 2 sexual abuse items. Moderate correlations were observed between the CAS(R)-SF and measures of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and coercive control. Internal consistency of the CAS(R)-SF was 0.942. These reliability and validity estimates were comparable to those obtained for the original 30-item CAS. CONCLUSIONS: The CAS(R)-SF is brief self-report measure of IPV experiences among women that has demonstrated initial reliability and validity and is suitable for use in population studies or other studies. Additional validation of the 15-item scale with diverse samples is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5168640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51686402016-12-22 Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Wathen, C Nadine Varcoe, Colleen MacMillan, Harriet L Scott-Storey, Kelly Mantler, Tara Hegarty, Kelsey Perrin, Nancy BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Approaches to measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) in populations often privilege physical violence, with poor assessment of other experiences. This has led to underestimating the scope and impact of IPV. The aim of this study was to develop a brief, reliable and valid self-report measure of IPV that adequately captures its complexity. DESIGN: Mixed-methods instrument development and psychometric testing to evolve a brief version of the Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) using secondary data analysis and expert feedback. SETTING: Data from 5 Canadian IPV studies; feedback from international IPV experts. PARTICIPANTS: 31 international IPV experts including academic researchers, service providers and policy actors rated CAS items via an online survey. Pooled data from 6278 adult Canadian women were used for scale development. PRIMARY/SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Scale reliability and validity; robustness of subscales assessing different IPV experiences. RESULTS: A 15-item version of the CAS has been developed (Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form, CAS(R)-SF), including 12 items developed from the original CAS and 3 items suggested through expert consultation and the evolving literature. Items cover 3 abuse domains: physical, sexual and psychological, with questions asked to assess lifetime, recent and current exposure, and abuse frequency. Factor loadings for the final 3-factor solution ranged from 0.81 to 0.91 for the 6 psychological abuse items, 0.63 to 0.92 for the 4 physical abuse items, and 0.85 and 0.93 for the 2 sexual abuse items. Moderate correlations were observed between the CAS(R)-SF and measures of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and coercive control. Internal consistency of the CAS(R)-SF was 0.942. These reliability and validity estimates were comparable to those obtained for the original 30-item CAS. CONCLUSIONS: The CAS(R)-SF is brief self-report measure of IPV experiences among women that has demonstrated initial reliability and validity and is suitable for use in population studies or other studies. Additional validation of the 15-item scale with diverse samples is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5168640/ /pubmed/27927659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012824 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Wathen, C Nadine Varcoe, Colleen MacMillan, Harriet L Scott-Storey, Kelly Mantler, Tara Hegarty, Kelsey Perrin, Nancy Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title | Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title_full | Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title_fullStr | Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title_short | Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)—Short Form (CAS(R)-SF) |
title_sort | development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: the composite abuse scale (revised)—short form (cas(r)-sf) |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fordgilboemarilyn developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT wathencnadine developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT varcoecolleen developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT macmillanharrietl developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT scottstoreykelly developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT mantlertara developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT hegartykelsey developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf AT perrinnancy developmentofabriefmeasureofintimatepartnerviolenceexperiencesthecompositeabusescalerevisedshortformcasrsf |