Cargando…

Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study

OBJECTIVES: To identify the authentication and detection rate of serialised medicines using medicines authentication technology. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: 4192 serialised medicines were entered into a hospital dispensary over two separate 8-week stages in 2015. Medicines were authenticated using secu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naughton, Bernard, Roberts, Lindsey, Dopson, Sue, Chapman, Stephen, Brindley, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013837
_version_ 1782483386675232768
author Naughton, Bernard
Roberts, Lindsey
Dopson, Sue
Chapman, Stephen
Brindley, David
author_facet Naughton, Bernard
Roberts, Lindsey
Dopson, Sue
Chapman, Stephen
Brindley, David
author_sort Naughton, Bernard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the authentication and detection rate of serialised medicines using medicines authentication technology. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: 4192 serialised medicines were entered into a hospital dispensary over two separate 8-week stages in 2015. Medicines were authenticated using secure external database cross-checking, triggered by the scanning of a two-dimensional data matrix with a unit specific 12-digit serial code. 4% of medicines included were preprogrammed with a message to identify the product as either expired, pack recalled, product recalled or counterfeit. SETTING: A site within a large UK National Health Service teaching hospital trust. PARTICIPANTS: Accredited checking staff, pharmacists and dispensers in a pharmacy department. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Authentication and detection rate of counterfeit expired and recalled medicines. RESULTS: The operational detection rate of counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines scanned as a combined group was 81.4% (stage 1 (S1)) and 87% (stage 2 (S2)). The technology's technical detection rate (TDR) was 100%; however, not all medicines were scanned and of those that were scanned not all that generated a warning message were quarantined. Owing to an operational authentication rate (OAR) of 66.3% (over both stages), only 31.8% of counterfeit medicines, 58% of recalled drugs and 64% of expired medicines were detected as a proportion of those entered into the study. Response times (RTs) of 152 ms (S1) and 165 ms (S2) were recorded, meeting the falsified medicines directive-mandated 300 ms limit. CONCLUSIONS: TDRs and RTs were not a limiting factor in this study. The suboptimal OAR poses significant quality and safety issues with this detection approach. Authentication at the checking stage, however, demonstrated higher OARs. There is a need for further qualitative research to establish the reasons for less than absolute authentication and detection rates in the hospital environment to improve this technology in preparation for the incumbent European Union regulative deadline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51686552016-12-22 Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study Naughton, Bernard Roberts, Lindsey Dopson, Sue Chapman, Stephen Brindley, David BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: To identify the authentication and detection rate of serialised medicines using medicines authentication technology. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: 4192 serialised medicines were entered into a hospital dispensary over two separate 8-week stages in 2015. Medicines were authenticated using secure external database cross-checking, triggered by the scanning of a two-dimensional data matrix with a unit specific 12-digit serial code. 4% of medicines included were preprogrammed with a message to identify the product as either expired, pack recalled, product recalled or counterfeit. SETTING: A site within a large UK National Health Service teaching hospital trust. PARTICIPANTS: Accredited checking staff, pharmacists and dispensers in a pharmacy department. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Authentication and detection rate of counterfeit expired and recalled medicines. RESULTS: The operational detection rate of counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines scanned as a combined group was 81.4% (stage 1 (S1)) and 87% (stage 2 (S2)). The technology's technical detection rate (TDR) was 100%; however, not all medicines were scanned and of those that were scanned not all that generated a warning message were quarantined. Owing to an operational authentication rate (OAR) of 66.3% (over both stages), only 31.8% of counterfeit medicines, 58% of recalled drugs and 64% of expired medicines were detected as a proportion of those entered into the study. Response times (RTs) of 152 ms (S1) and 165 ms (S2) were recorded, meeting the falsified medicines directive-mandated 300 ms limit. CONCLUSIONS: TDRs and RTs were not a limiting factor in this study. The suboptimal OAR poses significant quality and safety issues with this detection approach. Authentication at the checking stage, however, demonstrated higher OARs. There is a need for further qualitative research to establish the reasons for less than absolute authentication and detection rates in the hospital environment to improve this technology in preparation for the incumbent European Union regulative deadline. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5168655/ /pubmed/27940634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013837 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Naughton, Bernard
Roberts, Lindsey
Dopson, Sue
Chapman, Stephen
Brindley, David
Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title_full Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title_short Effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
title_sort effectiveness of medicines authentication technology to detect counterfeit, recalled and expired medicines: a two-stage quantitative secondary care study
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013837
work_keys_str_mv AT naughtonbernard effectivenessofmedicinesauthenticationtechnologytodetectcounterfeitrecalledandexpiredmedicinesatwostagequantitativesecondarycarestudy
AT robertslindsey effectivenessofmedicinesauthenticationtechnologytodetectcounterfeitrecalledandexpiredmedicinesatwostagequantitativesecondarycarestudy
AT dopsonsue effectivenessofmedicinesauthenticationtechnologytodetectcounterfeitrecalledandexpiredmedicinesatwostagequantitativesecondarycarestudy
AT chapmanstephen effectivenessofmedicinesauthenticationtechnologytodetectcounterfeitrecalledandexpiredmedicinesatwostagequantitativesecondarycarestudy
AT brindleydavid effectivenessofmedicinesauthenticationtechnologytodetectcounterfeitrecalledandexpiredmedicinesatwostagequantitativesecondarycarestudy