Cargando…

Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition

INTRODUCTION: Worry and rumination are two forms of repetitive thinking characterised by their negative content and apparently uncontrollable nature. Although worry and rumination share common features and have been conceptualised as part of a transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking (RNT) proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krahé, Charlotte, Mathews, Andrew, Whyte, Jessica, Hirsch, Colette R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27986741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404
_version_ 1782483390631510016
author Krahé, Charlotte
Mathews, Andrew
Whyte, Jessica
Hirsch, Colette R
author_facet Krahé, Charlotte
Mathews, Andrew
Whyte, Jessica
Hirsch, Colette R
author_sort Krahé, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Worry and rumination are two forms of repetitive thinking characterised by their negative content and apparently uncontrollable nature. Although worry and rumination share common features and have been conceptualised as part of a transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking (RNT) process, it remains unclear whether they share the same underlying cognitive mechanisms. This multisession experimental study investigates the tendency to make negative interpretations regarding ambiguous information as a cognitive mechanism underlying RNT. We compare multisession cognitive bias modification for interpretations (CBM-I) with an active control condition to examine whether repeatedly training positive interpretations reduces worry and rumination in individuals with generalised anxiety disorder or depression, respectively. Further, we examine the potential modulatory effects of engaging in RNT immediately prior to CBM-I. DESIGN, METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A community sample of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for either generalised anxiety disorder (n=60) or current major depressive episode (n=60) will be randomly allocated to CBM-I with prior RNT, CBM-I without prior RNT (ie, standard CBM-I), or an active control (no resolution of ambiguity) condition. All conditions receive a 3-week internet-based intervention consisting of one initial session at the first study visit and nine home-based sessions of CBM-I training (or active control). We will assess and compare the effects of CBM-I with and without prior RNT on ‘near-transfer’ measures of interpretation bias closely related to the training as well as ‘far-transfer’ outcomes related to RNT and emotional distress. Impact on questionnaire measures will additionally be assessed at 1-month follow-up. Multigroup analyses will be conducted to assess the impact of CBM-I on near-transfer and far-transfer outcome measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51686722016-12-22 Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition Krahé, Charlotte Mathews, Andrew Whyte, Jessica Hirsch, Colette R BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Worry and rumination are two forms of repetitive thinking characterised by their negative content and apparently uncontrollable nature. Although worry and rumination share common features and have been conceptualised as part of a transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking (RNT) process, it remains unclear whether they share the same underlying cognitive mechanisms. This multisession experimental study investigates the tendency to make negative interpretations regarding ambiguous information as a cognitive mechanism underlying RNT. We compare multisession cognitive bias modification for interpretations (CBM-I) with an active control condition to examine whether repeatedly training positive interpretations reduces worry and rumination in individuals with generalised anxiety disorder or depression, respectively. Further, we examine the potential modulatory effects of engaging in RNT immediately prior to CBM-I. DESIGN, METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A community sample of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for either generalised anxiety disorder (n=60) or current major depressive episode (n=60) will be randomly allocated to CBM-I with prior RNT, CBM-I without prior RNT (ie, standard CBM-I), or an active control (no resolution of ambiguity) condition. All conditions receive a 3-week internet-based intervention consisting of one initial session at the first study visit and nine home-based sessions of CBM-I training (or active control). We will assess and compare the effects of CBM-I with and without prior RNT on ‘near-transfer’ measures of interpretation bias closely related to the training as well as ‘far-transfer’ outcomes related to RNT and emotional distress. Impact on questionnaire measures will additionally be assessed at 1-month follow-up. Multigroup analyses will be conducted to assess the impact of CBM-I on near-transfer and far-transfer outcome measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5168672/ /pubmed/27986741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Krahé, Charlotte
Mathews, Andrew
Whyte, Jessica
Hirsch, Colette R
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title_full Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title_fullStr Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title_short Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
title_sort cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27986741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404
work_keys_str_mv AT krahecharlotte cognitivebiasmodificationforinterpretationwithandwithoutpriorrepetitivenegativethinkingtoreduceworryandruminationingeneralisedanxietydisorderanddepressionprotocolforamultisessionexperimentalstudywithanactivecontrolcondition
AT mathewsandrew cognitivebiasmodificationforinterpretationwithandwithoutpriorrepetitivenegativethinkingtoreduceworryandruminationingeneralisedanxietydisorderanddepressionprotocolforamultisessionexperimentalstudywithanactivecontrolcondition
AT whytejessica cognitivebiasmodificationforinterpretationwithandwithoutpriorrepetitivenegativethinkingtoreduceworryandruminationingeneralisedanxietydisorderanddepressionprotocolforamultisessionexperimentalstudywithanactivecontrolcondition
AT hirschcoletter cognitivebiasmodificationforinterpretationwithandwithoutpriorrepetitivenegativethinkingtoreduceworryandruminationingeneralisedanxietydisorderanddepressionprotocolforamultisessionexperimentalstudywithanactivecontrolcondition